The United States government’s stepped-up courting of Islamist groups is on display at the State Department web portal www.america.gov.
The site bills itself as a place to “meet the people” and “explore the values and ideas that define the character of the United States.” But when it comes to American Muslim organizations, that often means providing a U.S. government stamp of approval to organizations linked to the Muslim Brotherhood such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America(ISNA) or apologists like the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).
A September 4 podcast about President Obama’s Community Service Initiative illustrates how the federal government gives free and favorable publicity to Brotherhood-linked Islamists. America.gov noted the contribution of Dalia Mogahed (a protégé of terror-apologist John Esposito) to the president’s initiative. Mogahed and Esposito work together at the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies.
The podcast added that Mogahed, executive director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies and a member of the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, had launchedwww.MuslimServe.org, “a Web site that identifies a national goal of 1,000 service projects for Muslim Americans.” It quoted at length from a speech Mogahed delivered to ISNA’s national convention setting out principles for the president’s initiative.
During the Cold War, government bureaus like the United States Information Agency worked to counter disinformation by driving home the point that freedom and democracy are superior to communism and tyranny. But Zuhdi Jasser, head of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, says that in today’s struggle with radical Islam, the United States government is doing something very different – evenperverse.
It is aiding and abetting the efforts of groups like CAIR and ISNA to anoint themselves representatives of all American Muslims – even though many Muslims want nothing to do with the Islamists.
At a July 20 meeting on Capitol Hill with Farah Pandith, head of the State Department’s new office of representative to Muslim communities, Jasser criticized the 64-page booklet “Being Muslim in America” as an example of what is wrong. The publication is “like Pravda. It’s all about how Muslims in America are motherhood and apple pie,” Jasser said he told Pandith. “It’s like the Muslim community has no warts” or divisions.
Nothing could be further from the truth, says Jasser. In presenting this monolithic, idyllic picture of Muslims, the State Department is ignoring inconvenient facts like the intra-Muslim debate over imposition of Sharia and Muslims’ larger relationship with non-Muslims, Jasser told IPT News.
At the meeting, organized by Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus founder Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC), Pandith reacted defensively when Jasser (accompanied by representatives of non-Islamist Muslim groups like the World Organization for Resource Development & Education and the Islamic Supreme Council of America) criticized the State Department for letting Islamists monopolize the debate.
In interviews, Jasser and Khalim Massoud, head of Muslims Against Sharia (who did not attend the meeting organized by Myrick) emphasized that the State Department continues to assist anti-freedom elements in the Muslim community. As examples of what is wrong, they pointed to a number of items that that appeared on thewww.America.gov site in recent weeks:
Under its International Visitor Leadership Program, the State Department continues to partner with Islamist groups linked to the Brotherhood such as the Muslim American Society. Read more about that here.
U.S. Muslim outreach since September 11 has been plagued by a bias in favor of “Saudi-funded or -supported groups with the biggest publicity machines,” said Nina Shea, a member of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom and senior fellow with the Hudson Institute. “All too often, the ones getting covered are the ones with grievances against the United States. Those who are pro-freedom like Zuhdi Jasser are excluded.”
The U.S. government’s discrimination in favor of “Sunni beneficiaries of Gulf funding” in Muslim outreach efforts establishes them “as spokesmen for the Arab Muslim community,” Shea replied when asked about the government’s tilt in favor of CAIR, ISNA and other Islamist groups. “This has the effect of squeezing out other voices and not giving recognition to Muslim-Americans with initiative that are trying to start organizations rooted in American values.”
Shea said this discrimination was particularly evident at the recent White House Iftar dinner. Virtually all of the Muslims in attendance were Sunnis like ISNA’s Mattson and ambassadors from nations like Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco and Pakistan, while Shi’ites, political dissidents and Sunni foes of Wahhabism were absent. “It would be extremely uncomfortable for these dictatorships and monarchies to be in the same room with dissidents,” Shea told IPT News.
The U.S. government’s actions “raise constitutional questions,” added Shea, a veteran attorney who has been appointed to serve as a delegate to the main United Nations human-rights body by Democratic and Republican administrations. “For the United States to freeze out the Shia or the Sufis or pro-American Muslims, people who are pro-freedom, pro-human rights, is almost an infringement on the no-establishment clause of the First Amendment.”
According to Shea, “showering benefits” on Islamists is a “dangerous game” that undercuts major U.S. interests like encouraging respect for human rights and democratization in the Muslim world.
“Without the support from the government, radical Muslim groups would have remained a fringe,” adds Massoud of Muslims against Sharia. “That’s how extremists who suggest that Israel is responsible for 9/11 [MPAC’s Marayati) become friends of the Progressive Jewish Alliance and radicals who would like to replace the Constitution with the Koran get to represent American Muslims on TV.”
According to Jasser, the America.gov site spotlights the wrong kind of “diversity.” “Just showing a bunch of Muslims living in different environments, doing different things, doesn’t help us,” Jasser said. The State Department highlights the work of organizations like CAIR and ISNA,” who focus on victimization issues – profiling, women not being able to wear the hijab, you’re playing into that.
Favoring the Muslim Brotherhood-related groups “weakens U.S. interests in terms of diversity,” says Walid Phares, a scholar with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies who helped organize the July 20 meeting in Myrick’s office. The more radical organizations “have been working on this for over 20 years” thanks to grants “provided by the U.S. government and the Saudis,” Phares adds.
“It is like the U.S. government is shooting itself in the foot.” INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT
RELATED STORIES: Islam in America