According to Palestinian-American Dean Obeidallah, “The Nigerian terrorist group, Boko Haram, who kidnapped hundreds of schoolgirls in Nigeria has nothing to do with Islam, and it’s grotesquely irresponsible of the media to suggest it does.” Now, that IS funny!
Perhaps not-so-funny boy can glance at a quran, where it says the taking of female slaves is permitted during jihad.
The Daily Beast Obeidallah (like his fellow Mohammedans at CAIR) demands that the media: Kindly stop referring to the Nigerian terrorist group Boko Haram as “Islamic terrorists,” “Islamists” or anything else involving the word “Islam.” The despicable acts taken by this militant group—from kidnapping schoolgirls to slaughtering people at churches and mosques—have absolutely nothing to do with Islam. In fact, as one well-known Imam told me, the claim by Boko Haram’s leader that its actions are based on Islamic principles is “blasphemy” of the worst kind. (Only if you consider the quran blasphemous)
Why do our media continually use terms like “Islamist” or “Islamic radical” to describe people or groups without doing the bare minimum investigation into whether there’s actually a connection between their conduct and Islam? (You better hope they never do) Instead, it appears that the media assume if the person is Muslim and claims he is acting in accordance the faith, that’s good enough for them. It shouldn’t be.
Here’s some real “breaking news”: Want to know how much of the violent acts committed by Boko Haram are based on Islamic principles? Nothing, nada, niente, rien, or any word you want to use for having no connection.
And this isn’t just my view. It’s what Muslims around the world having been saying for the past week as they have both denounced Boko Haram’s savagery and stated that Boko Haram’s actions are in no way sanctioned or supported by Islamic principles. (Oh, but they most certainly are. See below)
Clarion Project: In his own words, the leader of Boko Haram’s refutes everything Obeidallah has to say:
For example, he said:
“If we meet infidels, if we meet those that become infidels, according to Allah, there is not any talk except hitting of the neck. I hope you, chosen people of Allah, are hearing. This is an instruction from Allah. It is not a distorted interpretation. It is from Allah himself.”
He also cites Islamic sources when justifying Boko Haram’s kidnapping of the Nigerian girls. Slavery of one’s adversaries, he says, is permissible during a jihad. The captives are the booty of war. Shekau explains,
“There are slaves in Islam, you should know this, Prophet Muhammed took slaves himself during [the] Badr war.”
Shekau isn’t saying that it is permissible to take just anyone as a slave, but only those that belonged to the enemy. So how do these innocent girls qualify as seized enemy property? Because Shekau believes the jihad is not against an army, government or ethnic group but against Christianity, Western influence, democracy and Muslims that Boko Haram sees as impure.
Shekau declared“
“To the people of the world, everybody should know his status, it is either you are with us mujahideen or you are with the Christians.” He continues:
“We know what is happening in this world, it is a jihad war against Christians and Christianity. It is a war against Western education, democracy and constitution… This is what I know in Quran. This is a war against Christians and democracy and their constitution, Allah says we should finish them when we get them.”
Shekau’s view is substantiated by IslamWeb, a popular website that endorses Sheikh Yousef al-Qaradawi, the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood. In a 2002 fatwa (authoritative Islamic ruling), IslamWeb concludes:
“Islam left only one source for slavery that is enslavement in war and only legal war (i.e. against the non-Muslims). Indeed, the enslavement of prisoners of war was a part of warfare. So, Islam did not free the slaves of its enemies while its own followers are enslaved by those enemies and given the worst possible treatment.”
In another 2002 fatwa, IslamWeb specifies that females from the enemy camp can be taken as booty. It says:
“’The slaves that your right hand possesses’…includes the slave girls and slaves in general those who are under the control of a free Muslim. As a rule, the only channel of producing this segment of society is Jihad in the cause of Allah.”
In fatwa 10382, Islam Q & A states:
“It is permissible for you to take concubines from among those whom you seized as war booty,” regardless of if one has a spouse.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
saudi-arabia-foreign-workers-forced-to-live-in-slavery-like-conditions
horrific-tales-of-abuse-of-migrant-domestic-workers-by-arab-muslim-employers
islamic-slave-masters-saudi-arabia
the-culture-of-racism-against-black-domestic-help-in-lebanon-and-the-rest-of-the-arab-muslim-world
philippine-women-pay-the-ultimate-price-for-working-in-muslim-countries
migrant-domestic-workers-beaten-and-abused-by-lebanese-muslim-employers
lebanon-muslim-apartheid-policies-forbid-blacks-from-entering-swimming-pools
the-most-brutal-inhumane-slave-masters-in-history-were-not-white-men-they-were-muslims
RELATED DEAN O STORIES/VIDEOS:
hmmm-now-the-daily-beast-has-3rd-rate-muslim-comedians-writing-political-commentary
failed-muslim-lawyer-turned-third-rate-comedian-says-the-gop-has-a-muslim-problem
This whole article is complete bullshit and has no factual basis.
Nala, this is why you mohammadan supremacists are the most hated creatures on the planet.
You dislike this article and rather than offer a constructive rebuttal disproving it you simply have a tantrum and screech that it has “no factual basis.”
The facts that this article are based on are fatwas that are indeed on the islamweb site. All one has to do is follow the links provided in the article that declare is “bullshit” and see that these fatwas are on the islamweb site.
You may think the fatwas are bullshit and not based on fact, but your typical mohammadan rant makes it clear that you are attacking the article. For if such was the case why are you screeching about this article rather than taking the mohammadan supremacists at islamweb to task.
Are you capable of understanding that such intellectual dishonesty is why sites and articles such as this exist? Is it within your limited cognitive reasoning to grasp that this is why islam and mohammadans are hated?
It has nothing to do with “Jew-owned media” or “faux news” or “racist, cracker, redneck kkk uneducated bigots.” It has everything to do with mohammadan supremacists like you acting like intellectually stunted children when the embarrassing facts of your egregiously despicable cult are reported on rather than taking to task your fellow cult members who are engaging in said behavior while citing the dogma of your cult.
I do not hold any hope that you are wise or moral enough to understand or accept that and change your behavior and let your wrath loose upon your co-cultists rather than upon their victims.
trouble is that is exactly what islam is all about. avoiding this reality will not make it go away
No PC here, he tells it like it is!
A few days ago, the leader of a small political party in England was arrested after speaking on the steps of Guildhall in Winchester. Paul Weston is chairman of Liberty-GB. To see his picture, you would think he is a lawyer or a doctor or a CPA or even a local pastor.
However, Paul Weston must be a rabble-rouser, at the least, or an anarchist, at worst, who advocates the overthrow of the British government. Otherwise, why would the authorities arrest him for his public speech?
He may be a rabble-rouser, but he’s not an anarchist.
The public comments that caused Weston’s arrest on “suspicion of racial harassment,” were much more incendiary than the toppling of the government or the overthrow of the monarchy. Weston was critical of Islam.
On top of that, it wasn’t even Weston’s words which were critical of the world’s most protected and coddled religion and to which the authorities objected. They were the words of none other than Great Britain’s revered favorite son: Sir Winston Churchill.
Mr. Weston read a passage from a book by Churchill entitled The River War. A young Churchill wrote the book around 1899 based on his experiences as a British Army officer during the Mahdist War in the Sudan.
I have long been an admirer of Winston Churchill and have quoted him often on The Hal Lindsey Report. I have also been critical of Mr. Churchill’s complicity in the naive drawing of the borders of the nations of the modern Middle East. Despite those criticisms, however, I have always acknowledged that few men in history had a way of grasping a situation and its implications as thoroughly as Winston Churchill.
That’s why it’s worth noting when Winston Churchill describes Islam by saying, “The influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”
And those are just some of the words that landed Paul Weston in jail.
I think it’s eerily ironic that the two practices you cannot criticize without risking your livelihood, your social standing, or even your life are Islam and homosexuality. But what’s even more bizarre is that if you’re Muslim and live in a society governed by Sharia law, it’s acceptable to not only criticize homosexuality, but execute homosexuals.
And though the Gay movement doesn’t hesitate to publicly crucify – even destroy – anyone who doesn’t “approve” of their agenda, they’re strangely silent when it comes to criticizing Islam for its beliefs and practices.
That’s part of the problem they’re facing over the Beverly Hills Hotel. A company owned by the Sultan of Brunei now owns the famous hotel, home of the even more famous Polo Lounge, long a gathering place of Hollywood’s A-list.
Brunei is a tiny, oil rich country in Southeast Asia. And what the country owns belongs to the Sultan. That’s why he’s one of the world’s richest people.
That’s not the problem, though. His wealth and mind-blowing extravagance (he has 7,000 cars and, probably, his very own parking garage!) alone would make him a really popular guy in Hollywood. But the rub comes when his nation, Brunei, acted in accordance with its Islamic roots and recently instituted laws that include death by stoning for homosexuals and adulterers.
Now, it’s understandable that that news would shake up a lot of folks in Hollywood. If someone stoned all the homosexuals and adulterers there, the place would probably be buried in rocks. Of course, the media is once again focusing on the disapproving celebrities and not on the real story — these shocking laws are just another example of what happens when Islam rules.
And, if Paul Weston’s story is any indication, it may not be long before Islam rules in Great Britain. It’s already secured more than a foothold in other European nations where the Islamic population is growing nine times faster than the non-Islamic population. And, as I shared with you a few weeks ago, Muslims are demanding that they be allowed to live their lives according to Sharia law, not the law of the host nation.
And some Europeans want to capitulate and allow them to do so. But, be warned, that won’t satisfy them. They will demand more and more until, finally, they will demand that the entire nation be governed by Sharia law.
In Nigeria, in an effort to appease radical Muslim groups, the government allowed the northern part of the nation to be subject to Sharia. But that’s not enough to satisfy some Nigerian Muslims. They want the entire nation to submit.
That desire gave birth to a group loosely called Boko Haram. That westernized name is best translated, “Non-Muslim education is forbidden.” However, the formal name of the group includes (in various translations) the words “jihad” or “Holy War.” So you get the idea.
In the last few years, Boko Haram has grown increasingly radical and aggressive. Last month, they raided a girls’ school and kidnapped 276 young women. They were whisked away into a forbidding jungle larger than the state of Indiana.
Boko Haram’s leader has announced that he plans to sell the girls as slaves or child brides, for as little as $12 each. In fact, he insists that he’s acting in accordance with the teachings and traditions of Islam, and on the direction of Allah. And it’s difficult for so-called “moderate” Muslim groups around the world to denounce him because they have to acknowledge that he is, indeed, Koranically-correct.
What makes this heinous crime even more despicable is that no serious observer believes Boko Haram is bluffing. In February, they raided a Christian boys’ school and slaughtered 50 boys. The Muslim jihadists shot some of them in their beds, slit others’ throats, hacked them to death, or locked them in their dorms and burned them alive. Simply because they were Christians and being educated as such.
Some analysts say that Boko Haram has killed more than 10,000 people.
Almost no media reported when the boys were killed. Hundreds of Christians have been slaughtered and their churches burned while the mainstream media and the American government yawned. In fact, the media and the administration ignored the kidnapping of the girls until a frantic social media campaign, mostly on Twitter, shamed them into action.
Why?
Why did former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton refuse to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist group, although now she feigns disgust at their actions? I think it’s because President Obama, Hillary Clinton, and a host of other world leaders, past and present, made a strategic choice to get along with Muslim terrorists by giving in to them. Appeasement became the mantra of the day.
Winston Churchill must be spinning in his grave.
I know beyond doubt that, if he were alive today (and based on his life’s example), he would remind us that if we don’t recognize the nature of the enemy and the struggle we’re in, we’ll lose before we even start to resist. As he warned his fellow Britons almost 75 years ago, we must understand WHO and WHAT we’re fighting if we have any hope of winning.
Even former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recognizes this mistake. In an interview on CNN, he said: “The Bush administration didn’t do a good job…. you can’t win a battle of ideas unless you describe the enemy, say who it is, say what’s wrong with it, say what we do and why it”s right. We did that in the Cold War and we defeated Communism. We were tongue-tied over this and the Obama administration is much worse, they won’t even use the word.”
You probably know some “moderate” Muslims. That’s okay. I do, too. They are usually very sweet and courteous. In fact, in The River War, Churchill also wrote that some “individual Moslems may show splendid qualities.” But the fact is, “moderate Muslims” are not “good Muslims.” To the extent that Muslims are moderate, they are not following the literal Koran and the Hadith.
Once again, the media is telling the story in a way that actually protects the source of the problem, and that is Islam itself. Somehow in our politically-correct, multicultural society, we’ve come to confuse “All men are created equal” with the notion that “all ideas are equal.” They are not. Some ideas are just bad. And Islam is a bad idea.
Don’t miss this week’s Report on TBN, Daystar, CPM Network, The Word Network, various local stations, http://www.hallindsey.com or http://www.hischannel.com. Check your local listings.
God Bless,
Hal Lindsey
mail: HLMM, P.O. Box 470470, Tulsa, OK 74147
email: [email protected]
web: http://www.hallindsey.com
It’s quite heartening to see that this idiot is getting his comeuppance on the Daily Beast page. Looks like few there are buying his bullcrap.
Keep up the great work, as always, BNI!
NO AMERICANS AND NO OTHER INFIDELS SHOULD BE FORCED TO FINANCE PLO/PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY MUSLIM TERRORIST ORGANIZATION!
Barbaric, SATANIC MUSLIM KILLER MONSTERS of Jewish infidels are ADORED and REWARDED!
http://www.notaxesforterror.com/
Sign the petition against U.S. funding of the Palestinian terrorism industry!
We, the undersigned, are deeply disturbed that the Palestinian Authority (the West Bank government) uses U.S. tax dollars to pay terrorists and encourage future terrorists. According to new research, the Palestinian Authority (PA) pays salaries to convicted terrorists, using a sliding scale: the more horrific the crime, the higher the wages. Mass murderers receive the highest salaries.
This monthly payment is not for prisoners’ jail needs—which Israel covers in full—but operates as a high paying job, providing an incentive to terrorism. This industry is one of the PA’s top budgetary priorities. The U.S., as the largest single country donor to the PA, funds this morally reprehensible terrorism rewards program.
The terrorism industry is a major obstacle to peace. Why would the Palestinian people support peace if they have powerful incentives to murder Israelis?
The U.S. Congress has already passed legislation demanding more oversight on how American aid to the PA is spent, but no major changes have been made. We urge Congress to condition future Palestinian aid on the immediate cessation of the Palestinian terrorism industry, demand complete transparency on use of donor funds, and demand that the Palestinian governmental institutions supporting terrorism be shut down.
http://www.notaxesforterror.com/
“Hitting of the neck !” …. with a dull pocket knife …. sounds so much nicer …. than slitting their throats …. thanks, Allah ! Monedas 1929 Comedy Jihad Hitting Of The Clit With A Rusty Razor Blade World Tour
Even if he calls himself a muslim,I’ll bet he wouldn’t go before that bearded savage and tell him to his face that he is “distorting” islam,or else he’d find himself headless.Funny how all these people who say it does not represent true islam do so from a “free”country……all sub human camel farmers,not yet accepted that the earth isn’t flat.
Perhaps the funny man should go there and inform them of their mistake.
Great idea, Ray.
I’d chip in for his airfare, wouldn’t you?
Yes.
3rd rate?! Huh! He gets NO rate, it’s total failure.
Danish state television let’s the fascist Left taste their own medicine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNv3bdJ00Yc
(Must see!)
Pensions, please don’t post videos unless there are English subtitles.
Ah, okej, but theres no need to understand what they say. But i should’ve explained the video better.
The girl who gets whistled out from the headquarters of Danish state TV, had started a campaign on Facebook, for people to show up a politicians square speech, and whistle so loud that no one could hear the speech.
When she steppes in, the journalist ask the left wing girl why here campaign is such a good idea, and when she starts to speak, the journalist starts blowing her whistle.
😀 Haha!
But maybe its more funny if you are from Scandinavia, cause this happens all the time to non leftist politicians here, especially if they are against the population exchange and nazi muslims.
Leftist gather with whistles, vuvuzelas, drums and shout so much that no one can here them, and the police don’t dare to do anything cause they have enough time with trying to keep the leftist/arabs from attacking the speakers.
Thanks for the explanation.
A few thoughts at large.
I am not a psychiatrist, but I have a very keen interest in this medical discipline.
My only connection to psychiatry is my dear old ma was a psych nurse and I have worked in a major psychiatric hospital.
Thanks to my mother’s tales of her experiences and things I have seen and heard first hand, I think I can offer a very limited layman’s opinion on one of, if not THE key symptom(s) of true insanity.
My mother used to say that if you are ever accused of being extremely mentally ill to the point of certifiable insanity, IF YOU AGREE WITH THOSE MAKING THAT CLAIM, OR DIAGNOSIS, then you can not truly be insane.
If, on the other hand you DENY AND ARGUE THE FACT THAT YOU ARE INSANE, or if you don’t respond in any way, then chances are “you are crazier than a bed bug”.
Now I’m not saying that this is an EXACT way to diagnose a psychotic lunatic, but it’s not a bad barometer.
And surely most know that the psychiatric profession is anything but exact.
It’s probably the most “in flux” medical discipline there is.
My point?
The idiots that Bonni posts on this website who constantly DENY the fact that all these violent, vicious antics do not reflect true islam are a classic example of this theory.
Their constant rationalization of the actions of muslims, the denial that it is true islam, always making excuses and hiding or twisting the facts, in a way, make them text book lunatics.
This Dean Obiedallah, the assholes on BBC, CBC, MSNBC, CNN…all of them IN DENIAL!
Crazier than shit house rats!!
Now, the other side of this psychiatric coin is trying to define where the followers of
true islam fit on this line of reasoning.
Let’s face it, any group who can do the hideous things that muslims do in the name of their koran, must truly be INSANE.
How can they be anything else?
Those who practice these horrible acts, would also DENY that they are crazy, using the koran as their textbook and rationalizing that it is God’s direct order for them to do these things!
Remember, IF YOU DENY YOU ARE NUTS, YOU PROBABLY ARE NUTS!!!
So there you have it.
Two groups sitting next to each other on the tightrope of insanity, one doing the dirty work, the other trying to rationalize their every dirty deed!
I can’t believe some of the shit I hear on the MSM.
It’s getting to the point where it’s hard to determine which group are more crazy.
I really need my bourbon NOW!
Cheers, Amboy!
He needs to tell that to Boko Haram in person. They claim to be doing the work of their god. At least they are following the guidelines of the koran.
BOKO HARAM means “Non-Moslem teaching is forbidden”, or the local Hausa language to mean “Western education is a sin”. Ḥarām (Arabic: حَرَام ḥarām) is an Arabic term meaning sinful or forbidden. It’s antonym is halal (sounds familiar yet?)
Here’s a video (May 16, 2014) excerpt from Christian news analyst Hal Lindsey about Boko Haram (the video talks about other stuff e.g. Putin, Obama, etc. too) ~ http://youtu.be/m23sW7vxPjo
This terrorist Boko Haram group leader mocked western leaders including Pres. Barack Obama. Ironic isn’t it because BHO finances Al-Qaeda terrorist group. Guess he didn’t realize he was just a puppet simply used to gain money and arms to these devious Muslim terror groups!
Many chapters of Sharia law manuals concern the rules for slaves. Islam ENTIRELY approves of slavery…until the end of time.
Obeidallah presents his opinions about Sharia law as FACT. He invents his own facts. We call that BS.