Ron Paul to Sean Hannity: "Stop with your Shari'a"

Little serpent head, Ron Paul, pooh poohs the idea that there’s a threat to this country from Shari’a proponents. He also thinks that building an Islamic Victory Mosque at Ground Zero is a terrific idea. 

Politico - Ron Paul on Monday night dismissed Sean Hannity’s fear that Sharia law is coming to the United States.

In a somewhat contentious interview with the Fox News host, Paul asserted that Hannity’s perspective on American relations with the Muslim world is far from reality. Discussing the run-up to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Paul told a perturbed Hannity that “the 9/11 Commission recognized there was a blow back phenomenon from the fact we were over there and had a base in Saudi Arabia.”

Hannity then shot back with the concern that Islamic leaders are seeing to
created a new, worldwide caliphate. “If they were at war with us for a decade, do you not agree there is a desire among Islamic extremists to have an Islamic caliphate, Sharia law?” an incensed Hannity asked.

“I think because we are over there, their numbers grow,” Paul responded. “You have radicals in all religions, if there is some way to incite them, their numbers will grow.”

The two revisited their fight over Sharia when Hannity needled Paul for defending the Imam who wanted to set up a near Ground Zero in New York. “You are not concerned about the families of 9/11 and what happened?” Hannity asked.

“This means you blame the religion, you don’t want to blame the religion,” Paul responded. (Yes, we do)


Leave a reply on “Ron Paul to Sean Hannity: "Stop with your Shari'a"”

  1. Otter says:

    You silly fools. He is not a muslim fan. He is a stay the F out of the middle east fan.
    How can you deny that since we started noodling around in the middle east in 1954 that we have become a target due to our own actions. Screw israel, screw egypt, screw, iran, iraq, etc…

    You poke a dog long enough it will bite you even if you have been feeding it.

  2. kilo davis says:

    Property rights is the foundation for liberty.

  3. james wells says:

    anyone who thinks terror acts by muslims against America began in the 20th century don’t know history! They have attacked us since we became a nation, that’s why there is a personal copy of the koran which belonged to Thomas Jefferson in the national archives….he and the other founding fathers didn’t understand their aggression until he & others read their ‘holy’ book….check out the Marine anthem, notice the phrase…”from the shores of tripoli….”

  4. chuck says:

    paul has disclosed how he will deal with the islamnazation and sharia problem but no ones picking up on it. hes not in that position of authority and he knows it will be the will of the people that will decide and deal on that issue.he is so strict on the constitution he knows what can be done with it via the peoples voice and unlike most previous administrations he would execute the will of the people before he would let the federal gov. call the shots.he seems to be the only one willing to stand up to all the bad guys.these past subversions and end arounds on the constitution is what got us here and hes more than aware of that.decade after decade the people have lost their voice to big government.he knows how to clean it up,by letting us do it,government be damned.you really think any of the other hopefuls are going to do a damn thing about it?think about that a minute,seriously.

    • chuck, why don’t you tell us what he will do about Islamization. From what I’ve heard he will do nothing. He says it’s the fault of our foreign policy that the muslim world hates us so much. I know he won’t do anything to Iran.

  5. Keith Mahone (aka Charles Martel) says:

    Poor Ron Paul. He is just alienating everyone with his above-room-temperature I.Q.

  6. CJ says:

    Otter, PLEASE do yourself a favor and pick up a US History book, and you MIGHT sound intelligent some day. In particular, PLEASE tell us all exactly which muslim country we had a base in and/or which muslim country we were “meddling” in from at least 1784 – 1805? You also might want to learn what the words of the US Marine Hymn of “From the hall of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli . . .” mean. PLEASE, I’m dying to know why you think they were attacking us then?

    For those who actually have a brain and can comprehend history, I post the following article entitled, “What Thomas Jefferson Learned From the Muslim Book of Jihad”

    What Thomas Jefferson learned
    from the Muslim book of jihad
    By Ted Sampley
    U.S. Veteran Dispatch
    January 2007

    Democrat Keith Ellison is now officially the first Muslim United States congressman. True to his pledge, he placed his hand on the Quran, the Muslim book of jihad and pledged his allegiance to the United States during his ceremonial swearing-in.

    Capitol Hill staff said Ellison’s swearing-in photo opportunity drew more media than they had ever seen in the history of the U.S. House. Ellison represents the 5th Congressional District of Minnesota.

    The Quran Ellison used was no ordinary book. It once belonged to Thomas Jefferson, third president of the United States and one of America’s founding fathers. Ellison borrowed it from the Rare Book Section of the Library of Congress. It was one of the 6,500 Jefferson books archived in the library.

    Ellison, who was born in Detroit and converted to Islam while in college, said he chose to use Jefferson’s Quran because it showed that “a visionary like Jefferson” believed that wisdom could be gleaned from many sources.

    There is no doubt Ellison was right about Jefferson believing wisdom could be “gleaned” from the Muslim Quran. At the time Jefferson owned the book, he needed to know everything possible about Muslims because he was about to advocate war against the Islamic “Barbary” states of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Tripoli.

    Ellison’s use of Jefferson’s Quran as a prop illuminates a subject once well-known in the history of the United States, but, which today, is mostly forgotten – the Muslim pirate slavers who over many centuries enslaved millions of Africans and tens of thousands of Christian Europeans and Americans in the Islamic “Barbary” states.

    Over the course of 10 centuries, Muslim pirates cruised the African and Mediterranean coastline, pillaging villages and seizing slaves.

    The taking of slaves in pre-dawn raids on unsuspecting coastal villages had a high casualty rate. It was typical of Muslim raiders to kill off as many of the “non-Muslim” older men and women as possible so the preferred “booty” of only young women and children could be collected.

    Young non-Muslim women were targeted because of their value as concubines in Islamic markets. Islamic law provides for the sexual interests of Muslim men by allowing them to take as many as four wives at one time and to have as many concubines as their fortunes allow.

    Boys, as young as 9 or 10 years old, were often mutilated to create eunuchs who would bring higher prices in the slave markets of the Middle East. Muslim slave traders created “eunuch stations” along major African slave routes so the necessary surgery could be performed. It was estimated that only a small number of the boys subjected to the mutilation survived after the surgery.

    When American colonists rebelled against British rule in 1776, American merchant ships lost Royal Navy protection. With no American Navy for protection, American ships were attacked and their Christian crews enslaved by Muslim pirates operating under the control of the “Dey of Algiers”–an Islamist warlord ruling Algeria.

    Because American commerce in the Mediterranean was being destroyed by the pirates, the Continental Congress agreed in 1784 to negotiate treaties with the four Barbary States. Congress appointed a special commission consisting of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin, to oversee the negotiations.

    Lacking the ability to protect its merchant ships in the Mediterranean, the new America government tried to appease the Muslim slavers by agreeing to pay tribute and ransoms in order to retrieve seized American ships and buy the freedom of enslaved sailors.

    Adams argued in favor of paying tribute as the cheapest way to get American commerce in the Mediterranean moving again. Jefferson was opposed. He believed there would be no end to the demands for tribute and wanted matters settled “through the medium of war.” He proposed a league of trading nations to force an end to Muslim piracy.

    In 1786, Jefferson, then the American ambassador to France, and Adams, then the American ambassador to Britain, met in London with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the “Dey of Algiers” ambassador to Britain.

    The Americans wanted to negotiate a peace treaty based on Congress’ vote to appease.

    During the meeting Jefferson and Adams asked the Dey’s ambassador why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

    In a later meeting with the American Congress, the two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam “was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

    For the following 15 years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800.

    Not long after Jefferson’s inauguration as president in 1801, he dispatched a group of frigates to defend American interests in the Mediterranean, and informed Congress.

    Declaring that America was going to spend “millions for defense but not one cent for tribute,” Jefferson pressed the issue by deploying American Marines and many of America’s best warships to the Muslim Barbary Coast.

    The USS Constitution, USS Constellation, USS Philadelphia, USS Chesapeake, USS Argus, USS Syren and USS Intrepid all saw action.

    In 1805, American Marines marched across the desert from Egypt into Tripolitania, forcing the surrender of Tripoli and the freeing of all American slaves.

    During the Jefferson administration, the Muslim Barbary States, crumbling as a result of intense American naval bombardment and on shore raids by Marines, finally officially agreed to abandon slavery and piracy.

    Jefferson’s victory over the Muslims lives on today in the Marine Hymn, with the line, “From the halls of Montezuma, to the shores of Tripoli, We fight our country’s battles in the air, on land and sea.”

    It wasn’t until 1815 that the problem was fully settled by the total defeat of all the Muslim slave trading pirates.

    Jefferson had been right. The “medium of war” was the only way to put and end to the Muslim problem. Mr. Ellison was right about Jefferson. He was a “visionary” wise enough to read and learn about the enemy from their own Muslim book of jihad.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>