BNI has posted many stories that show the United States and Nato forces fought on the wrong side of that war. Here is an essay, never before published, about the tragedy of that decision with its unforgivable betrayal of a long-time ally, the Serbs, in favor of the Muslim invaders who were doing what they do all over the world, replacing the indigenous population with an Islamic republic, all the while crying that they were the victims of ethnic cleansing.
THE ORIGINS OF ETHNIC CLEANSING IN THE BALKANS: THE UNTOLD STORY
by Zhivko B. Damyanovich
Due to the length of this essay, summarizing the main points may be helpful:
1. The Kosovar Albanians came from Albania to the Kosovo-Metohia region as intruders when most of the original Slavic (Serb and Montenegrin) population – who had lived there for up to ten centuries – migrated under the threat of utter extermination due to their (at the time) unsupported fight for freedom from Turkish oppression.
2. The new Albanian settlers – for the most part Muslims, who were therefore trusted by the ruling Ottoman authorities – actively assisted the Turks in the stifling of the remaining Slavs.
3. During the time of direst hardship for the Serbian Army in its 1915 retreat (from the Bulgarian, Austro-Hungarian, and German armies), Albanians living on the route of withdrawal across the Albanian mountains had no compassion for the exhausted Serbian soldiers (a whole third of whom perished during the march) but seized every opportunity to mug, rob and kill any stragglers.
4. The Kosovar Albanians actively joined with Bulgarian and Austro-Hungarian occupation forces in severe persecution and harassment of ethnic Slavs during World War I;
5. Yet, these Albanians were not molested by the Yugoslav authorities in the slightest following World War I.
6. During the Italian occupation of Kosovo-Metohia of 1941-43 and the extension of that occupation by German and Bulgarian forces in 1943-45, the Kosovar Albanians systematically engaged in a sustained and well-organized campaign of ethnic cleansing unknown to the West, displacing a considerable number of Serb and Montenegrin families.
7. Immediately after the liberation of Serbia in 1944, the communist government of Josip Broz Tito enacted a secret order forbidding all those Serbs and Montenegrins who had been expelled or who had fled during the war-years to return to their homes in Kosovo-Metohia! This was a monstrous act against the Serbian people perpetrated by their own government (under a virulently – though covertly – anti-Serb president) in order to conform to an alien, unethical and forcibly imposed ideology never accepted by the Serbs.
8. The Kosovar Albanians on the other hand readily accepted the communists as their liberators and claimed all the legally proclaimed prerogatives of a distinct and compact minority in their own right.
9. Not only were the leaders and those other Kosovar Albanians who were guilty of innumerable atrocities committed during the war-years pardoned and left unpunished; they were treated as the unfortunate victims of Fascism, and thus compensated by being granted full autonomy to handle their own affairs regardless of the weakened remnants of the Orthodox-Christian Serbs and Montenegrins. All of this was enforced within and under the auspices of “The People’s Republic of Serbia”!!!
10. The Kosovars used this unexpected generosity as a further springboard for promoting their nationalist aspirations. First covertly and timidly, then progressively becoming much more blatant and violent, they attacked Slav property and people using all sorts of misdeeds including arson, rape and murder (especially of children, the weak, and the old).
1211. These same Kosovar Albanian authorities secretly permitted – even encouraged – illegal immigration of Albanians fleeing the brutal regime of Enver Hoxha as well as the pitifully wretched living conditions there. In this way, the ethnic imbalance already existing continued to get progressively worse.
12. The population policies of the postwar Yugoslav government were very benign to the Islamic custom of polygamy, resulting in a proliferation of children but also of penurious families living in ever- worsening conditions which all the outpouring of Serbian aid could not counteract. This is a factor readily and deliberately overlooked in stressing the overall compactness of the ethnic Albanian population of the region nowadays.
13. Throughout the time of Tito’s government and beyond (1945-1988), a steady exodus of Serb refugees fled Kosovo-Metohia, intimidated and terrified into doing so by those same Kosovar-Albanian authorities while the muzzled Serbian authorities in Belgrade turned a blind eye. Scared for their lives, they reluctantly left their homes and everything else so dear to them, gnashing their teeth while forced into suppressing their resentment and need for justice, hoping to return in better days.
About the Author
Mr. Zhivko Bogdan Damyanovich was born in Rušanj (now a suburb of Belgrade) in 1916. [At that time, his father and three of his paternal uncles were serving on the Salonika front (with the Allies).] After getting a Bachelor of Science (majoring in agriculture) in 1939 and joining the General Union of Farm Coöperatives in 1941, he served as a pilot with the Yugoslav Air Force during the war (1941 and 1944-45). Upon being demobilized at the end of World War II (1945), he was sent to the Ministry of Agriculture of the Federal People’s Republic of Yugoslavia (FPRY), being in charge of farm wages and product prices. On account of his vigorous opposition to compulsory requisitions of farm products at inappropriately low prices, arbitrary taxation of farm holdings, and enforced collectivization of agriculture, he was expelled from the state-run trade unions and dismissed from the Ministry (1952). Due to the failure of the Peasant Workers’ Coöperatives to improve agricultural production as well as to the consequently drastic changes in farm policies undertaken, he was reinstated and sent to the Economics Institute of FPRY (1953); when the Institute was abolished (1958) as too “liberal”, he was moved to the Federal Planning Commission.
In 1960, Mr. Damyanovich was able to use an invitation to specialize in land economics to move to Canada, where he graduated from the University of Toronto with a Master of Science (1962). He then had several jobs with the Ontario Agricultural College, the Manitoba Department of Agriculture and Conservation, and the Federal Trade and Commerce Department of Canada before moving in 1965 to Rome (Italy) to work for the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. He retired in 1978 and currently lives in Canada.
Throughout his career, Mr. Damyanovich wrote close to one-hundred expert-level reports, most of which were published (in Yugoslavia and for intra-governmental use only). His Master’s thesis “Labour Productivity in World Agriculture” won the Agricultural Economics Society of Canada’s award as the best submission in Land Economics at Canadian Universities in 1962; however, he was never allowed to defend his major work, the study “Resources in World Agriculture and their Use, 1947-78″ which was submitted as his PhD dissertation at the University of Belgrade, due to political interference.
PAGE 1
The ongoing drama in the Balkans has made me deeply frustrated as a human being. It is not a mere question of my heart being split between my allegiance to Canada (as my adopted country) versus my feelings for my relatives, friends, and ancient homeland afflicted with so many disasters. It is far more than that.
I abhor atrocities of any and all kinds. I must note how from my earliest childhood I heard time and again how terribly my people suffered under Turkish tyranny for centuries, and then under the Austro-Hungarian and Bulgarian invaders in World War I. Furthermore, I myself underwent the experience of World War II in which Yugoslavia was dismembered, with her inhabitants exposed to terrible losses, oppression, and terror. However, unknown to the Western World, a reign of terror continued for many years after the war’s end via the purges conducted in many districts in Serbia of monarchists known as etniks, in which many families perished.
As a boy I was very proud of how, after the end of the First World War, the Serbian people were greatly praised by others: not only for their bravery, but also for their generosity and kindness even to their fallen enemies. This praise was given both on an individual and collective level (especially considering the terms imposed on their foes). Doctor Archibald Reiss, a Swiss war correspondent of the time, expressed his great admiration for the Serbs by asking in his will that his heart be buried on the battlefield of Kajmakalan (altitude of 2,520 metres) where in September 1918 he had witnessed the Serbian army break through the Salonika front (near Thessalonika, Greece) with Allied help. He made this gesture as a token of deepest homage to the gallantry and valour of the Serb soldiers he had been with throughout their four years of war, sharing in their sufferings as well as in their ultimate victory.
I therefore find it exceedingly hard to believe the stories now being circulated and repeated endlessly in the Western media of the worst cruelty and evil being perpetrated by Serbs in Kosovo upon their Albanian brethren. Is it possible that a nation, proud of its mediæval glory, culture, and centuries-long struggle for freedom from various oppressors, can fall so low as to disgrace her entire past, disavow her ancestral fame and honour, turn her soldiers into the lowest barbarians, and expose her whole people to universal condemnation leading to the catastrophic ruin currently being inflicted?
Very likely there is some truth in these stories, but surely not to such an extreme extent.
In all great conflicts throughout history, whether they are intertribal skirmishes, civil clashes, or international wars, the truth is the first casualty. I used the word ‘casualty’ in terms of the truth being distorted, ignored, and filtered to suit various interests. There is no nation that can claim not to have had dark periods in its history, with atrocities, senseless massacres and enforced famines. Africa is a prime example with wars in Nigeria (Biafra), the Congo, Somalia, Angola, Mozambique, and more recently in Rwanda and Burundi. Even now the cycle continues with the Sudanese, Kurds, Chiapas natives, Tibetans, Chechens, Armenians, east Timorese and others. It has been the same throughout history; except there often were no war reporters to document, or historians to research and preserve the facts about those horrors for posterity.
It is extremely hard for me to accept the discriminatory generalization of various measures and actions undertaken by the present authorities in Kosovo as presented by the American media and repeatedly rebroadcast throughout the rest of the member nations of NATO. I’m particularly appalled by the ease with which journalists, Members of Parliament, and even governing statesmen (and women) use provocative and incendiary language. Do the events in Kosovo amount to “genocide,” or is the use of such terms rhetorical excess? Are we really dealing with a new “Holocaust,” or mere clichés that readily fit in with such defamatory and hate-inciting idioms? I don’t think more needs to be said about the utter inappropriateness of using such terms without substantiation nor the dreadful harm that can be caused by intentionally misusing such words.
Let us consider the accusations being levelled against the Serbian nation of “ethnic cleansing.” For a long time, I’ve been waiting for the Yugoslav authorities, or someone else, to explain the severe ethnical imbalance in the population of Kosovo and Metohia present at the outset of these past months’ unfortunate events. Surely, one ought to wonder how has it come to be that the Serbian presence in its own homeland has dwindled to where they are now an almost-negligible minority (10% of the total inhabitants)?! If this “cradle of Serbian civilization”, their “Jerusalem” was (and is) so dear to Serb hearts, how have they come to the point of losing almost all claim to it?!? In answer thereto, let me attempt a brief historical essay.
READ THE REST BELOW:
ORIGINS OF ETHNIC CLEANSING IN THE BALKINS: THE UNTOLD STORY
Libra says
Slobodan Milosevic Ratko Mladic is hero in my eyes
Raul the Destroyer, oppressor of the weak and simple minded says
I understand the impulse to write in such a wordy way as does this author, peppering one’s prose with all manner of excessive verbiage. The writer is trying to express his feelings as well as to tell his story. However it makes for a very tiresome read. If I could give any author one piece of advice it would be to edit for concision and eliminate every single unnecessary word.
BareNakedIslam says
Raul, Feelings are important when telling a side of the story that our media and Democrat politicians never let us hear.
ADHD says
To Raul:
Did you read the summary on this posting (it’s only 1 page long)?
ADHD says
Simultaneously, opar5 (perhaps after having read the essay here being discussed) touches upon a point of importance: non-Muslim peoples were INDEED subject to paying Jizya via losing their children.
In particular I used to think about healthy males (including sound of limb) being taken from about ages 4 to 10 and put into Islâmic schools and taught a curriculum carefully designed to purge all memories of home, parents, siblings and community – and to inculcate a fanatical loyalty to Islâm and the Turkish Sultan. Enough times, MANY families, with great reluctance and disgust, were forced to mutilate their sons in some way so as to ruin their likelihood of being conscripted by the Turkish-Muslims. [A common strategy was to put a boiling-hot egg next to the child’s groin, presumably so he wouldn’t be able to walk.]
Thanks however, opar5, for reminding me that yes, females would indeed then be enslaved and frequently made to do harem duties for the Sultan or other high-functionaries… [Note the Turkish word “harem”: it’s derived from the Arabic “harim” or “haram”, meaning “forbidden”. No wonder: the harem women were jealously guarded from any and all unauthorised males in apartments guarded by eunuchs (often black children from Sudan and further south taken in the slave trade and castrated – by the Copts of Egypt (according to Robert K. Massie), presumably as part of THEIR Jizya).]
ADHD says
BeliOraoSrbija, you’re right that the majority population of Crna-Gora (Latinised to “Montenegro”) indeed is ethnically Serb.
A question I’ve wondered about their leadership: why were they so eager to part ways with Serbia and in that way put the last stab into the former Yugoslavia?? Personal greed, big egos, opportunism??
Meanwhile, beautiful points from “theremustbejustice”!!!! Truly, if ANY crime is particularly common in wartime, it apparently seems to be rape: the front-line soldiers, facing death at any time of the day or night and brutalised by both military discipline AND negative experiences inflicted when they are on duty in the line of fire, are all the more desperate for some solace (and no doubt also to vent their aggression upon enemy peoples in the hope of defiling their blood-lines!!). To boot, it also seems that when men have been generally successful – and especially after a major success like a promotion, new job honours or some sort of victory (especially military, though a competition of some sort can do the trick) – then they feel extra-arrogant and feel they deserve to be rewarded sexually. That, sad to say, is – I believe – part of why rape can be so exceedingly-frequent in war.
Most certainly I’m NOT condoning or excusing it IN THE SLIGHTEST!!!! However, from what yours truly can tell – and if I’m wrong, please tell me!! – that’s something that happens as a result thereof. To boot, it’s not one side alone that’s usually guilty (in spite of Time magazine blackballing the Serbs with headlines like Serbia’s SPITE, which I distincty remember from the time of the Bosnian War!!!!): all sides, as like as not, are liable to have their escutcheons blotted (stained) that way!!! We can be certain that the Croats and Boshnjaci (Boshñaks) are NO LESS guilty; especially when one really has a good-sized amount of hate present in the conflict, as the Yugoslav peoples have…
[Even the British, Americans and other allies are recorded as having some rapes of Frenchwomen, Dutch, Belgians and other supposedly-friendly people upon their hands – obviously these would have been against orders, but human nature is all too liable to go against orders if somebody is physically strong yet mentally and spiritually weak. THEN, if it’s army policy to condone such things – as for quite some time happened on the Soviet side against the Nazi-Germans!!! – then a REAL rampage can happen!! In fact, things got so rowdy and evil that the Russian bigwigs had to tell its troops to moderate their activities in that way and even to discipline them for such atrocities!]
Either way, in response to both BeliOraoSrbija and redhawk1989, I’ve tried to at least acknowledge the validity of their points: in spite of being half-Serb, it IS my wish to be as impartial as possible…
theremustbejustice says
http://news.yahoo.com/bosnian-serb-war-victim-wants-jolies-film-banned-121444025.html
theremustbejustice says
BNI you did not know this…
http://wp.me/p1WYlB-4a
barenakedislam says
theremust, no I did not. Thanks
BeliOraoSrbija says
People who live in Crna Gora are SERBS not anything else.
theremustbejustice says
“Bosnia moving toward Sharia law”
http://www.b92.net/eng/news/region-article.php?yyyy=2011&mm=12&dd=20&nav_id=77894
Lorenzo Bouchard says
All self respecting individuals must dedicate themselves to total WAR against Islam. For starters sign the “Ban Islam” petition at: http://www.petitiononline.com/MYSTIC/petition.html
ADHD says
Postscript to the above: while we’re at it, the singular proper spelling of “Bošnjaci” ought to be “Bošnjak” – I’ve sometimes compromised in order to help with the actual pronunciation. Mea culpa…
Either way, regardless of the bitter enmities between Catholics and Orthodox (which ought NOT to exist between real Christians!!!), it’s my hope that my comments will help clarify the reasons and facets of the miserable conflicts in what as Yugoslavia used to be a very beautiful country with much to offer tourism, history, the arts and music as well as industry. [It’s suspected that Franz Joseph Haydn had some Croat blood in him.]
ADHD says
To John Prewett and Rasanin:
I’ll be the last – and I’m sure the writer of the above article would concur with me – to deny that there’s DEFINITE evidence against both the Vatican AND Germany, particularly during World War II!!
The Ustaše (plural of Ustaša, from Ustanak – meaning “uprising”) were indeed the fascist governors of the puppet “Nezavisna Država Hrvacka” (“Independent State of Croatia”, with the abbreviation NDH being very commonly used), which was one of the most stalwart allies of the Nazi-Germans. Many of the Catholic Church hierarchy, including the Croatian Primate at the time (Archbishop Alojzije Viktor Stepinac of Zagreb – his initially-warm support of the Ustaša government headed by Ante Pavelić cooled after they killed his brother), were quite sympathetic and often even enthusiastic supporters of that régime; and a number thereof (particularly those of the Franciscan order of monks and nuns!) even served as torturers and executioners, notably at the Jasenovac concentration camp (at which it’s estimated that 500,000 Serbs perished under atrocious conditions!!!).
On the other hand (according to Wikipedia – not the most reliable resource, alas), Stepinac did try to – and successfully did – save many Jews from the Nazis’ hands; and he finally also undertook measures to protect the Serb minority, though with at-least initially considerable reluctance. [The Great Schism of 1054 (when Catholicism and Orthodoxy split) to him was worse than the Protestant Reformation.]
In any case, one thing I believe was missed in the open letter at the time – and which has displayed evidence only now being truly recognised – is that NATO, notably including the USA and the UK, was very likely bribed into what it did against the Serbs by Muslim (especially Arab) money to intervene in the case of the Kosovar-Albanians and the Boshñaci (properly spelled Bošnjaci). While there no doubt was anti-Serb sympathy from Germany including Austria plus Switzerland (and the Catholic Church MIGHT have had some involvement too), the real cause of the attacks upon Serbia in 1999 were due to Muslim worldwide work on behalf of their comrades in the former Yugoslavia.
[The money no doubt – if what I suspect is correct! – came above all from the rich bigwigs of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and the Emirates, with other rich Muslims doing what they could as required by the rules of Islâmic charity (“zakat”), which mandate in this way the funding of worldwide war (“jihad”) for the advancement of Islâm.]
If what I’ve stated above is the truth (and which no doubt was what got Bush to let a large number of members and servants of the Saudi royal family present in the USA at the time of the 2001/09/11 attacks!!), then we all the more realise how much we now have to BEWARE Muslim money!!!!
[For pronunciation purposes: š = “sh” (as in “shore”), ć and č = “ch” (as in “church” – though the first letter evokes a lighter, softer sound in fact), ž = “zh” as in “pleasure”.]
Rasanin says
The fact is that it is germany that along with the UD are creating situations in the Balkans of which Croatia is best of pals…remember the 90’s croatian song danke deutscheland for backing u against the serbs just as they are backing the albaninas today?
Get real!
ADHD says
[NB, in the Serbian and Croat languages, if there’s no “hachek” on top of a “c” (which would change it into a “ch”, as in “church”), one pronounces the “c” as “ts” like in “bolts” or “Tsar”.]
I do remember there being a big conflict around the city of Mostar (where the famous Turkish-built bridge was demolished – subsequently restored) between the Croats and the Boshñaci (see last paragraph of this posting). These latter are the Bosnian Muslims – i.e., Muslimised Serbs who accepted Islâm and truly became the pawns and servants of the Turks, and who consequently are regarded by the Serb Orthodox as traitors similar to what Philippe Pétain and Pierre Laval were of Vichy-France in World War II.
It’s about them – the Boshñaci – that the bitter Serb proverb “Poturica je gore od Turčina” (“one Turkified is worse than a {real} Turk”) was/is said. [An Italian equivalent against English people is “Un inglese italianato è un diavolo incarnato,” meaning “an Italianised Englishman is a devil incarnate.”] No wonder in either case: when somebody seeks to belong to a group in which he doesn’t really fit, he often goes further in trying to prove himself than somebody who has belonged all along, particularly in terms of rejecting those reckoned as the “enemy”.
Presumably it’s that conflict to which “redhawk1989” is referring – and it WAS very bitter, so much so that even now to call between the two halves of Mostar means calling long-distance; while the people on each side regard the other side as the “enemy”.
However, to say that ALL Serbs never defended the Christian West is sheer and utter CALUMNY that flies in the face of all the evidence!!! It grieves me big-time to see that even here one’s forced to note the historical hatred between the Catholic Croats and the mostly-Orthodox Serbs (though there is a Catholic-Serb minority). After all, the Croats and Serbs share pretty well the same language (both now using the Latin alphabet, even though Serbs historically used the Cyrillic alphabet used by Russia, the Ukraine and Bulgaria), the same ethnicity and the same customs. Finally, one of my very best friends is half-Croat and half-Austrian.
Either way, it’s worth knowing that Bósnia-Hercegóvina is the scene of a THREE-WAY conflict between the Croats, Serbs and Boshñaci (proper plural of Bóshñak).
Rasanin says
The thing is, was it not the Croats that called the Bosnian muslims – “Your Flower” during the 2nd world war. Was it not croats that allied with the muslims true and proper forming fascist muslim Ustasi (croat led) divisions?
perceptor1 says
Let the truth be told at the International Criminal Tribunal.
ICE says
Since when is the killing Christians on the wrong side. Look at HAJI HILLARY and the Muslim Brotherhood. Go Gal!
FreedomInAmerica says
Reason #1,000,001 not to vote for Hillary Clinton 2012.
(NOBAMA 2012 is a given)
redhawk1989 says
Why you don’t publish the story of the Bosnian Croats which have died and bled against the Islamic enemy in B-H?
ADHD says
Your hatred of your brother-people the Serbs is most lamentable!! Let’s face it: Croats and Serbs share the same ethnic stock, same language, many of the same customs and much else. Only religion really differentiates the two; particularly now that the Serb people are more than proficient in the Latin alphabet thanks, for better and for worse, to Tito.
May God Have Mercy upon you and awaken your heart…
ADHD says
While I’m at it, there is one person who I CAN mention as an important leader against the Turks and so give credit to Croats as may indeed be their hero: the Hungarians claim him as Jan Zrinyi and the Croats as Ban Nikola Zrinskij.
He was the leader of 600 Hungarian, Austrian, Croat and other soldiers (many of them mercenaries) who sacrificed themselves to the last man at the fortress of Szigetvar in Hungary in an effort to stop Suleiman “the Magnificent” and his many tens of thousands of Turks from reaching Vienna in 1566. [After the failed siege of Malta in 1564, Suleiman was quite angry, saying that he had to lead personally to wage successful war against the West; thus, he embarked in his old age upon what would have been his second attack upon Austria (the first was in 1529).]
Although the fortress DID fall and virtually all the people in it were massacred, the Sultan Suleiman DIED just the day before, so the Turks retreated on account of their having to take Suleiman’s body back to Constantinople plus the infighting of eligible heirs that all too often would accompany the death of one sultan and the accession of a successor. Thus, the sacrifice of those Christian soldiers was not in vain.
redhawk1989 says
The real story is of the Bosnian Croats which have defended the West from the Islamic enemy during the Croat-Bosniak War (1993-1994).According to resouces 1606 Croats were killed while 150000 fled Central Bosnia because Alija Izetbegović declared war against them.
As for the Serbs they are the paws of the Turks and they have never defended the Christian West.
ADHD says
NEVER???? Have you forgotten the Battle of Kosovo Pólje (Field of the Blackbirds) on 1389/06/28, where the Serbs lost their freedom? Also, what about Mílosh Kóbilich, the Serb knight who assassinated the Turkish Sultan Murad III? [His successor Bajazet took over right on that battlefield…]
I should have responded much earlier to your anti-Serb drivel, but thought a joint reply would be sufficient. [You come across as an Ústasha nationalist, sad to say…]
Michael says
Redhawk you are another Croat who wants to take Serb glory.Croats as defenders?Are you kidding?The very reason Croats hate Serbs is because Serbs were given free status by Austro-hungary as Krajina defenders.Croats as defenders! Huh! Just as Croats think Tesla is Croat.Keep dreaming lackeys!
Buck Rogers says
HUMANITY must take swift physical action against these vomitous vermin…
REMOVE THEM FROM YOUR COUNTRY…
DO NOT BE FOOLED…
THESE ARE YOUR HAPPY, LOVING, PEACEFUL moozlims…
They infiltrate with deception…
They infiltrate to get close for the KILL…
It’s in their BOOK (koran)…
moehamed was a pedophile rapist
islam is the edict of the DEVIL…allah is SATAN…
And they want to inflict it on the WORLD.
Claes Rothe Vejloe says
I have read the whole story now and fully support the serbs.
dragonfFIRE01 says
Gosh I had no idea i only knew a very little.Frankly i don’t understand how this “religion” ever got taken seriously in the first place.
jimbo says
I think the awareness of the islamic cultism that is coming about in the world is being realized. Thanks to BNI and other media outlets. I’m not a predator, but I’m trying to be more aware of what goes on around my surroundings and start preparing a defense for islam. Probably a violent defense plan. That’s all that can stem the flow of muslim cultism.
skippinggirl says
BNI thank you for posting this article.
It is good to be able to read something which is not mainstream blabber.
Since discovering the truth about islam and all its glory, world events make much more sense.
budgie says
This is whats happening in the UK muslim hoards moving in and the goverment of the day allowing it,even encouraging it,Brits moving out, and Muslims now asking for areas to be given to them so they can set up their own goverment within ,,History repeating itself..,But NFSE…
fitzhugh fanny says
Unfortunately it does validate the fact that evil doers promote other evil doers and that continues around the world today in ever increasing numbers of innocents being slaughtered.
There is not even one tiny redeeming factor to be found in any muslime – IF there were, that muslime would be on an exterminate ad lib list or already dead.
For those former muslimes who have seen the truth and turned from that evil cult, only those of high public profile survive and even they are aware that at any moment they could be involved in a deadly “accident”.
Islamists is just another name for murderers.
sirius says
It is all over the same: Balkan whole Europe,Africa,Asia……..Mohammedanism can’t be respected,anyway where!!! Mohammedanism is the enemy of liberty!
John Prewett says
More insidious and powerful enemy of the Serbs was/is Vatican.
scratches surface: http://www.mosquitonet.com/~prewett/balklist.html
ADHD says
While not denying that the Vatican could indeed be guilty of plenty: for this entire Yugoslav mess, starting in 1990 or thereabouts, I’ll dare say that the rich Moslems (e.g., Saudi “Prince” Sultan bin Talal bin Saud) are even more responsible!!!
I’m certain that it was they that BRIBED the Clintons, Tony Blair and the others to go along with war against Christian Orthodox and Catholics in Bosnia-Hercegóvina as well as Kósovo-Metóhija. It is also these same Moslems – even poor countries like Sudan prefer to starve their people and let them languish in destitution while giving their money to finance jihad (that’s a MANDATORY part of Islamic “charity”!!!) – that are pushing us along towards a one-world ISLAMIC government (if they can manage it)!!!
They are using ANY and ALL means possible (bribing and/or intimidating politicians, civil-servants, bankers, union-executives, lawyers and prominent academics) to FORCE Islam down the throats of the rest of us by hook or by crook – and ANNIHILATE everything and everybody else for the sake of Mohammed their IDOL and his sock-puppet “allah”!!!!!
opar5 says
We can go earlier. The Janissary Corps: non-Muslim conscripts in Turkey, founded around 1365. These were healthy sons of dhimmi Christian Serb families, taken and forcibly converted to Islam to serve like Pretorian Guards for the Caliph, due to tribal distrust among Muslims. The same Muslims also took pretty Christian girls for sex slaves as another part of dhimmi Zakat to their masters. The Treaty of Umar is the model used for non-Muslims in Muslim lands. The Muslim abuse ran deep and for centuries – and our Western “leaders” foolishly believe peaceful co-existence is possible.
Jim 62 says
Thank you BNI, this helps a lot..