←
→

Is Barack Obama forcing military leaders to lie about so-called ‘progress’ in Afghanistan?

Posted: February 9, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: Military stories |53 Comments »

Apparently, at least one whistleblower and several members of Congress think so.

53 Comments on “Is Barack Obama forcing military leaders to lie about so-called ‘progress’ in Afghanistan?”

  1. Guy Macher says:
    February 9, 2012 at 6:21 pm

    It’s not a lie if it’s takiya!

    Reply
  2. Susan K says:
    February 9, 2012 at 6:29 pm

    He’s been leaking information about Israel and Iran through Panetta and friends, so nothing surprises me anymore about him.

    He’s quite the sneaky person.

    I feel sorry for the Afghan women. They will be paying the price for Obama’s reelection lies.

    Reply
    • Therese says:
      February 12, 2012 at 8:16 pm

      Dont forget Susan, women dont count for anything in Islam. So what would he care?

      The women have always paid a high price for freedom. In Salam four hundred years ago there were witch-burnings, so it is nothing new for women. However, every woman has a responsible to do what she can to remind us as a society they we are never too far away from this. Never.

      Reply
  3. Upaces says:
    February 9, 2012 at 6:32 pm

    How do you help people who are Legally insane from breeding with each other. Answer? You can’t.

    They are literally, de-evolving.

    IF they were “evolving”, the would have grown to be any different now vs. the year of 634 A.D.

    Reply
  4. Upaces says:
    February 9, 2012 at 6:42 pm

    Susan, please expand on your thoughts.

    Reply
    • Susan K says:
      February 9, 2012 at 8:50 pm

      http://www.israelunitycoalition.org/news/?p=7753

      Reply
      • barenakedislam says:
        February 9, 2012 at 9:33 pm

        Sorry, Susan, I don’t believe for a second that Israel told Panetta of their real plans. They never have told of their attack plans before, even when they had a friend in the WH, why start now with a known enemy. I have no doubt they probably told Panetta what he repeated, but I believe it is nothing more than disinformation that they wanted Iran to hear.

        Reply
      • fredflintstone says:
        February 10, 2012 at 1:40 am

        It would not serve Israeli interests to disclose any information of a military nature to the obama administration

        Reply
        • Therese says:
          February 12, 2012 at 8:21 pm

          You got that one right Fred. No country is safe from the President with the big lips. Taqiyya is all around us and some governments think America is the same as it always was and leave out the Islamic ideals now possessed by the agenda of a president.

          Reply
  5. Boundaries says:
    February 9, 2012 at 6:43 pm

    Wouldn’t surprise me at all if Obama is forcing leaders to lie. After all, we’re dealing with the Liar-in-Chief and he doesn’t deal with something as trivial as the truth. He reacts to truth like vampires in the movies react to sunlight.

    Reply
  6. marcia says:
    February 9, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    Are they telling us the truth about Afghanistan? It’s OBAMA, do we really have to ask?

    Reply
    • barenakedislam says:
      February 9, 2012 at 7:07 pm

      Marcia, then he should pull all the troops out of Afghanistan right now, as long as he’s giving the country back to the Taliban. He should be on trial for Treason on so many counts.

      Reply
      • NikitaAnne says:
        February 9, 2012 at 7:55 pm

        BNI, I am not overly familiar with American laws…why hasn’t Obama been charged with treason?

        Reply
        • barenakedislam says:
          February 9, 2012 at 8:29 pm

          No one has tried. Not that you could ever get criminal AG Eric Holder to charge the muslim-in-chief with anything.

          Reply
        • Ret. Marine says:
          February 10, 2012 at 7:03 am

          That’s a no-brainer, as we tell it. It’s (why has he not been tried for treason) because he has total control with the Senate, they are the ones who hold the trial, with “dingy harry” at the helm. They don’t look at it as TREASON, because they are in on the plan along with the rest of their buddies, islam, progressives, OWS (obam’s willing slaves, of ignorance) demonrat party. Of course the House is responsible for the enactment of the articles of impeachment, by why try, they know ol’s dingy is not going to allow it to happen, it matters not to them even if it is thr TRUTH, that’s why.

          Reply
      • ICE says:
        February 9, 2012 at 8:05 pm

        YUP!

        Reply
  7. Wiserthanher says:
    February 9, 2012 at 7:39 pm

    WHAT !!? Our leader tell us a lie…. I didn’t even see a teleprompter. This has “shaken me to the core” NOT !!

    Reply
  8. ICE says:
    February 9, 2012 at 8:06 pm

    I’ll post the legal terms for those that have missed them.

    IF THE SHOE FITS????

    DEFINITION OF tyrant
    In common usage, the word “tyrant” carries connotations of a harsh and cruel ruler who places his or her own interests or the interests of a small oligarchy over the best interests of the general population, which the tyrant governs or controls.
    treason
    · Violation of allegiance toward one’s country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one’s country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.
    · A betrayal of trust or confidence.
    Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/treason#ixzz1QsLrbdUd
    Oran’s Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as “…[a]…citizen’s actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation].” In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour.
    sedition In law, sedition is overt conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority to tend toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel. A seditionist is one who engages in or promotes the interests of sedition.
    High crimes and misdemeanors is a phrase from Section 4 of Article Two of the United States Constitution: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
    “High” in the legal parlance of the 18th century means “against the State”. A high crime is one which seeks the overthrow of the country, which gives aid or comfort to its enemies, or which injures the country to the profit of an individual or group. In democracies and similar societies it also includes crimes which attempt to alter the outcome of elections.
    An alien who is present in a country (which is foreign to him/her) unlawfully or without the country’s authorization is known as an illegal alien of that country.[2] An illegal alien commonly refers to a foreign national who resides in another country unlawfully, either by entering that country at a place other than a designated port-of-entry or as result of the expiration of a non-immigrant visa. An enemy alien is an alien who is a national of an enemy country.
    Malfeasance the performance by a public official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing (used especially of an act in violation of a public trust).
    Nonfeasance is to ignore and take no indicated action – neglect. Misfeasance is to take inappropriate action or give intentionally incorrect advice. Malfeasance is hostile, aggressive action taken to injure the client’s interests.
    Example: A company hires a catering company to provide drinks and food for a retirement party. If the catering company doesn’t show up, it’s considered nonfeasance. If the catering company shows up but only provides drinks (and not the food, which was also paid for), it’s considered misfeasance. If the catering company accepts a bribe from its client’s competitor to undercook the meat, thereby giving those present food poisoning, it’s considered malfeasance.

    Sabotage is a deliberate action aimed at weakening another entity through subversion, obstruction, disruption, or destruction. In a workplace setting, sabotage is the conscious withdrawal of efficiency generally directed at causing some change in workplace conditions. One who engages in sabotage is a saboteur.
    The RICO Act focuses specifically on racketeering, and it allows for the leaders of a syndicate to be tried for the crimes which they ordered others to do or assisted them, closing a perceived loophole that allowed someone who told a man to, for example, murder, to be exempt from the trial because they did not actually do it.
    RICO is codified as Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961–1968. While its original use was to prosecute the Mafia as well as others who were actively engaged in organized crime, its application has been more widespread.
    It has been speculated that the name and acronym were selected in a sly reference to the movie Little Caesar, which featured a notorious gangster named Rico.

    LET NO MAN SAY, HE DOES NOT KNOW!

    Reply
    • Grouchy Fogie says:
      February 9, 2012 at 8:55 pm

      Thank You, ICE, for putting everything together in one post~! For clarity and brevity, I don’t think it can be beat~!

      Reply
    • dragonfFIRE01 says:
      February 9, 2012 at 10:54 pm

      ICE
      Very thorough, bu the house of Representatives who has the power to impeach or bring charges as specified in your post doesn’t have the BALLS or the will to do anything, because the Senate would never approve. but the Senate isn’t needed CONGRESS IS AFRAID

      Reply
      • Dajjal says:
        February 10, 2012 at 3:29 am

        Sorry, Dragonfire, a Bill of Impeachment requires a 2/3 majority in the House of Representatives. The Republicans do not have enough members, and I doubt not that several would vote against the bill.

        Conviction in the Senate requires a 2/3 majority vote, impossible with the GOP in the minority. Even if it were begun today, the election would be over before the impeachment process.

        Reply
      • ronyvo says:
        February 10, 2012 at 6:13 am

        True. After that comes WE THE PEOPLE. This individual in the WH is criminal. But, the problem is with the people who put him in power.
        Ignorance is very dangerous especially in a time of war.

        Reply
      • Rip says:
        February 10, 2012 at 10:11 am

        I hear that the house is dependent on the Senate to accomplish impeachment, is that true ? if not then we have a bunch of cowards doing our bidding.. The only problem being that to impeach would lend an air of credibility to the Usurper, he only need be arrested and charged with treason and sedition ………

        Reply
        • Ret. Marine says:
          February 11, 2012 at 6:42 am

          Word has it that Sherrif Joe Arpiro, out in Arizona and his cold case posse will spill the beans on this usurper-n-thief, come March. 1st. I think we are going to see some vey interesting things come out about this. Pray for Joe’s protection, pray for the sake of our Nation and pray we make it to the next election date, without that ” don’t let a good crises go to waste” description of this lawless regime over our heads, don’t put it past this fraud to enact a “false flag operation” just to give everyone he is trying to cover for the escape route he, and they, by then will despertly need. Semper FI.

          Reply
  9. Dajjal says:
    February 9, 2012 at 8:13 pm

    Truth is the second casualty in war. An infamous God damn Liar said that “Islam is a great religion of peace.” and that he was going to liberate Afghanistan and make it free & democratic.

    It is not possible to convert a Goddamned Islamic satrapy into a liberal democracy without first eliminating Islam’s yoke of slavery from its people.

    “Win their hearts and minds” is SnakeShit because they have been deracinated; they are zombies.

    Had I been President in ’01, I would have issued this statement: “You have 24 hours to surrender Usama bin Ladin and his gang. In 24 hours, we will have them or you will have one less city. We will nuke one city each day until you turn them over.”

    The invasion was a damned fool’s errand because the outcome was predictable. There is no substitute for victory. Against Islam, victory is eradication.

    Others will not show you this; I will because I do not give a damn who I offend. Truth hurts; suck it up; grit your teeth and bear it.

    Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
    cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
    of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
    of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent’s
    Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
    spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
    produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
    spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy,
    it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
    invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
    to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has
    the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
    us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
    strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
    be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
    that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
    and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
    is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
    equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
    today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
    must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.
    http://wolfpangloss.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/malik-quranic-concept-of-war.pdf#page=51

    You can not defeat Muslims without first destroying their faith unless you kill them all, without sanctuary, remorse or reservation. If this fatal fact is not clear to you, re-read that quote from “The Qur’anic Concept of War” until reality sinks in and you fully comprehend it.

    Muslims are not defeated until they are dead or apostatized.

    You do not have “Muslim allies”. You do not have “Muslim partners” against terrorists. Islam is terrorism. Muslims are terrorists. Exactly what Goddamn part of 8:112, 57, 60; 33:26-27; 59:2, 13 and Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220 do you not comprehend? Exactly what Goddamn part of 60:1, 13, 4:89, 144, 5:51, 57, 3:28, 118 & 9:23 do you not understand? Those who assume that we win by training Afghanistani police & soldiers think with their assholes, not with brains; they are analencephalopaths.

    The rules of engagement imposed by Shrub & Obamination are designed for defeat, not for victory. The young men and women who lost limbs and lives were sacrificed on the altar of political correctness because our elected traitors will not admit the fact that victory means extermination when we are attacked by Muslims. Those AssWholes do not understand that “Never Again” applies to innocent people, not to genocidal aggressors. Exactly what Goddamn part of 8:67 & 47:4 do you not understand?

    Victory is an absolute necessity because anything less encourages Muslims, strengthens their faith, and invites repeated attacks. If you want to win, pull our men out and nuke Afghanistan off the face of the earth. Tell Pakistan and Iran that they can permanently close the terrorist training and staging areas or join their brothers in Hell.

    Up yor snout, CAIR! Go directly to Hell, do not pass GO, do not collect any funds. For the uninitiated: http://www.quranbrowser.com/ is an easy to use Qur’an search engine that displays a table of ten parallel translations for easy comparison. For example: in 60:1, 60 is the surah #, 1 is the ayeh #. The two hadith cited can be found by Googling the citations.

    Reply
    • barenakedislam says:
      February 9, 2012 at 8:50 pm

      Daj, sounds like a plan. Sadly no one in the West has the guts to follow it.

      Reply
      • Dajjal says:
        February 10, 2012 at 3:27 am

        Sadly, BNI, even the best of the current slate appear to lack the spinal fortitude. But, with the exception of Ron Paul, they are orders of magnitude superior to Obamination.

        Reply
    • opar5 says:
      February 9, 2012 at 9:06 pm

      Dajjal, What else needs to be said? Bodies of the country’s leadership and sychophants piled in the Capital square with a big sign reading: “Don’t make us come back!,” has been my suggestion.

      Reply
      • Dajjal says:
        February 10, 2012 at 3:25 am

        I do not approve of applying physical violence domestically. I view coups and rebellions as absolute last resort options.

        Now is the time to make sure that only Conservatives are nominated. In November, to make sure only Conservatives are elected.

        Reply
    • Shelley says:
      February 10, 2012 at 4:24 am

      Sounds pretty clear to me.

      Reply
  10. don siege says:
    February 9, 2012 at 8:31 pm

    we all know know that obama is a lying s.o.b. who will say anything to maintain his grip on power/authority.

    but is an al-jazeera report more trustworthy?

    Reply
    • barenakedislam says:
      February 9, 2012 at 8:53 pm

      don, sometimes they are, especially if they can make the US look bad. In this case, I believe they are right, if only because the MSM won’t touch this.

      Reply
  11. fitzhugh fanny says:
    February 9, 2012 at 8:49 pm

    The afghans are not ready for our Military to leave because they know the muslime demons are poised to take over which explains why obamanation and his elitist cronies have chosen now as the time to get us out.
    Kill two birds with one stone, get the taliban and muslime murderhood in and increase his own chances of re-election by the mentally incompetent, dole system and deceased voters ala chicago demorat styled politics.
    As for forcing the military big-wigs to lie – well ever since the 9/11 pentagon cover up, I suspect there are no men left there to protest – just a bunch of brass whimps.

    Reply
    • opar5 says:
      February 10, 2012 at 12:47 pm

      How could 9/11 have happened without the government-mandated “no resistance” policy toward hijackers the airlines were required to follow? The hijackers obviously knew there’d be no resistance and acted accordingly. Government solutions? HA!

      Reply
      • barenakedislam says:
        February 10, 2012 at 9:22 pm

        Opar, because that policy had always been successful in the past. Nobody could have anticipated what happened on 9/11 before 9/11.

        Reply
  12. opar5 says:
    February 9, 2012 at 8:51 pm

    We’re dealing with “lawful orders” under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Many unlawful orders are given, but refusing to obey can put the carreer of the unwilling in jeapordy, as performance evaluations by one’s superiors cannot normally be challenged, and commissioned officers are particularly vulnerable. If the refused order was deemed lawful, more than the carreer is in jeapordy, but jail will happen!

    Reply
    • Rip says:
      February 10, 2012 at 10:32 am

      Right, just look at what happened to Lt. Col. Terrance Lakin, forget the FACT that he was right, his superiors changed their performance evaluations to match the administrations lies and damn the Col.s career, it’s going to take a military takeover of the administration and every thing they have “touched” and keep U.S. and the constitution safe until we can have a coherent election process (and believe me, there are some major changes that need to be made)then the Only solution to the problem of islam must be as it was during the crusades, they knew what had to be done and they did it….. too bad they fell short of finishing the job………

      Reply
  13. BLR says:
    February 9, 2012 at 9:25 pm

    ask the tailban what is going on the son of a bitch obama put them in charge three years ago. I am shure cair has got there cell number .

    Reply
  14. Curlyhammed, Larryhammed and Moehammed says:
    February 9, 2012 at 11:11 pm

    Obama is doing the very best he knows how as an African tyrant who runs from truth.

    Reply
    • ADHD says:
      February 10, 2012 at 7:40 pm

      Probably not much of a point to note.

      It’s interesting nevertheless to note that Kenya and Somalia are neighbours. Given that Obama has been favouring Somali immigration on a huge scale (and almost all Somalis are Muslims!), that he apparently is from Kenya AND that Somalis are probably having a strong Arab component in their biological make-up: the odds are that he’s an Arab at least as much – if not more so! – as of black descent. [Personally, I definitely think of him as not of Negro origin at all, but strictly Arab - which would align perfectly with his likely being of Somali descent.]

      It also tallies perfectly with him being Muslim in his heart AND Communist in his head (by education – and as I’ve tried to point out a few times previously, beneath the surface one can find PLENTY in common between the two ideologies!!!) – the perfect combination of THE TWO WORST totalitarian philosophies of all time!!! This alone could make him an eventual Antichrist…

      Reply
  15. fredflintstone says:
    February 10, 2012 at 1:54 am

    The war in afghanistan has been going south since it started. When you have %80+ of the population that live and breath hatred, it is a simple fact that the war is unwinable fighting it in it’t current format. When and if our government refocuses its efforts on eliminating the “true” enemy (islam) progress can be achieved.

    Reply
  16. Dajjal says:
    February 10, 2012 at 3:30 am

    The link in the email notice went to endtimes, which reported 404,

    Also, the page takes a long time to refresh after posting a comment.

    Reply
  17. Ret. Marine says:
    February 10, 2012 at 7:09 am

    Every thing you need to know about why this pretender-n-thief regarding afghan, is lying to us all, just look up AFGHANREPORT.COM, pretty much explains, through the looking glasses of a Col. on active duty.

    Semper Fi, to all infidels and Patriots alike.

    Reply
  18. D.G says:
    February 10, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    Is Obummer lying?! Mmmmm, are his lips moving?!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

←
→