UK Court says, Muslim baby at risk of being 'honor' killed must be adopted
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: Religion of Hate 32 Comments »A baby at risk of becoming the victim of an ‘honor’ killing because she was born as the result of her unmarried Muslim mother’s secret affair must be adopted to keep her safe. Problem is, under Islam, legal adoption is forbidden for Muslims.
Qur’an 33.4 - “God did not make your adopted son as your own sons. To declare them so is your empty claim. God’s word is righteous and constitutes true guidance.”
TIMES Live (H/T Maria) Three senior judges rejected a bid by the one-year-old girl’s natural father to have her live with him and his wife. The child’s natural mother is in favour of adoption so that her own family will not find out about the birth.
The judges imposed unusually wide reporting restrictions banning the publication of all names and locations linked to the case because of the continuing dangers faced by mother and child.
The appeal court rejected an appeal by the father ‘F’ against a decision last July refusing him a residence order allowing the baby to live with him. The judge ordered that ‘baby Q’ should be adopted by a couple, also Muslim, from the same country as the mother, but from a different community. (Not possible, see video below)
BECAUSE ISLAM BANS ADOPTION, MUSLIM ORPHANAGES ARE OVERFLOWING
She found there would be “a very significant risk of two and two being put together” if the child went to the father because Q was quite obviously not the child of his wife, who had a child of her own.
If the child’s maternal grandfather found out about the affair “it would be a matter of intense almost unimaginable shame to him and his family”, said the judge. The appeal court said on Wednesday: “It 
was plainly the judge’s view that this might provoke a murder of the child and or mother to preserve the family’s honour.” The mother had consented to the adoption by the couple, who had been looking after her since December 2010.
The appeal judges said Q was conceived in a relationship “which was unacceptable to M’s traditional Muslim family and conducted in secrecy”. When M realised she might be pre
gnant she ran away from home. She was “terrified” over how her family would react. As soon as Q was born, she gave her daughter up for adoption because she “genuinely feared for Q’s safety should (her father) become aware of, or forced to acknowledge, her existence”.
Q’s grandmother had told the police that, if her husband found out about the child, “he would consider himself honour-bound to kill the child, the mother, the grandmother herself and the grandmother’s other children”.
Upholding Mrs Justice Parker’s decision to make an adoption order, the appeal judges said: “The mother’s evidence, supported as it was by her actions, and the evidence of [the father] and an experienced police officer, drove the judge to conclude that refusal of the order would carry with it a significant risk of physical harm.
Adoption of an orphan/helpless child was a very popular and moral practice amongst pre-Islamic Arabs. But the Prophet Muhammad forbade the Arab practice of adopting children as one’s own. Islam removes all the adopted son’s actual rights (his name, inheritance, property, right to be considered as a part of the family). One can care for an orphan in fostering capcity, but it is considered as an act of kindness and not real family and there can never be any legal relationship.
Some Islamic states have taken this narrowly, and are not even permitted to foster a child in the home. Other states, such as Egypt permit fostering in the home, but the parents are forced to evict the child at the first sign of puberty. So the 13 year old teens and tweens get put on the street or sent to an orphanage mill, or just plain kicked out and told to go away. Sick.
Yes, there is no adoption in Islam. However, they are living in UK now, so it may be the prospective adoptive parents have integrated to that extent, that they are willing to live by
British law. I hope it’s not a miscalculation.
GOD the creator did allow adoptions and encouraged them. For instance the adoption of Josephs children, Ephraim and Manasseh, by the Grandfather Jacob (Israel) which brought the covenants of POWER and Wealth to the fore. So all this means is allah is not a god bu anti-creation. So I take Love over Hate any day.
I don’t care if it is Haram or not; get that baby out of that place. Let a nice Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, or atheist couple adopt the poor little soul. Muslims are cruel and do not treat their children as they should.
this one sick bunch of people to deprive these children a home. but they way they believe . I suppose it is better for the child. wish I could adopt her and to show true love that all children should know and understand
What is “dr. zakir naik” wearing some kind of half-baked condom on his head in this video??? I didn’t know this clown was an expert adoption laws, and he’s an expert on science too. Hey “dr.” are you paying attention to what NASA and and the Kepler telescope has shared with us the last few weeks??? Oh, I forgot it’s all in the koran!!!!
I couldn’t believe this was happening in Britain–a point I’ve raised in any MSM dailys. It’s another pathetic example of just how far Britain has gone down the road to total dhimmitude.
The more I learn the less I understand.
if those cretins don’t want the child & it is in danger of being murdered, why can’t the british gov’t remove the child & offer it to a british family? case closed…
Will they ever learn that what the worship (Allah) was only a mad warlord back in 650 AD and copied the Torah/Bible which was written in 70 BC. To have some sort of laws (sharia) for them to follow after it was edited to his mad ways. No real God would ever teach what they believe! They are blind and brainwashed from birth!!!
Religion of love lol. Islam and Mohamed is a pile of shit. Children are not spared their hate.
Ali Sina, author of “Understanding Muhammad – A Psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet” wrote:
The reason that Islam forbids adoption is not because of some obscure theological argument, but simply because Mohammed, the ‘Perfect Man’ and role model for all Muslims, screwed his daughter-in-law!
Now having sex with your daughter-in-law is illegal and incestuous (hence the term daughter-in-law) in most societies, just as it was in pre-Islamic Arabia. So Mohammed could have been regarded by his contemporaries as a sick and twisted old pervert, if it wasn’t for some revelations from Allah that came just in the nick of time.
Mohammed had adopted a boy called Zaid, who later married a beautiful girl named Zainab. But the dirty old lecher Mohammed couldn’t keep his filthy paws off Zainab, so he forced Zaid to divorce her. But there was one problem: according to Arab custom Zainab was still his daughter-in-law, so he couldn’t have his wicked way with her. Then miraculously, Allah revealed a new law to Mohammed, that adoption was illegal and all previous adoptions null and void. So Zainab was not, and never had been Mohammad’s daughter-in-law http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2011/03/why-muslims-are-forbidden-to-adopt.html .
Their prophet had an adopted son, but Mohammed managed an unexpected visit and saw his daughter-in-law in scanty clothes. His lust for her was contradictory to Arabic custom and laws on incest. The adopted son, however, was so terrified of Mohammed’s lust and unpredictable nature that he divorced his sexy wife, and Mohammed had Allah proclaim there was no relation (Koran 33:4 and 5), and married her himself. The “perfect copy” (Koran) of the eternal book that has been beside Allah in paradise since the beginning of time somehow, when returned to the order Mohammed dictated it, managed to address every one of Mohammed’s daily concerns and desires that violated law, custom and even previous Koranic edicts (dealt with by the compiler, who had no idea of the proper order, with Koran 2:106) as they arose, according to his most-trusted biography.
Pssssst, Muslims aren’t supposed to know this and cannot ask (called “fitna”) under threat of death!
The Bible tells us to take care of widows and Orphans. Allah’s followers have proven to us time and time again that thesis not a priority. What does a widow with no male relatives do in Afghanistan? She starves because she’s not allowed out without a male to accompany her and keep her in line. Orphans wind up living on the streets, being sexually abused by the muzzie males. Honestly, these “people” (I use that term loosely) make me sick!
This is so horrendous, these poor kids. Yet another facet of the nightmare world of Islam that the dhimmis and taqiyya peddlers are working overtime to hide from the kafirs.
Somewhat OT but here is the latest on the Aisha Khan “abduction” case. Nancy Grace was on HLN confronting the girl’s lying taqiyya jockey weasel of a cousin who claimed that her marriage was a love match. Grace made him admit that the husband is from Pakistan, lived there until 6 months ago when he moved here, and has been married to Aisha for 5 months. So yes, it was an “arranged” marriage. Apparently it was also “practically the eve of her honeymoon” which the family is, of course, denying.
Did this girl run for her life or is she the victim of yet another “honor” crime? Apparently the police are claiming she was abducted, but construction workers in the area claim they saw her strolling away by herself. She left cell phone messages claiming a drunk/stoner was threatening her and who she claims to have slapped and who ran away, but she never called 911. As Grace points out, her voice does not sound frightened on the call. Grace and others on the show are confronting this taqiyya-spouting cousin who is now claiming that “in our culture the bride can accept or reject the groom with no problem at all”. Grace is not letting him get away with it.
This is the link to the HLN site with the earlier coverage:
http://www.hlntv.com/article/2011/12/21/relative-says-missing-college-student-was-not-forced-marriage
The evil perversion of mohamed to enact laws to meet his every evil and twisted desires, such as to outlaw adoptions so that he could sexually assault his now, thanks to allah, no longer daughter in law by the decree of allah that came just in time for mohamad to fulfill his evils lust for his now ex daughter in law. I can see why sick and savage muslims follow the pervert mohamad.
I recently read that teachers were upset that a child in america had to cover her ears at kindergarten because muslimes should not listen to music. Teacher are liberals and it is these liberals that created this we love muslims shit so to occur so why complain when muslimes demand muslim ways and practises. Here we have the same liberals unhappy about mislimes behaviour in this case possible murder. These liberals too created this by having and supporting multiculture. Now they complain things maybe not right with muslim ways. We will see more and more of these soft liberals start to realise the dangers of islam as it demands more and more. We should be going after the liberals and highlight their inconsistancy. Leave the child, let them see how wonderful islam is. After all it’s the religion of peace so why worry. Stop defending/supporting the liberals because by for their mistakes . Highlight the effect of multiculture and its dangers that liberals cause even if it hurts innocent muslims. Let them kill the child. Why are you so bothered, most of you and me included hate muslims anyway. Or is it because it is an inoccent child and we must/ have a duty to help. I don’t know its a tough one but this compansion may actually get us all killed in the end.
no wonder all these people are crazy. this fool was beset by imaginary people
Islam causes endless misery.
So much is wrong with Islam, it cannot be valid.
So much is wrong with Islam, it must be false.
They make me sick too, CWW! BNI, you are right to file this under “religion of hate.” They hurt children, women, and anyone else they can possibly get their hands on who do not buy in to their evil ways. The guy in the video sounds like the devil. His reasoning is that of a raving lunatic: he reeks of hatred and control. I’m just wondering: What is the guy holding in his hand in the picture with all of those poor children on the floor? It looks like he’s about to hit one of the children?
Listening to that clown explain his precise and ridiculous reasons that adoption is banned with all its convoluted calculations on dividing the booty when daddy dies, it is the mohammedans that have adopted 1984 orweillian logic far beyond the pathetic West’s example. I thought we were doing Orwell nicely, but Islam has rules, rules, stupid rules.
So here comes this educated Muslim to America, enjoys all the freedoms but despises the kafir. It’s a total disconnect. Islam is a secretion of the Arab mind. -http://www.wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_the_Psychology_of_the_Musulman
The “Umdat al-Saliq” or “Reliance of the Traveller”, is a manual of Islamic law certified in 1991 as a reliable guide to Sunni Islam by Cairo’s renowned al-Azhar University, the most prestigious and authoritative institute of Sunni Islamic jurisprudence in the world. This manual, composed in the 14th century,states that punishment or “retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right” Except when “a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers)” kills their “offspring, or offspring’s offspring” (section o1.1-2). In other words, a parent who murders his/her child for the sake of honour, is not penalized under Islamic law or Shariah.
The Umdat al-Saliq was also endorsed by the Muslim Brotherhood-linked International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) in the United States. In the opening pages, the IIIT writes “there is no doubt that this translation is a valuable and important work, whether as a textbook for teaching Islamic jurisprudence to English speakers, or as a legal reference for use by scholars, educated laymen, and students in this language.” The Umdat al-Saliq is by no means an irrelevant or outdated document, and its rulings, including those on the subject of retaliation for murder, are legally binding and not subject for debate.
Another text that supports the immunity for parents who kill their children was written by the Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini (1902-1989), an authority of Shiite Islam . In his book “Resaleh Towzih Al-Massael” or “A Clarification of Questions” Khomeini specifies under “conditions of retaliation” (section 2.3 of Appendix II) that there is no penalty for a father who kills his child, the father will simply not be punished under Islamic law. A killer is punished if: “The slayer is not the father of the slain, nor the parental grandfather”.
There is a report from Pakistan that 675 women and girls were murdered there to protect their families’ honor during the past nine months alone.
http://www.theaustralian.com.a…6227064723
I still wonder how Islam and the Islamic world can survive. They treat their women like trash, and they also treat their orphan children like garbage. How can a culture that treats its lifebearers and its future this way survive? This baffles me. Such unbelievable cruelty.
Steve, that culture is fundamentally evil and righteousness will eventually triumph over it.
I am with you Linda. In fact, all children shoud be taken from Muslim parents. They have to stop the inbreeding. It has turned them into sociopaths and pathological liars and donkey humpers. The amount of badly deformed children born to Muslims would shock you. Those that are not so physically deformed, are turned into Omams. te he he.
I fucking hate koranimals. Just when I think I have heard it all how fucking sick these inbred, brain dead sub humans are, out pops a new monstrosity.
I. Hate. Them.
Stop focusing on Islam the problem is Liberals. Muslims cannot survive in the west without liberal policies. Get rid of liberal policies and real policies to remove muslims, take away benefits, stop mosque building, donot give them air time, stop sharia, get rid of TSA and on it goes. The muslim problem will go when they are not tolerated by liberal thinkers.
Islam has discarded civilization and made people into primitive animals.It’s a sickness.
Well guys it now appears that old MO was not breast fed as a child !! I think the liberal shrinks would give you an answer as to why this pig craved love and attention,and the need to have multiple women,and children to have sex with,in his little mind he wanted to go back to the womb..So even the Arabs that were with him as he grew up thought he was a nutter !!! Some things just never change,,,
Fuck the Muslims and their non-adoption ‘rules’
They are free here to fuck their own children, so wtf?
Totally screwed up.
Get all the poor children all out of the effing Muslim countries, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi, Sudan, etc. and blow the living HELL OUT OF THEM.
Being this case is in Britain, it should be adjudicated under British law, not the demented twisted ****ing perverted Sharia Law set up by the ASSLIFTERS’ prophet Muhammad in the Seventh Century; being Islam is SUPPOSED to be the “religion of peace”, though anyone in his right mind can see that IS NOT the case, then they should most certainly allow for the adoption of this child who had nothing to do with the planning of his own birth!! Let him be adopted by non-muslim parents’, people who will genuinely care for the child as THEIR OWN and NOT be more concerned about an ILLEGITIMATE set of ASSLIFTER rules handed down by a false prophet and ****ing thief, liar, pedophile, rapist AND murderer who claimed himself a prophet!!!….But any devout asslifter WILL CERTAINLY NOT follow any legitimate line of reasoning so, to the asslifters of Islam: PISS BE UPON YOU!!!
UK court, this MIGHT provoke a murder? In America, one of the colonies that kissed you off, at bayonet point, one of our BASIC legal principles is, that NO one EVER knows what ANYONE will do in the future, freedom of choice and all that rot, doncha know. And just WHERE, in your delusional UK, would you send that child? Surely not to one of those areas which British police have too much sense to attempt to police! You clowns have backed yourselves into a corner. You admit that mohammadanism is a murderous cult which would slaughter a baby, and there is NOWHERE in your diminishing area of power in which you are able to protect it. Yet you still protect mohammadanism. I would allow the Queen Mother sanctuary in America, but only if she wore a burka when disembarking. She may immediately burn that symbol of shame, but she MUST wear it when she first touches FREE soil!