2009 Media Coverage of WWII: ‘ENGLAND MUST STOP WAGING WAR ON THE NAZIS.’ ‘AMERICA MUST NOT OVER-REACT TO PEARL HARBOR.’
Dateline: January 3rd 1944
Fury continues to mount worldwide about the senseless loss of civilian life in Germany caused by England’s callous bombing of German cities including Berlin, Hamburg and Dresden. As of today many innocent German women and children have died in these utterly brutal bombing missions. And now there are ground offensives starting on mainland Europe.
The English have claimed that they are merely retaliating against the V-1 flying bombs being launched indiscriminately by Nazis at their civilian population in London, Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Coventry and other cities. The English point out that their enemy is sworn to its utter destruction and has used the missiles and flying bombs against its civilians without any regard to English loss of life. Moreover it makes the case that their own bombing missions are specifically directed to military targets that the German army has intentionally planted in the heart of civilian populations to try and deter English counter-attacks.
Of course England has a right to exist. Of course England has a right to defend itself. But it should ensure that its responses are PROPORTIONATE. Since many more Germans are dying than English – the English should either tone down the success and accuracy of their bombing – or allow the Germans to catch up on the death count.
To be honest – if more English women and children were dying – we wouldn’t feel quite so bad about the number of Germans dying. But it’s just so UNFAIR that more Germans are dying…
Perhaps some English people could arrange to kill themselves to match the number of Germans dying as a result of the English retaliation bombing? It would be so considerate – and it might help England’s critics feel less miserable about the number of Nazis dying. Something that is causing them so much concern.
It would also put paid to that wretched proportionality argument.
Alternatively, perhaps the English could arrange to be less effective in their bombing? Or only bomb military targets that are nowhere near civilians – even though the vast majority of the V-1 rockets are intentionally being launched from the heart of civilian population centers.
Now the English will argue that the Germans have INTENTIONALLY positioned all their launch pads for the V-1 rockets in the middle of civilian populations to inhibit the English from bombing those launch sites. Well – tough noogies to the Brits! Sorry – but if the Germans are smarter or more skillful at cynically using their civilians as human shields than you – tough luck!
You can’t have it both ways. If you truly wish to save your nation from being annihilated by Nazi missiles you’d better stop looking to win a popularity contest. The Nazis are waging this war to win and to utterly destroy England. If all you Brits care about is popularity – then you may as well resign yourself to speaking German…
It’s about time that little nations who wish to defend themselves wised up to their responsibilities.
Otherwise the same stupid complaints will be made at some point in the 21st Century when some little nation finds itself under constant attack from rockets fired at its civilian population by a terrorizing enemy that has sworn to destroy it….
QASSAM: story of the city of Sderot and the people who live there. The city has been attacked by more than 8,000 Palestinian Qassam rockets since 2005.
What if Mexico were launching rockets into San Diego or San Antonio? How would you want the US to respond?
HAT TIP: chutzpaproductions