NEW JERSEY: Arrogant Muslim baghead cries ‘victim’ when told by a mall security guard to take the mask off her face
Posted: May 22, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 23 Comments »
Wakeelah Salaam was shopping at the Bridegwater Commons Mall when a security guard came up to her and ordered her to remove her oppressed Muslim woman face covering. ”He said, ‘ma’am, I’m telling you, you cannot wear that mask in here. Litigation jihadists from CAIR preparing to file a lawsuit as we speak.
ABC He came as close to me as though he was going to kiss me, and then he made the hand gesture like he was going to lift it up for me,” Salaam said. (Kiss YOU? Don’t dream, honey)
Salaam was born in the United States, and was raised Muslim. Salaam says she was shocked when she was approached twice by the same mall security guard Saturday. She eventually felt so uncomfortable that she called police. ”I felt threatened, like I couldn’t walk and shop in the mall without this man asking me to take off my niqab,” Salaam added.
Like good little dhimmis, Bridgewater Commons’ security called Salaam to say, ”We sincerely apologize”, said Donald Lantz, “Our security guard has received additional training in cultural diversity how not to be offensive to muslims.
PENNSYLVANIA: CAIR gets anti-Foreign (sharia) Law legislation stalled in Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee.
Posted: May 22, 2012 Filed under: CAIR Nazis, Islam in America 6 Comments »HB 2029 which would ban the application of sharia law, has not moved for six months since terror-linked CAIR Philadelphia opposed it.
If there is any state legislature in America that should understand the need to spell out to judges that Sharia law should not be given any weight in their courts it is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The state’s judiciary came under national criticism in February 2012 when Pennsylvania Judge Mark Martin ruled that it was ok for a Muslim immigrant to allegedly chokehold an American citizen because the Muslim was allegedly unaware that Sharia law did not apply in Pennsylvania. Judge Martin essentially injected Sharia law as a defense.
HB 2029 entitled Amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, prohibiting the application of foreign law which would impair constitutional rights was introduced to the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on November 18, 2011.
The following forty three (43) Pennsylvania Representatives introduced HB 2029: Representative Swanger, Metcalfe, Perry, Baker, Benninghoff, Clymer, Cox, Creighton, Cutler, Denlinger, Dunbar, J. Evans, Gabler, Geist, Gingrich, Grove, Helm, Hennessy, Kauffman, F. Keller, Knowles, Maher, Metzgar, Millard, Miller, Moul, Murt, Mustio, Oberlander, Peifer, Pyle, Rapp, Roae, Saccone, Saylor, Schroder, Stern, Tallman, Toepel, Toohil, Truitt, Vereb and Youngblood.
The bill was referred to the House Judiciary committee on November 18, 2011, the same day it was introduced, where it has sat unmoved for six months.
CAIR Philadelphia (Council on American Islamic Relations) opposition to HB 2029 may explain why the bill has not moved. It appears CAIR Philadelphia was instrumental in influencing the Philadelphia City Council and Pittsburgh City Council to adopt resolutions aimed at opposing HB 2029.
Both resolutions use hyped up rhetoric to inflame emotions and fail to recognize what HB 2029 actually achieves.
HB 2029 mirrors the American Public Policy Alliance legislation titled American Laws for America Courts and is supported by the Center for Security Policy.
Florida Family Association has prepared an email for you to send urging the twenty-five members on the Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee to support and move HB 2029 prohibiting the application of foreign law which would impair constitutional rights.
To send your email, please click the following link, enter your name and email address then click the “Send Your Message” button. Because opponents try to use our email system to send opposing messages we NO longer allow for changes in the wording of the subject line or message of the email prepared for you to send.
Please click here to send your email to the Pennsylvania House Judiciary Committee.
KANSAS: Muslims demand Governor Sam Brownback veto anti-sharia bill that was passed by the State Legislature and Senate
Posted: May 19, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 28 Comments »
Hamas-linked CAIR and about 25 Muslims attended a rally Friday at the Statehouse urging Kansas Governor Sam Brownback to veto a bill banning foreign (anti-sharia) laws that they say actually is an attack on Islam.
CONTACT GOV. BROWNBACK’S OFFICE HERE
CJ ONLINE Faizan Syed, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ St. Louis branch, said similar “American Laws for American Courts” proposals have been floated in almost half of the 50 states this year. He said proponents have made them purposely vague to avoid running afoul of the Constitution like a 2010 Oklahoma law that specifically targeted Islamic law, or sharia. “We know this was targeted against Islam because of the Oklahoma law that was struck down,” Syed said. “They just changed the wording.”
The Kansas bill, House Substitute for Senate Bill 79, voids any state court decision that is based on a foreign or religious law that doesn’t comport with the state or U.S. Constitution. It passed the House 120-0 on May 7 and passed the Senate 33-3 on what was scheduled to be the last day of the session.
Some proponents have said it has nothing to do with Islam, but is merely meant to provide an extra layer of protection for Kansans’ constitutional rights. But from the beginning, a perceived threat of sharia creeping into Kansas communities has shadowed the debate.
When it first came to the House floor, Rep. Jan Pauls, D-Hutchinson, urged her colleagues to vote for it by saying it was critically important to address sharia. Rep. Peggy Mast, R-Emporia, who lobbied heavily to ensure the bill got a vote in the Senate, also has pointed to sharia as a growing threat.
When the bill came to the Senate floor, Sen. Susan Wagle, R-Wichita, called it a women’s rights issue, noting “they stone women to death in countries that have sharia law.”
“That’s not sharia law,” (Yes, it is) Omar Hazim, imam of the Islamic Center of Topeka, said after Friday’s rally. “People need to try to gain some knowledge before they make decisions that are going to affect a lot of people.”
Hazim, who said his organization has 250 to 300 members, spoke at Friday’s rally. He said that sharia refers to much more than a set of laws in Islam. Rather, he said it is a code of living that includes prayer, fasting, charitable giving, pilgrimage and service. (As well as stoning women, hanging homosexuals, executing blasphemers, cutting limbs off thieves, punishing victims of rape but not rapists, etc., etc.)
Hazim said the Koran states sharia shouldn’t be forced on anyone. (That’s why you burn churches and forcibly convert or kill non-Muslims in Muslim-majority countries who refuse to convert to Islam) He also said he was disappointed that neither he nor Washburn University law professor Liaquat Ali Khan were invited to speak to legislators about the bill.(The only thing you should be invited to do is leave the country, permanently)
Syed said women in America are already protected by the Constitution. (But Muslim women won’t be if sharia is imposed in their communities)
“It’s not about Muslim women,” he said. “That’s just an excuse they use to really push this Islamophobic agenda.”(Hey, whatever works) When asked why Friday’s rally included only a few women, Syed said he wasn’t sure. ”Probably they had to work or something,” he said.
One woman who was there was Sharo Hancock, the Kansas City community coordinator of the Asian-American Democratic Caucus. Hancock said as a “white, non-Islamic citizen” she was disturbed by the bill. ”Any legislation that violates freedom of speech, I have a huge problem with,” she said. “This isn’t just an issue for Muslims, this is an issue for all Americans.” (It’s Americans we care about, NOT muslims)
RELATED STORY:
hooray-kansas-lawmakers-pass-anti-sharia-legislation-muslims-are-sulking
THE NEXT FIGHT AGAINST SHARIA IS MISSOURI
Three Muslims (one who employed a 9/11 hijacker) indicted on charges of $17.5 million money laundering scam and tax fraud
Posted: May 18, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 8 Comments »Two local Muslim businessmen were named in a federal indictment unsealed Tuesday accusing them of conspiring to profit from fraudulent tax refund checks. One of the men, Osama “Sam” Mahmud Mustafa, previously owned a gas station in San Diego, where he briefly employed a man in 2000 who later would become one of the Sept. 11 hijackers.
2TBO (H/T Henry P) In connection with the tax fraud indictment, federal prosecutors are seeking the forfeiture of more than $26 million either obtained from or linked to the offenses.
In addition to Mustafa, who lives in Riverview, the indictment, handed up last week in Virginia, names Khaldoun “Tony” Khalil Khawaja, of Tampa, as well as Khawaja’s brother, Muawia “Mike” Khalil Abdeljalil, who lives in Virginia.
Khawaja was sentenced last month to three years in prison on a federal weapons charge. Abdeljalil was arrested in Tampa on tax fraud-related charges when he attended his brother’s sentencing hearing.
The three men are accused of involvement in a growing type of fraud in which street criminals use stolen personal information to file tax returns with bogus financial information used to get tax “refunds.”
The brothers own convenience stores — Khawaja in Tampa and Abdeljalil in Virginia.
Mustafa was arrested today as federal agents searched his Riverview home and his Tampa car businesses.
According to a federal indictment, the three men used their businesses to launder the proceeds of tax fraud. Authorities say they purchased fraudulent income tax return checks and checks issued for refund anticipation loans and then presented those fraudulent checks for payment at financial institutions in Virginia, Florida and elsewhere.
In total, the three are accused of fraudulently depositing more than $17.5 million.
Mustafa’s cousin, Willie Museitef, manages one of Mustafa’s businesses, BNA Automotive on Linebaugh Avenue said the tax fraud allegations were “absolutely shocking.”
Museitef said he was aware of his cousin’s name being mentioned in the 9/11 report. “What he was telling me is they think that one of the guys that was involved in that mess worked in the gas station,” Museitef said of Mustafa.
Museitef said his cousin was in no way linked to the attacks. “He didn’t even have any knowledge of it.” According to the 9/11 Commission report, Mustafa and the manager of the San Diego gas station station, Iyad Kreiwesh, “have both been the subject of FBI counterterrorism investigations.
Khawaja was recorded buying bogus U.S. Treasury checks from undercover detectives, according to evidence introduced in his weapons trial in January. On the recording, Khawaja can be seen paying $280, representing 20 percent of the face value, for a bogus Treasury check.
When investigators searched Khawaja’s store May 20, they found four Treasury checks in his front pocket, according to a federal court affidavit. He told agents he often negotiated Treasury checks and sent them to Abdeljalil in Roanoke, Va.
Agents obtained FedEx Express records of 36 packages sent by Khawaja to Abdeljalil between February and July 2010. In addition, agents analyzed 399 of the checks worth almost $1.7 million deposited into Abdeljalil’s accounts.
Riedel told a judge last month that Khawaja is in this country illegally from Jordan. And Abdeljalil is accused in a separate indictment of entering into two fraudulent marriages in an effort to remain in the U.S. The arrest affidavit says Abdeljalil’s real wife, the mother of his children, married a gay sex offender in an attempt to stay in the U.S.
Mustafa said that his family lived in Ramallah, a Palestinian city on the West Bank.
Soooooie! Like a pig in heat, the same Muslim asslifter is bellowing the highly offensive Islamic Call to Prayer in new locations now
Posted: May 17, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 70 Comments »Hopefully he got kicked out of the Woodbury Common Mall. Now he shows up at a local Fair and a Walmart. I am so waiting for somebody to come up and knock the crap out of this 7th Century throwback. There are laws against disturbing the peace in this country.
NEIGHBORHOOD FAIR
WALMART PARKING LOT
H/T HalalPorkShop
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
another-reason-why-most-everyone-hates-muslims-warning-cover-your-dogs-ears
the-muslim-call-to-prayer-is-one-of-the-prettiest-sounds-on-earth-barack-hussein-obama
PENNSYLVANIA: Pastor wants removal of textbook that promotes Islam over Christianity and Judaism, and denigrates Christians
Posted: May 17, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 29 Comments »
This is what happens when you allow the Saudis to fund textbooks used in American classrooms. Norwin, PA school administrators are defending a middle school social studies textbook that a local pastor called “an Islamic Trojan horse” in requesting that the district revise its curriculum involving the religion.
Trib Live In an administrative report this week, Superintendent William Kerr said the textbook is “an acceptable reference for the seventh-grade global studies course of study.”
The book, “myWorld History: Early Ages,” is one of several used in seventh-grade social studies “to teach comparative religions in a nondevotional, instructional manner,” according to the district.
In March, The Rev. Bruce Leonatti of Zion Lutheran Church in Circleville told the school board that the book “promotes Islam over Christianity and Judaism” and “denigrates Christians.”Leonatti said he plans to present a second report to the district about two textbooks under consideration for purchase because he disagrees with how they describe the Muslim aspect of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
“This is not a done deal in terms of what we’re looking at,” Leonatti said. “We’re still exploring this. And they seem to kind of want to put it away and get rid of the whole issue, but it’s still there.”
Leonatti, who formerly taught history at Duquesne High School and in Ohio, contends the social studies text is riddled with errors. He said he’s involved with “ACT! For America,” whose mission is to “give Americans concerned about national security, terrorism, and the threat of radical Islam, a powerful, organized, informed and mobilized voice,” according to its website.
The book’s publisher, Pearson Education, “reaffirmed its commitment to a balanced and accurate coverage of world religions.” The “myWorld History” program is used in thousands of classrooms nationwide, a spokeswoman said. (U.S. Pusblishers get these Saudi funded textbooks either free or at a substantial discount which is why they push them on the schools)
Kerr states in the report that “there are no errors or misrepresentations in the textbook at issue which are significant enough to render it unusable as a curricular resource.”
OK, folks, decide for yourself:
Sample passages taken from “myWorld History: Early Ages” that The Rev. Bruce Leonatti objects to:
• “Religious toleration also helped the Arab Muslim Empire expand.”
• “The Arab Muslim empire was generally tolerant towards Jews and Christians.”
• “As the Arab Muslims build their empire, Islam spread peacefully both inside the empire and to the lands beyond its borders.”
• “Mobs of Christian peasants turned on those Jews who would not convert to Christianity.”
• “Medieval Christians would not tolerate even minor differences in beliefs.”
“I believe the board has been very supportive of our teachers and administrators and concur that the administrative report brings closure to this topic,” Kerr said.
“Norwin isn’t going to have any curriculum or textbook that’s going to be harmful to students,” Kerr said. “We are here in this case to teach about cultures. Part of culture is religion and tradition. We have made every effort to teach comparative religion in a nonbiased, nondevotional way.”
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
must-see-for-parents-if-you-have-children-in-american-schools
have-your-schools-been-indoctrinated-with-whitewashed-islamic-propaganda-yet
washington-parents-raise-hell-over-cair-request-to-teach-islam-in-public-schools
education-jihad-comes-to-america-via-turkish-gulen-charter-schools-funded-by-you
massachusetts-school-submits-to-islam-closes-down-for-muslim-religious-holiday-of-eid
california-public-school-preaching-islam-in-the-classroom-aclu-nowhere-to-be-found
georgia-publisher-of-pro-islamic-text-book-claims-to-be-getting-many-online-threats
florida-department-of-education-is-promoting-islamic-propaganda-in-public-school-classrooms
terrorist-front-group-cair-trying-to-push-the-teaching-of-islam-into-your-public-schools
georgia-middle-school-furious-parent-gets-sharia-friendly-curriculum-scrapped
bni-readers-this-came-from-a-woman-in-ohio-who-is-trying-to-fight-the-islamization-of-schools-there
a-citizen’s-guide-to-islamist-curricula-in-our-public-schools
unbelievable-terrorist-sympathizers-of-the-aclu-finally-are-doing-something-that-isnt-anti-american
california-another-school-system-is-exposed-for-using-history-textbooks-that-sanitize-islam
temecula-ca-group-hands-out-fliers-to-students-accusing-teachers-of-lying-about-islam
An Encyclopedic Antidote to Islamic Indoctrination in Public Schools
north-carolina-parents-outraged-over-use-of-islamic-quran-in-public-school-classroom
texas-school-district-will-force-students-to-study-arabic-language-and-culture
parents-please-read-your-childrens-textbooks
oh-my-god-is-your-school-allowing-this-kind-of-islamic-indoctrination-of-your-children
hidden-agenda-behind-nyc-muslims-demand-for-two-islamic-school-holidays
help-stop-the-islamization-of-new-york-city-schools
has-radical-islam-infiltrated-your-childs-school-yet
the-islamic-indoctrination-of-your-childrens-schools-continues
look-what-liberals-are-teaching-your-kids-about-islam
california-7th-graders-to-be-taught-an-erroneous-sanitized-version-of-islamic-sharia-rule
here-it-comes-public-school-to-close-for-2-muslim-holidays
saudi-funded-campus-jihad-at-american-universities
san-diego-school-oks-muslim-prayer
new-york-high-school-exam-slams-christianity-praises-islam
california-activists-protest-sanitized-version-of-the-religion-of-hate-in-public-schools
mentioning-jesus-is-forbidden-in-public-schools-but-forcing-your-kids-to-pray-to-allah-is-not
new-jersey-schools-sumit-to-islam-approve-school-closings-for-2-muslim-holy-days
USA Defence League condemns ’60 Minutes’ fluff piece on the most dangerous Islamist in America – Fetullah Gulen
Posted: May 16, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 31 Comments »
Condemnation of Imam Fetullah Gulen
May 14, 2012
The United States of America Defence League (USADL) Leadership Council hereby condemns CBS News, 60 Minutes, Lesley Stahl and Imam Gulen for spreading lies about the Islamic indoctrination centers labeled ‘charter schools’. Imam Gulen and the Gulenists in America have, with the assistance of CBS, 60 Minutes, Lesley Stahl and various politicians have:
* Violated the equal protection provisions of the Constitution.
* Continue to advance the indoctrination of America’s children into submission to Islam.
* Refuse to hire Americans, during a time of high unemployment, while forcing taxpayers to fund H1B visas and advanced degrees for non citizens, all the while taking tax dollars to operate their indoctrination centers.
The political bipartisanship that has resulted in Islamic funded trips to Turkey, for American politicians, solely for the advancement of Sharia in America, is a direct violation of their Constitutional oath office. Particularly while endorsing an Imam that said: “You must move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers … until the conditions are ripe, they [the followers] must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads”. See complete article:
http://usadefenceleague.com/2012/05/imam-gulen-his-war-on-americas-children/
All requests for interview should go through the media request form on the USADL website (www.usadefenceleague.com) in order to better facilitate a proper response. Thank you.
Bill Turner – National Director, USADL
SEE RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS ON GULEN HERE:
media-alert-60-minutes-cbs-7pm-eastern-time-tonight
education-jihad-comes-to-america-via-turkish-gulen-charter-schools-funded-by-you
the-most-dangerous-islamist-in-the-world-has-been-lauded-by-bill-and-hillary-clinton
MAYO CLINIC fires Female Genital Mutilation-supporting Muslim pediatrician
Posted: May 16, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 60 Comments »
Dr. Elhagaly is no longer employed or caring for patients at Mayo Clinic Health System in Albert Lea. We are working with his patients to transition their care to another physician. Female circumcision in children, referred to as female genital mutilation in U.S. legal statutes, is a felony-level child abuse crime. Mayo Clinic strongly opposes the procedure and it has never been performed at any Mayo Clinic facility.
CHANGE (H/T Don L) Hatem Elhagaly (AKA “Hatem Al Haj”) worked as a doctor in Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine at the Mayo Clinic in Albert Lea, MN. His special interests are in child development.
He is also a proponent of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
In an Arabic-language paper entitled “Circumcision of Girls: Jurisprudence and Medicine” (original here and here), Elhagaly (AKA “Al Haj”) repeatedly points to the idea that FGM is “an honor” for women, ignoring FGM’s extremely detrimental effects on women’s health and the barbarity of the practice. He attempts to justify his ideas by referencing scholars from several schools of Islamic thought and also the words of Muhammad, including the idea that FGM is desirable “because it is more beautiful to behold and better for her husband.”
Hatem Elhagaly was taking care of young girls in Albert Lea, MN. We cannot entrust our children’s medical care to a man who supports horrific, brutal, and illegal mutilatory practices.
Learn more about him at his website where he says, “Some websites known for their Islamophobia have been waging a campaign against me because of statements I made regarding female circumcision, known as female genital cutting, (and many unjustifiably insist on calling all of its forms, female genital mutilation.”
Hatem Elhagaly is already gone from his job at the Mayo Clinic. I now demand that the various medical boards that support him revoke his certifications.
SIGN THE PETITION TO REVOKE HIS CERTIFICATIONS HERE
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
Short Bio
Dr. Hatem al-Haj
www.drhatemalhaj.com
Personal
D.O.B.: 9/6/1388 AH. 09/02/1968 AD. Born in Cairo, Egypt
Currently, resides in the United States of America
Married and has four children
Degrees
Islamic
PhD in Comparative Fiqh from al-Jinan University, Tripoli, Lebanon, Grade: summa cum laude (excellent).
Master’s Degree in Islamic law (Sharee’a) from the American Open University, Grade: summa cum laude (excellent).
Medical
Board Certification in Pediatrics by the American Board of Pediatrics.
M.B., CH.B. (Equivalent to MD) Graduated with Honors from Alexandria University Medical School, Alexandria, Egypt
Jobs
Currently, Dean of College of Islamic Studies – Mishkah University.
Currently, Part-Time Pediatrician.
1991-1994 Imam, Masjid al-Birr, Astoria, NY, NY.
Memberships
The Building Blocks of Islam, President of the BOT.
Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America (AMJA), Member of the Permanent Fatwa Committee
North American Imam Federation (NAIF), Member
American Academy of Pediatrics, Fellow
AGAIN! Filthy Muslim videotaped bellowing the Islamic Call to Prayer at the Woodbury Common outlet mall in Harriman, NY
Posted: May 16, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 71 Comments »This time security comes over, but who do they confront? NOT the Muslim, but the person who was videotaping the shrieking spectacle of Islamic supremacism in action. The cameraman was warned not to take videos in the mall. The Muslim finally leaves, but not because he was told to by security.
H/T HalalPorkShop
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
another-reason-why-most-everyone-hates-muslims-warning-cover-your-dogs-ears
the-muslim-call-to-prayer-is-one-of-the-prettiest-sounds-on-earth-barack-hussein-obama
“Yes, we ARE at war with Islam,” say 73% of American voters
Posted: May 16, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America, ISLAMOBAMA 29 Comments »
In other words, most American voters disagree with Barack Hussein Obama who said, “We are not—and never will be—at war with Islam. It was not a religion that attacked us that September day. It was al-Qaeda.”
WND Rasmussen Reports found that 73% of mainstream U.S. voters believe there is a conflict in the world between Western civilization and Islamic nations, and a plurality (49%) believe most of the world’s Muslims view America as an enemy. The numbers became even more significant when separating mainstream U.S. voters from a group Rasmussen calls the “political class.” Only half of Rasmussen’s “political class” acknowledges a global conflict, and 62 percent reject the idea that Muslims view the U.S. as an enemy.
A series of polls released over the last few weeks shows most Americans believe a global conflict is raging between Islam and the West.
Specifically, Rasmussen Reports polls found that 63 percent of likely U.S. voters believe a battle is brewing, while only 18 percent deny the divide.
Furthermore, when asked about many Western nations’ support of the populist uprisings known as “the Arab Spring,” only 26 percent of voters think the United States should do more to encourage the growth of democracy in the Islamic world, while 58 percent say the United States should leave things alone.
Similarly, 61 percent of mainstream voters suspect a terrorist attack in the U.S. in the next year is likely, while 70 percent of the political class see little or no chance of such an attack.
Rasmussen found that taken as a whole, however, only 11 percent of likely U.S. voters think the war on terror is over, while 79 percent say that war, declared after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on America, is still ongoing.
Rasmussen explains it defines “political class” as the subset of Americans whose answers to poll questions reveal they look primarily to governing elite – rather than the American people – to best rule the nation.
The “political class,” therefore, isn’t actually composed of D.C. and Wall Street insiders, but Rasmussen explains, “Experience has shown that political class voters share the views and attitudes of the elites they support. … In many cases, the gap between the mainstream view and the political class is larger than the gap between mainstream Republicans and Democrats.”
On the issue of international Islamic relations, Rasmussen found 80 percent of Republicans and 62 percent of unaffiliated believe there is a global conflict today between Western civilization and the Islamic world. Just 46 percent of Democrats agreed.
There’s little partisan disagreement, however, when it comes to what the United States should do about it, Rasmussen found: Majorities of all three groups say America should stop fueling the Arab Spring that has already toppled several more secular governments in the Muslim world.
WISCONSIN: After massive community opposition, Brookfield mega-mosque gets go-ahead by dhimmi politicians
Posted: May 16, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 52 Comments »Brookfield aldermen approved plans for a nearly 13,000-square-foot mosque (to be expanded to 22,000 sq. ft), to the joy of Waukesha County Muslims and the chagrin of opponents who sought to table the project.
Brookfield Patch The Common Council voted 14-0 Tuesday to grant a conditional use permit, with aldermen assuring residents the city had “thoroughly vetted” traffic and other site issues before green-lighting construction. ”We’re elated,” said Mushir Hassan, a Muslim resident and project leader for the mosque.
Mayor Steve Ponto, who voted in favor of the mosque last week as head of the city’s Plan Commission, said Tuesday he believed the city had been transparent and open with its mosque review. “I know that it’s a sensitive matter for many residents,” Ponto told Patch but added: “I really am confident that we will not have any problems.” (You know what happens when you assume)
Residents urged rejection or tabling of the mosque plans, citing concerns ranging from traffic and future expansion to terrorism and use of Sharia or Islamic law to subvert U.S. laws.
Charles Cook of Hartland asked aldermen to write conditions into the development agreement barring Muslims from exercising Sharia law over city rules and regulations. Cook turned to face the audience. ”I just want to say thank you for you Muslim people, for coming out and trying to build this mosque. This has helped the Christians to get out of the churches and take back America,” Cook said.
A much smaller crowd attended the Brookfield Common Council meeting Tuesday than the overflow crowd of mosque opponents at last week's public hearing. Aldermen gave the project final approvals.
Residents criticize ‘veiled threat’ by Muslims
Some residents said they didn’t appreciate the “veiled threat” that a Muslim leader gave city plan commissioners at a packed public hearing last week when he said federal government civil rights officials investigate denials of mosques.
Brookfield resident Beverly Kuntzsch told aldermen she was concerned about public safety. She said the New York Police Department surveyed 100 mosques nationwide in 2007 and found substantial ties to terrorism and “Jihad.”
“How will you monitor the literature or the preaching / teaching of violence that’s going on in the mosques?” Kuntzsch asked. Dan Bregant, who lives on Calhoun Road, said he had a petition of opposition from residents across the city.
Traffic congestion will get an ‘F’
The city said that although the traffic “level of service” would worsen to an “F” when the mainly weekly Friday services are let out about 2 p.m.
Resident Ted Gibbs noted the Islamic Society originally asked to build a 22,000 sq. ft. mosque and still has plans to expand to that size.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
wisconsin-walid-shoebat-ex-plo-terrorist-and-convert-to-christianity-draws-a-big-crowd
Latest Update on States’ Activities re: legislation to BAN SHARIA/International Law
Posted: May 16, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 23 Comments »Contact your state lawmakers and insist that they pass anti-sharia legislation. Don’t let them use the CAIR-devised excuse that banning sharia will make it difficult for companies to do business with Muslim countries. It’s a damn lie. If your lawmakers vote it down, or do nothing about it, throw them out and elect people who support anti-sharia bills.
Kansas is now in the blue column. Those states that tried but failed can try and try again, until they pass it.
May 7: Kansas’ House approves unanimously (120-0) SB 79 as amended by the House, a statute to ban the use of foreign or international law.
May 8: New Hampshire’s Senate Judiciary Committee recommended referring that state’s version (HB 1422) to an interim summer study.
May 9: Alabama’s Senate voted to indefinitely postpone and effective kill proposed constitutional amendment SB 84.
May 10: New Jersey’s AB 919, which the author had previously noted would be withdrawn, was formally removed from the legislature.
May 11: Kansas’ Senate approved SB 79 on a 33-3 vote. Proponents went out of their way during the debate to note the word “sharia” was not included in the bill, however news reports indicate that sharia was the focus of the bill when introduced and was specifically mentioned during debate.
Full roster of 41 bills introduced
| Bill | Provisions | Status |
| Alabama SB 33 (Constitutional Amendment) | Enacts American and Alabama Laws for Alabama Courts Amendment. Provides “A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, arbitrative, or enforcement authority shall not apply or enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate any state law or a right guaranteed by the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” | In Senate Committee on Judiciary. |
| Alabama SB 40 (Constitutional Amendment) | Defines foreign law as “any law, rule, or legal code, or system established, used, or applied in a jurisdiction outside of the states or territories of the United States, or which exist as a separate body of law, legal code, or system adopted or used anywhere by any people, group, or culture different from the Constitution and laws of the United States or the State of Alabama.” Provides “A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, arbitrative, or enforcement authority shall not apply or enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate any state law or a right guaranteed by the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” | In Senate Judiciary Committee. |
| Alabama SB 84 (Constitutional Amendment) | Defines foreign law as “any law, rule, or legal code, or system established, used, or applied in a jurisdiction outside of the states or territories of the United States, or which exist as a separate body of law, legal code, or system adopted or used anywhere by any people, group, or culture different from the Constitution and laws of the United States or the State of Alabama.” Provides “A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, arbitrative, or enforcement authority shall not apply or enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate any state law or a right guaranteed by the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” | Indefinitely postponed by full Senate 5/9/12. |
| Alaska HB 88 | Prohibits a court, arbitrator, mediator, administrative agency, or enforcement authority from applying a foreign law if application of the foreign law would violate an individual’s right guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Alaska or the United States Constitution. | Approved by House State Affairs Committee 3/17/11. Approved by House Judiciary Committee 4/4/11. Carried over from 2011 session. |
| Florida HB 1209 | Provides “foreign law, legal code, or system” means any law, legal code, or system of a jurisdiction outside any state or territory of the United States, including, but not limited to, international organizations or tribunals, and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies, or other formal or informal tribunals. Provides the term does not include the common law and statute laws of England as described or any laws of the Native American tribes in the state. Declares “Any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision violates the public policy of this state and is void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its ruling or decision in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any foreign law, legal code, or system that does not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges guaranteed by the State Constitution or the United States Constitution.” | Approved by House Judiciary Committee 2/22/12. Approved by full House 3/1/12. Died in Senate Judiciary Committee when legislature adjourned. |
| Florida SB 1360 | Provides “foreign law, legal code, or system” means any law, legal code, or system of a jurisdiction outside any state or territory of the United States, including, but not limited to, international organizations or tribunals, and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies, or other formal or informal tribunals. Provides the term does not include the common law and statute laws of England as described or any laws of the Native American tribes in the state. Declares “Any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision violates the public policy of this state and is void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its ruling or decision in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any foreign law, legal code, or system that does not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges guaranteed by the State Constitution or the United States Constitution.” | Approved by Senate Budget Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice Appropriations 2/28/12. Died on Senate floor when legislature adjourned. |
| Georgia HB 45 | Provides “the term ‘foreign law’ means any law, rule, or legal code or system established and used or applied in a jurisdiction outside of the United States or its territories…A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other tribunal shall not enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” | In House Committee on Judiciary. Carried over from 2011 session. Died in committee when legislature adjourned. |
| Georgia HB 242 | Declares “‘foreign law’ means any law, rule, or legal code or system established and used or applied in a jurisdiction outside of the United States or its territories…A court, administrative agency, or other tribunal shall not enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” | Approved by House Committee on Judiciary Non-Civil 2/24/12. Died on House floor when legislature adjourned. |
| Georgia SB 51 | Provides that no court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other tribunal shall enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the Constitution of this state or of the United States | In Senate Committee on the Judiciary. Carried over from 2011 session. Died in committee when legislature adjourned. |
| Georgia SR 926 (Constitutional Amendment) | Describes foreign and religious laws which are incompatible with the laws and policy of the United States and the State of Georgia. Provides ways in which incompatible laws may not be applied or enforced by courts of state. | In Senate Committee on Judiciary. Died in committee when legislature adjourned. |
| Indiana HB 1166 | Provides that a court may not apply, enforce, or grant comity, res judicata, claim preclusion, or issue preclusion to a foreign law, ruling, or judgment if doing so would violate the fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Constitution of the State of Indiana. Provides that a provision in a contract or agreement: (1) that provides for the choice of foreign laws in its interpretation; or (2) that provides for the choice of venue or forum; and that would result in a violation of a fundamental liberty, right, or privilege guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Constitution of the State of Indiana is void and unenforceable. Prohibits a court from granting certain motions if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. Provides that a court may not require or authorize any court to: (1) adjudicate or prohibit a religious organization from adjudicating ecclesiastical matters; or (2) determine or interpret the doctrine of a religious organization. | In House Committee on Judiciary. Probably dead; failed to advance to Senate before crossover day. |
| Indiana SB 36 | Prohibits the enforcement of a foreign law (defined as a law established and used outside the jurisdiction of the United States) if the enforcement would violate a right granted by the Indiana or United States Constitution. Provides that a provision in a contract or agreement calling for the application of foreign law is not enforceable and is void if the provision cannot be modified, unless the contract explicitly states that it will be enforced in accordance with foreign law. Prohibits a court from granting certain motions to transfer a case to another jurisdiction if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. | In Senate Committee on Judiciary. Probably dead; failed to advance to House before crossover day. |
| Indiana SB 90 | Prohibits the enforcement of a foreign law (defined as a law established and used outside the jurisdiction of the United States) if the enforcement would violate a right granted by the Indiana or United States Constitution. Provides that a provision in a contract or agreement between natural persons calling for the application of foreign law is not enforceable and is void if the provision cannot be modified. Prohibits a court from granting certain motions to transfer a case to another jurisdiction if the transfer is likely to affect the constitutional rights of the nonmoving party. | In Senate Committee on Judiciary. Probably dead; failed to advance to House before crossover day. |
| Iowa HB 489 | Defines “foreign law, legal code, or system” as “any law, legal code, or system of a jurisdiction outside of any state or territory of the United States, including but not limited to international organizations and tribunals, and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies, or other formal or informal tribunals.” Provides “It is the public policy of this state that the primary factor which a court, administrative agency, arbitrator, mediator, or other entity or person acting under the authority of state law shall consider in granting comity to a decision rendered under any foreign law, legal code, or system against a person in this state is whether the decision rendered violated any right of the person in this state guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Iowa, the Constitution of the United States, or any statute enacted or decision issued under the constitution of the state of Iowa or the United States.” | In House Judiciary Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. Probably dead; failed to advance to Senate before crossover day. |
| Iowa HB 575 | Enacts “Iowa Freedom and Sovereignty Act.” Defines “Foreign law” as “any law enacted by a jurisdiction or a governmental or quasi-governmental body other than the federal government or a state of the United States. “Foreign law” includes a religious law, legal code, accord, or ruling promulgated or made by an international organization, tribunal, or formal or informal administrative body.” Provides “any foreign law or other law that is in conflict with the principles of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, or the Constitution of the State of Iowa shall not have force or effect in this state…It is the public policy of this state that the only factor that a court, administrative agency, arbitrator, mediator, or other person acting under authority of this state’s laws shall consider in granting comity to a decision rendered under a foreign law that affects a sovereign citizen of this state is whether the decision violates the sovereign citizen’s rights under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Iowa.” | In House State Government Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. Probably dead; failed to advance to Senate before crossover day. |
| Iowa HJR 14 (Constitutional Amendment) | Provides the state courts “when exercising judicial power, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution of the State of Iowa, the United States Code, federal regulations, established common law, the Iowa Code, the Iowa administrative code, and if necessary the law of another state of the United States provided the law of the other state does not include Sharia law. The courts shall not use the legal precepts of other nations or cultures. Specifically, the courts shall not consider international law or Sharia law. The provisions of this section shall apply to all cases before the respective courts including but not limited to cases of first impression.” | In House Judiciary Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. Probably dead; failed to advance to Senate before crossover day. |
| Iowa SB 2198 | Enacts “Iowa Freedom and Sovereignty Act.” Defines “Foreign law” as “any law enacted by a jurisdiction or a governmental or quasi-governmental body other than the federal government or a state of the United States. “Foreign law” includes a religious law, legal code, accord, or ruling promulgated or made by an international organization, tribunal, or formal or informal administrative body.” Provides “any foreign law or other law that is in conflict with the principles of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, or the Constitution of the State of Iowa shall not have force or effect in this state…It is the public policy of this state that the only factor that a court, administrative agency, arbitrator, mediator, or other person acting under authority of this state’s laws shall consider in granting comity to a decision rendered under a foreign law that affects a sovereign citizen of this state is whether the decision violates the sovereign citizen’s rights under the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Iowa.” | In Senate State Government Committee. Probably dead; failed to advance to House before crossover day. |
| Kansas HB 2087 | Defines “foreign law,” “legal code” or “system” means any law, legal code or system of a jurisdiction outside of any state or territory of the United States, including, but not limited to, international organizations and tribunals and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies or other formal or informal tribunals. Provides “Any court, arbitration, tribunal or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any law, legal code or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights and privileges granted under the United States and Kansas constitutions.” | Approved by full House 3/30/11. In Senate Committee on Judiciary. Carried over from 2011 session. Replaced with unrelated amendment text 5/10/11. |
| Kansas SB 79 | ORIGINAL: Amends the state debt setoff law to provide that the collection assistance fee for all debts owed to a court shall be paid by the debtor as an additional cost, rather than deducted from the debts owed to a court. AS HOUSE AMENDED: Defines “foreign law,” “legal code” or “system” means any law, legal code or system of a jurisdiction outside of any state or territory of the United States, including, but not limited to, international organizations and tribunals and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies or other formal or informal tribunals. Provides “Any court, arbitration, tribunal or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any law, legal code or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights and privileges granted under the United States and Kansas constitutions.” | Approved by full House 5/7/12. Approved by full Senate 5/11/12. To Governor for approval. |
| Kentucky HB 386 | Establishes legislative intent that the rights of an individual afforded under the Constitutions of the Commonwealth and the United States take precedence over the application of any foreign law in any judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding. Strictly construe waivers of constitutional rights Provides exceptions for corporate entities Prohibits choice of venue outside of the Commonwealth or United States to preserve the constitutional rights of the person against whom enforcement is sought. | In House Judiciary Committee. Died in committee when legislature adjourned. |
| Michigan HB 4769 | Defines “foreign law,” as “any law, legal code, or system of a jurisdiction outside of any state or territory of the United States, including, but not limited to, international organizations and tribunals, and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies, or other formal or informal tribunals.” Provides “A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, mediation, or enforcement authority shall not enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the constitution of this state or of the United States.” | In House Committee on Judiciary. |
| Michigan SB 701 | Defines “foreign law,” as “any law, legal code, or system of a jurisdiction outside of any state or territory of the United States, including, but not limited to, international organizations and tribunals, and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies, or other formal or informal tribunals.” Provides “A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, mediation, or enforcement authority shall not enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the constitution of this state or of the United States.” | In Senate Committee on Government Operations. |
| Minnesota SB 2281 | Provides “A court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision violates the public policy of this state and is void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on a law, legal code, or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted under the Minnesota Constitution and the United States Constitution, including but not limited to due process, freedom of religion, speech, or press, and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the Minnesota Constitution.” | Withdrawn by author 3/5/12. |
| Mississippi HB 2 | Provides “”Foreign law” means any law, rule, or legal code or system established and used or applied in a jurisdiction outside of the states or territories of the United States…A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, mediation, or enforcement authority shall not enforce a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” | In House Judiciary A Committee. Dead; failed to advance out of committee before deadline. |
| Mississippi HB 698 | Prohibit use of international or Sharia law by state’s judiciary. | In House Judiciary A Committee. Dead; failed to advance out of committee before deadline. |
| Missouri HB 1512 | Provides court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any foreign law, legal code, or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted under the United States and Missouri constitutions, including, but not limited to, due process, freedom of religion, speech, or press, and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically defined by the constitution of this state. | Approved by full House 3/29/12. |
| Missouri SB 676 | Mandates that any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling shall be unenforceable if based on a foreign law that does not grant the parties the same rights as the parties have under the United States and Missouri constitutions. | Approved by Senate General Laws Committee 2/28/12. |
| Nebraska LB 647 | Declares a court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings on any foreign law, legal code, or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decisions the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Nebraska. | In Senate Judiciary Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. Died in committee when legislature adjourned. |
| New Hampshire HB 1422 | Declares that no New Hampshire court shall enforce foreign law or a state law enforcing foreign law if such enforcement violates an individual’s or corporation’s rights under the New Hampshire constitution or the United States Constitution. | Referred to Interim Study by Senate Judiciary Committee 5/8/12. |
| New Jersey AB 919 | Provides that a foreign law may only be recognized by a court in New Jersey if it does not violate any right guaranteed by the Constitution of this State or of the United States of America. | Formally withdrawn by author 5/10/12. |
| New Mexico SJR 14 (Constitutional Amendment) | Provides “The courts provided for in this article, when exercising their judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States constitution, the constitution of New Mexico, statutes of the United States and federal regulations adopted pursuant thereto, established common law, New Mexico statutes and state regulations adopted pursuant thereto and, if necessary, the law of another state of the United States, provided that the law of the other state does not include Sharia law. The courts shall not consider or apply a rule of comity to the legal precepts of other nations or cultures, international law, laws promulgated by foreign governments or national laws of foreign countries if the consideration or application of the foreign precepts or laws would violate the public policy of the state of New Mexico or reduce or impair the rights of any resident of the state of New Mexico existing under New Mexico statutes or common law governing child custody, rights of married persons, property rights, protection from domestic violence or any criminal law. The courts shall not consider or apply Sharia law. The provisions of this section shall apply to all cases before the respective courts, including, but not limited to, cases of first impression.” | In Senate Rules Committee. Died when legislature adjourned. |
| North Carolina HB 640 | Declares “it to be the public policy of this State to protect its citizens from the application of foreign law that would result in the violation of a right of a natural person guaranteed by the North Carolina Constitution or the United States Constitution. The public policies expressed in this section shall apply only to actual or foreseeable violations of a constitutional right resulting from the application of the foreign law.” | In House Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee C. Carried over from 2011 session. |
| Oklahoma HB 1552 | Provides any court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency ruling or decision shall violate the public policy of this state and be void and unenforceable if the court, arbitration, tribunal, or administrative agency bases its rulings or decisions in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any law, rule, legal code or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted under the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions. | Approved by full House 3/17/11. In Senate Rules Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. |
| Pennsylvania HB 2029 | Provides a tribunal shall not consider a foreign legal code or system which does not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights and privileges granted under the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Pennsylvania. | In House Judiciary Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. |
| South Carolina HB 3490 | Provides “As used in this section, the term “foreign law” means any law, rule, or legal code or system established and used or applied in or by another jurisdiction outside of the United States or its territories…A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, mediation, or enforcement authority may not enforce a foreign law if it would violate a constitutionally guaranteed right of this State or of the United States. The provisions of this section apply only to actual or foreseeable violations of the constitutional rights of a person caused by the application of the foreign law.” | In House Judiciary Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. |
| South Carolina SB 444 | Provides “As used in this section, the term ‘foreign law’ means any law, rule, or legal code or system established and used or applied in or by another jurisdiction outside of the United States or its territories….A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative, mediation, or enforcement authority may not enforce a foreign law if it would violate a constitutionally guaranteed right of this State or of the United States. The provisions of this section apply only to actual or foreseeable violations of the constitutional rights of a person caused by the application of the foreign law.” | In Senate Judiciary Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. |
| South Dakota HB 1253 | ORIGINAL: “No court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative mediation or enforcement authority may render any judgment predicated on any religious code or enforce any provisions of any religious code.” AS AMENDED: “No court, administrative agency, or other governmental agency may enforce any provisions of any religious code.” | Signed into law by Governor 3/12/12. |
| South Dakota SB 136 | ORIGINAL: Provides any ruling or decision that makes use of international or foreign law is void and unenforceable if the court bases its ruling or decision in the matter at issue in whole or in part on any foreign law, legal code, or system that would not grant the parties affected by the ruling or decision the same fundamental liberties, rights, and privileges granted under the constitutions of the United States and South Dakota, including due process of law, freedom of religion, speech, or press, and any right of privacy or marriage as specifically provided by the constitution of this state. Foreign law, legal code, or system is any foreign law, legal code, or system of a jurisdiction outside of any state or territory of the United States, including international organizations and tribunals, and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies, or other formal or informal tribunals. Specifies the term foreign law does notinclude any tribal laws of the Native American tribes in the state. AS AMENDED: “No court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other adjudicative mediation or enforcement authority may render any judgment predicated on any religious code or enforce any provisions of any religious code.” | Deferred to 41st day (i.e. killed) by Senate Judiciary Committee 2/2/12. |
| Virginia HB 631 | Provides that court decisions and contracts and other agreements will be void as violative of the public policy of the Commonwealth where such decisions or contracts are based on foreign law, i.e., law applied in a jurisdiction outside of the United States, where the application of such foreign law would violate a person’s rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Constitution of Virginia. | Continued to 2013 by House Committee for Courts of Justice 2/10/12. |
| Virginia HB 825 | Prohibits any Virginia court or administrative agency from applying the law of any jurisdiction outside of the United States and its territories unless the application is required by the United States Constitution, the Constitution of Virginia, or any federal or state law. | Approved by House Committee for Courts of Justice 2/3/12. Continued to 2013 by House Committee for Courts of Justice 2/10/12. |
| West Virginia HB 3220 | Provides “”foreign law, legal code or system” means any law, legal code, or system of a jurisdiction outside of any state or territory of the United States, including, but not limited to, international organizations and tribunals, and applied by that jurisdiction’s courts, administrative bodies, or other formal or informal tribunals…It is the public policy of this state that the primary factor which a court, administrative agency, arbitrator, mediator or other entity or person acting under the authority of state law shall consider in granting comity to a decision rendered under any foreign law, legal code or system against a natural person in this state is whether the decision rendered either violated or would violate any right of the natural person in this state guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of West Virginia or the United States Constitution or any statute or decision under those Constitutions.” | In House Judiciary Committee. Carried over from 2011 session. Died when legislature adjourned. |
ELDER ABUSE ALERT! Muslims whitewashing sharia for senior citizens
Posted: May 14, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 11 Comments »
Muslims preying on children and now, the elderly. At this lecture, they try to create a moral equivalency between the Ten Commandments, the U.S. Constitution, and the teachings of the paedophile prophet Mohammed, a ‘champion’ of human and women’s rights, or so they say. Naturally, the subject of ‘abrogation,’ and all the violent, bigoted, and misogynistic teachings that replaced the peaceful ones in the quran are never mentioned.
This is all part of Muslim Brotherhood proxy ICNA’s (Islamic Circle of North America) campaign to make sharia law palatable to Americans.
FAST FORWARD TO 1:20
Soon, EVERY day will be Muslim Day
Posted: May 14, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 40 Comments »
They can call themselves Muslim Americans but their actions demonstrate they don’t even want to be around Americans, except when they absolutely have to, at work or school. Never have we seen a particular religion in America declaring so many special days exclusively for their followers. Apparently, they are just putting up with us, and breeding like rabbits until they have enough muslim voters to turn America into an Islamic state. After all, they’ve already put one of their own into the White House.
With a quick search, we can find a myriad of Muslim (ONLY) Days. Starting from the most repugnant:
MUSLIM DAY OF PRAYER AT THE US CAPITAL - Muslims gather on the lawn of the US Capitol Building, prostrate themselves on their dirty prayer rugs, then pray for Islam to be the law of the land. OUR land. Barack Hussein Obama approves of this spectacle at OUR capitol, but he has cancelled the National Day of Prayer at the White House.
MUSLIM DAYS at STATE CAPITALS - There have been several this year and plans are to hold Muslim Days in every state once a year. Muslim squat and pray on the lobby floor of our State Capital buildings, making it impossible for non-Muslim to pass through.
MUSLIM FAMILY DAYS at PARKS like Six Flags Great Adventure, Playland, and other local parks. Only Muslims are allowed entry into the parks that day and park employees are not permitted to wear shorts.
MUSLIM DAY PARADE in NYC - Not much parading goes on but a lot of praying in the streets where Muslims spread out their rugs and raise their asses in prayer for world domination.
MUSLIM ONLY SPELLING COMPETITIONS
And now, MUSLIM SPORTS DAY (video below)
[UPDATED] MEDIA ALERT: ’60 MINUTES’ – CBS 7PM (Eastern time) tonight
Posted: May 13, 2012 Filed under: Islam in America 37 Comments »
’60 Minutes’ is doing a segment on the radical Islamist who created the Gulen schools in America that are being funded with millions of US taxpayer dollars. Let’s see if their reporting is cloaked in the usual left wing, pro-Islam bias or if they expose the truth.
Turkish imam Fetullah Gülen — a man who some have called the world’s most dangerous Islamist. Gülen directs his global Islamic movement not from the Middle East, but from Pennsylvania’s Pocono Mountains.
GulenNews In the past, the Ottoman Empire could not defeat the West by the sword, so now Fethullah Gulen’s community systematically employs very different tactics to bring the West under Islamic rule. For profoundly anti-democratic goals they use America’s democratic values-freedom of speech, political correctness, tolerance, and multiculturalism-as tools for disseminating Gulen’s ideology. “You move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers…until the conditions are ripe… If you do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads. The time is not yet right. You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power, until you have brought to your side all the power of the constitutional institutions in Turkey… The work to be done is in confronting the world.
Before you watch the show, please check these links for some good background on Gulen:
education-jihad-comes-to-america-via-turkish-gulen-charter-schools-funded-by-you
the-most-dangerous-islamist-in-the-world-has-been-lauded-by-bill-and-hillary-clinton
HERE’S A PREVIEW OF TONIGHT’S SHOW:
H/T WALID SHOEBAT
Recent Comments