SWEDEN: ‘Another’ violent attack by Muslims on Muhammad cartoonist, Lars Vilk
Posted: February 22, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 7 Comments »
Once again, so-called ‘moderate’ Muslims shut down free speech for Swedish artist, Lars Vilk (best known for his Muhammad the Dog cartoons) during his lecture on ‘free speech’ at Karlstad University on Feb. 21 2012.
This follows a similar attack on Vilks by Muslims in November 2011: sweden-savage-muslim-art-students-attack-police-and-totally-disrupt-lecture-on-freedom-of-speech-with-artist-lars-vilks
At the beginning of the video, you can see Lars Vilks being pulled out by bodyguards, next you can hear the jihadists making death threats. The background noise is the slideshow continuing showing muhammad dog cartoons etc. The speech continued after the violent Muslims were expelled from the building.
Vilka has been attacked before during public meetings and Muslims have on several occasions tried to kill him and burn down his home. The Swedish legal system has no trouble handling cases of attempted murder, assaults and threats…..EXCEPT when Muslims are the perpetrators.
RELATED STORIES:
home-of-swedish-muhammad-artist-lars-vilks-firebombed
swedish-artist-attacked-by-savage-muslim-pigs
bravo-sweden-finally-gets-some-chutzpah
lars-vilks-swedish-motoon-artists-latest-muhammad-cartoon
‘HOLLYWOODOPHOBIA’ from Iran
Posted: February 20, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 13 Comments »I guess now that Iran has convinced a child of Hollywood, Sean Stone (Oliver’s son) to convert to Islam, it is time to start a war against ‘Hollywoodism’ (aka Zionism).
OOPS! ‘Honor’ killing of 16-year-old Palestinian girl not so honorable after all
Posted: February 16, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 30 Comments »
A Palestinian mother waited for her 16-year-old daughter to go to bed, then tied a rope around her neck and strangled her to death. The woman murdered her own daughter after neighbors lied to her that the girl had an affair with their son.
Emirates 24/7 (H/T Gail LR) The crime had remained underground for a while before it was revealed by police and a Palestinian female activist, who described it as “one of the most heinous criminal acts” in Palestine.
Just before the girl was buried, her aging grandmother (father’s mother), swayed slowly towards the coffin with tears rolling on her wrinkled skin, pulled out the girl’s hair and tied a white tape around it. “This is more than a symbol of her chastity and purity…it is a proof,” the grandmother said to the mourners.
The crime took place in Bait Oula, a tiny village in the West Bank town of Hebron and it was publicized several weeks after it was perpetrated by the mother. Residents, who spoke to the Palestinian Arabic language daily Donia Al Watan, said the mother had already been cruel to her daughter as she used to force her to do all household work because she does not like female offspring.
It was this cruelty that made her rush and murder the girl without bothering to check if what neighbours said about her daughter was true. “Just go and see your daughter’s pictures on my son’s mobile phone,” the neighbouring woman told the mother after an argument, according to the paper.
“The mother then started her plan to kill her daughter…residents said she had made her daughter clean the house for two days so the family will be prepared to receive would-be mourners on their daughter’s death.” After the murder, the family left the girl in her bed all the night. In the morning, they went straight to hospital and said their daughter had died of heart attack.
“But doctors noticed the swelling in her neck and that her body was bluish….they informed the authorities, who later wrested a confession about the murder…the mother said she killed her to wash off shame and clean the family’s honour….a day later, hospital tests showed the girl was still virgin and pure….it was a hasty crime of honour, which has never been marred or even touched.”
So-called “honor killings” are committed regularly in traditional Arab societies that enforce strict separation between the sexes and view an unmarried woman’s unsupervised contact with a man, even by telephone, as a stain on the family’s reputation. There were nine such killings in the West Bank last year, and Jordan reports about 20 every year.
Muslims around the world did their best to destroy Valentine’s Day
Posted: February 15, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 24 Comments »Islamic clerics issued fatwas against it, Iranian leaders forbade celebration of it, Pakistanis protested it, shouting anti-Western slogans and setting fire to decadent, anti-Islamic symbols of Valentine’s Day.
Apparently, most of the people ignored them as evidence of Valentine-filled stores and eager customers waiting to buy Valentine’s Day products could be found all around Pakistan and other Muslim countries.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
muslims-spew-venom-about-valentines-day
who-could-ruin-valentines-day-better-than-a-muslim
once-again-valentines-day-has-muslims-foaming-at-the-mouth
valentines-day-is-a-virus-in-the-muslim-world
muslim-fanatical-fatwas-against-valentines-day
Egyptian TV says, “Blue Jeans made in Israel cause infertility in Arab women”
Posted: February 13, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 34 Comments »
Muhammad Al-Mane’i of the Sinai Bedouins claimed, “There was a time when they would bring us jeans that used to have belts. If you looked at these belts from the front, you’d find a secret compartment that had a magnet inside. When we asked what these magnets were, we were told that they cause sterility.”
Middle East Media Reseach Institute (MEMRI) The reporter then asked Al-Mane’i whether his intention was to state that these jeanscause infertility in Arab women, to which Al Mane’i responded, “Exactly… There was a time when these jeans with belts would invade us from Israel, and we used to take the magnets out and chuck them away. “
The reporter concluded the segment saying, “Israeli products contain lethal poison. You might not feel this poison now, but you will in the future. Israel will remain an enemy lying in wait for Egypt, no matter what happens and regardless of agreements, because Israel has its eye set on Egypt.”
It is possible that Al Mane’i was referring to magnets that helped belts stay closed, but Israeli manufacturers did not consider the accusation worthy of comment, conjecturing that it is either a result of rampant anti-Semitism or that the source is an Arab jeans manufacturer who knows that Gaza markets are filled with Israeli products.
‘DEAD MAN WALKING’ – Saudi blogger must flee country because of Tweets about the Paedophile Prophet Muhammad
Posted: February 9, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 35 Comments »
What are the consequences of just three tweets? For Hamza Kashgari, a Saudi blogger who tweeted about the Islamic prophet Mohammad on his birthday, the result was more than 30,000 responses in one day, death threats and a call by the king of Saudi Arabia for his arrest.
THE BLAZE The Daily Beast reports that Kashgari removed the tweets posted last week, apologized and asked for forgiveness. But it was too late. He has since had to flee the country for his safety.
Here is what Kashgari originally tweeted, according to the Daily Beast:
“On your birthday, I will say that I have loved the rebel in you, that you’ve always been a source of inspiration to me, and that I do not like the halos of divinity around you. I shall not pray for you,” he wrote in one tweet.
“On your birthday, I find you wherever I turn. I will say that I have loved aspects of you, hated others, and could not understand many more,” he wrote in a second.
“On your birthday, I shall not bow to you. I shall not kiss your hand. Rather, I shall shake it as equals do, and smile at you as you smile at me. I shall speak to you as a friend, no more,” he concluded in a third.
Since leaving for Southeast Asia yesterday, Kashgari told the Daily Beast that he will never go home, saying “It is impossible. There is no way.”
International Business Times reports that some have placed a 10,000 riyals (about $2,666) reward on Kashgari’s head with others saying he was a “dead man walking.”
Ahmed Al Omran, who writes the blog Saudi Jeans, as saying that more conservative Saudi’s often watch social media sites for controversial statements, such as Kashgari’s. He says he believes they are using Kashgari’s statement to “take advantage of the situation, make an example out of him, and show their strength.”
According to the Daily Beast, even though Kashgari retracted his statement and deleted his Twitter account, he still says he sees these events playing out in the “process toward freedom,“ considering himself a ”scapegoat for a larger conflict.”
Watch as Islamic cleric Sheikh Nasser Al Omar breaks down in tears during a speech while asking the king to have Kashgari arrested and charged with apostasy, which is punishable by death:
MUSLIM Baghead throws a hissy fit at police over arrest of Muslim man
Posted: February 7, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 79 Comments »After she starts waving a Quran in their faces, they shove her in the police car, too. Then she really starts shrieking like a sow in heat.
Can anyone understand/translate what is being said here?
EGYPT wants to blame the deadly soccer riots on everybody but themselves
Posted: February 6, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 12 Comments »Blame the ISRAELIS. Blame the AMERICANS. Blame the IRANIANS. Getting warmer.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
egyptian-mp-blames-america-and-israel-for-the-fatal-soccer-riots
egypt-deadly-riots-at-soccer-stadium-at-least-3-dead-1000-injured
“Palestinian children are fertilizer?”
Posted: February 3, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 18 Comments »Arab Muslims believe that their children’s blood is the fertilizer that will saturate the ‘pure’ land of Palestine.
Gee, that’s funny, I always thought the blood of Palestinian children was used by the Jews for making matzoh?
EUROPE: Muslims declare ‘jihad’ on all dogs
Posted: February 2, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 115 Comments »
A Dutch Muslim politician has called for a ban on dogs in The Hague, the third-largest city in the Netherlands. Islamic legal tradition holds that dogs are ‘unclean’ animals, and some say the call to ban them in Holland and elsewhere represents an attempted encroachment of Islamic Sharia law in Europe.
Stonegate Institute This latest canine controversy — which the Dutch public has greeted with a mix of amusement and outrage — follows dozens of other Muslim-vs-dog-related incidents in Europe. Critics say it reflects the growing assertiveness of Muslims in Europe as they attempt to impose Islamic legal and religious norms on European society.
The Dutch dustup erupted after Hasan Küçük, a Turkish-Dutch representative on The Hague city council for the Islam Democrats, vehemently opposed a proposal by the Party for the Animals (Partij voor de Dieren) to make the city more dog friendly.
According to a January 28 report in the Amsterdam-based newspaper De Telegraaf, Küçük counter-argued that keeping dogs as pets is tantamount to animal abuse and he then called for the possession of dogs in The Hague to be criminalized.
According to its website, the Islam Democrats [ID] party is “founded on the Islamic principles of justice, equality and solidarity. ID is a bottom-up response to the large gap between the Muslim and immigrant communities and local politics…ID focuses on the political awareness within the Muslim and immigrant communities. Awareness about the need to organize,
but also the need for mutual support.” Paul ter Linden, who represents the Dutch Freedom Party (PVV) on The Hague city council, responded to Küçük by saying: “In this country pet ownership is legal. Whoever disagrees with this should move to another country.”
Dutch political commentators believe Küçük’s declarations are a provocation designed to stir up the Muslim population in The Hague. Muslims — who now make up more than 12% of the city’s population of 500,000 — view dogs as ritually unclean animals and Küçük’s call for a ban on them is a sure vote-getter, they say.
The incident in Holland follows dog-related controversies in other European countries.
IN SPAIN, two Islamic groups based in Lérida — a city in the northeastern region of Catalonia where 29,000 Muslims now make up around 20% of the city’s total population — asked local officials to regulate the presence of dogs in public spaces so they do not “offend Muslims.”
Muslims demanded that dogs be banned from all forms of public transportation including all city buses as well as from all areas frequented by Muslim immigrants. Muslims said the presence of dogs in Lérida violates their religious freedom and their right to live according to Islamic principles.
After the municipality refused to acquiesce to Muslim demands, the city experienced a wave of dog poisonings. More than a dozen dogs were poisoned in September 2011 (local media reports here, here, here, here and here) in Lérida’s working class neighborhoods of Cappont and La Bordeta, districts that are heavily populated by Muslim immigrants and where many dogs have been killed over the past several years.
Local residents taking their dogs for walks say they have been harassed by Muslim immigrants who are opposed to seeing the animals in public. Muslims have also launched a number of anti-dog campaigns on Islamic websites and blogs based in Spain.
IN BRITAIN, which has become “ground zero” for Europe’s canine controversies, blind passengers are being ordered off buses or refused taxi rides because Muslim drivers or passengers object to their “unclean” guide dogs.
In Reading, for example, one pensioner, a cancer sufferer, was repeatedly confronted by drivers and asked to get off the bus because of his guide dog. He also faced hostility at a hospital and in a supermarket over the animal.
In Nottingham, a Muslim taxi driver refused to carry a blind man because he was accompanied by his guide dog. The taxi driver was later fined £300 ($470).
In Stafford, a Muslim taxi driver refused to carry an elderly blind couple from a grocery store because they were accompanied by their seeing-eye dog.
In Tunbridge Wells, Kent, a blind man was turned away from an Indian restaurant because the owner said it was against his Muslim beliefs to allow dogs into his establishment.
In London, a bus driver prevented a woman from boarding a bus with her dog because there was a Muslim lady on the bus who “might be upset by the dog.” As the woman attempted to complain, the doors closed and the bus drove away. When a second bus arrived, she again tried to embark, but was stopped again, this time because the driver said he was Muslim.
Also in Britain, police sniffer dogs trained to spot terrorists at train stations may no longer come into contact with Muslim passengers, following complaints that it was offensive to their religion.
A report for the Transport Department advised that the animals should only touch passengers’ luggage because it is considered “more acceptable.” British Transport Police still use sniffer dogs — which are trained to detect explosives — with any passengers regardless of faith, but handlers are now more aware of “cultural sensitivities.”
Sniffer dogs used by police to search mosques and Muslim homes are now being fitted with leather bootees to cover their paws so that they do not cause offense.
Critics say the complaints are just another example of Muslims trying to force their rules and morals on British society. Tory MP Philip Davies said: “As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally.”
Meanwhile, Muslim prisoners in Britain are being given fresh clothes and bedding after sniffer dogs search their cells. The inmates say their bedclothes and prison uniforms must be changed according to Islamic law if they have come anywhere near dog saliva. Government rules mean prison wardens must hand out replacement sets after random drug searches to avoid religious discrimination claims.
The dogs have also been banned from touching copies of the Islamic holy book the Koran and other religious items. Prisoners are handed special bags to protect the articles.
IN SCOTLAND, the Tayside Police Department apologized for featuring a German shepherd puppy as part of a campaign to publicize its new non-emergency telephone number. The postcards are potentially offensive to the city’s 3,000-strong Muslim community.
IN NORWAY, Gry Berg, a blind woman, was denied entry into four taxis in the center of Oslo because she was accompanied by her guide dog.
IN FRANCE, Marie Laforêt, one of the country’s most well-known singers and actresses, appeared in a Paris courtroom in December to defend herself against charges that a job advertisement she placed discriminated against Muslims.
The 72-year-old Laforêt had placed an ad on an Internet website looking for someone to do some work on her terrace in 2009. She specified in the ad that “people with allergies or orthodox Muslims” should not apply “due to a small Chihuahua.” Laforêt claimed that she made the stipulation because she believed the Muslim faith saw dogs as unclean.

Because this blind Muslim woman refuses to have a guide dog, he is using a mini guide horse (This is a miserable life for a horse who is not suited to being on a leash all the time) Read about it here: guide-horse-frees-muslim-woman-from-28-years-in-her-parental-imposed-prison-of-darkness
The case was taken up by an anti-discrimination group called the Movement against Racism and for Friendship between Peoples (MRAP), which lodged a complaint against Laforêt.
Laforêt’s lawyer said his client “knew that the presence of a dog could conflict with the religious convictions of orthodox Muslims. It was a sign of respect.” But Muslims rejected her defense.
ISLAMOLOGIC? The Prophet Muhammad married Aisha at 6 and consummated it when she was 9 because of global warming
Posted: January 31, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 47 Comments »You see, Prophet Mo should not be labeled a paedophile because he had sex with his child wife. In warmer climates, little girls reach puberty early, and apparently, Aisha was ‘hot to trot’ at age nine.
Afghan woman choked to death by husband and mother-in-law for giving birth to a third daughter
Posted: January 30, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 52 Comments »An Afghan MUSLIM mother-in-law helped her son ‘tie up and choke his wife to death’ for burdening family by having a third daughter instead of a son.
UK DAILY MAIL (H/T Susan K) Mother-in-law Wali Hazrata is said to have tied the feet of 22-year-old Stori, which allowed the victim’s local militia member husband Sher Mohammad to strangle her. The two-month-old baby girl was not hurt in the incident, in the village of Mahfalay, in the north eastern Kunduz province’s Khanabad district, on Saturday.
The murdered woman’s husband has since fled, and Hazrata remains in custody. The husband is believed to be a fighter with an illegal armed militia, and local villagers said Stori often asked her him to lay down his weapons.
One neighbour said: ‘She lived in a hell not a house. But then she also asked her husband to stay home and avoid going out with these thugs.’
Afghan women’s rights activists highlighted the incident. Nadira Gya, director for Kunduz Women’s affairs, said: ‘It was a brutal crime committed against an innocent woman.’ Violence and abuse against women continues to be a major problem in Afghanistan, a decade after U.S.-led troops brought down the Taliban regime.
Last month, police found a teen bride who had been locked in a toilet for six months at her husband’s house in neighboring Baghlan province. She was burned and beaten, and had her fingernails pulled out.
British charity Oxfam said 87 per cent of Afghan women report having experienced physical, sexual or psychological violence or forced marriage.
Dutch Muslims want to ban dogs in the city
Posted: January 29, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania 75 Comments »
Muslim dogophobia isn’t sitting well with pet lovers in the Hague. Most say, “keep the dogs, ban the Muslims.“
MESSAGE TO ALL DUTCH DOG OWNERS: Beware for your dogs. Muslims are well known for poisoning pet dogs in other cities.
Islam in Europe Hasan Küçük, Hague councilor for the Islam Democrats, says dogs should be banned as pets in the city, reports De Telegraaf. The Muslim party says that the animals belong in nature, not inside the house. Küçük says that keeping dogs is animal abuse and should therefore be criminalized.
He responded sharply during a council debate last Thursday, when the Party for Animals suggested more consideration for dogs. Paul ter Linden (PVV councillor) responded saying that pets are the norm in the Netherlands, and whoever disagrees should move to another country.
MUSLIM DOGOPHOBIA:
spain-muslims-carry-out-jihad-on-dogs
spain-muslims-are-poisoning-dogs-because-they-consider-them-to-be-filth
spain-muslims-want-dogs-banned-from-buses-and-public-areas
another-turkish-genocide-this-time-its-dogs
uk-muslim-beats-the-crap-out-of-his-sweet-labrador-puppy-viewer-discretion-advised
maryland-muslim-man-charged-with-killing-his-stepdaughters-dog-and-threatening-to-kill-her
uk-muslim-thug-cuts-off-his-puppys-ear-after-a-fight-with-his-girlfriend
screw-the-law-uk-muslims-refuse-to-allow-guide-dogs-to-ride-in-buses-or-taxis
australian-taxi-driver-tells-blind-woman-put-your-guide-dog-in-the-trunk-or-get-out
more-muslim-hysteria-dogophobia
And you thought the Islamomaniacal outrage over cartoons had ended with the Muslim shakedown of Molly Norris’ ‘Everybody Draw Muhammad Day’
Posted: January 28, 2012 Filed under: IslamoMania, Laughing at Islam 20 Comments »
Muslim death threats on cartoonists like Molly Norris forced her to change her name and go into hiding. But cartoon outrage never dies, it just gets redirected at anyone who dares to exercise freedom of expression by drawing an image of the paedophile prophet Muhammad.
(One would think that even inbred Muslim morons would come to realize that by protesting these cartoons and threatening the people who created them, their outrage gets the cartoons far more public attention than they ever would have had if they simply ignored them )
BBC Now, the president of a London university atheist society has resigned over a row about an image of the Prophet Muhammad. The society at University College London (UCL) published an image on its Facebook page showing “Jesus and Mo” having a drink at a bar.
The atheist group was asked by the UCL union to remove it, but refused and started a petition defending its freedom of expression. A student Muslim group began a counter-petition asking for its removal.
UCL’s Atheist, Secularist and Humanist society said its president Robbie Yellon was stepping down to be replaced by former vice president Michael Thor. ”Robbie stepped aside because he signed up as president to organise events and run a student society.” ”He did not appreciate the stress he would be under when dealing with a controversy like this, so he wanted to make way for someone else.”
The Ahmadiyya Muslim Youth Association association is continuing with its protest against the image, saying it has wider implications.
Adam Walker, the association’s national spokesperson, said the two student groups had worked well together in the past and said the offence was unnecessary. ”There is no need to print these things other than to cause offence and history has told us that these things cause offence.”
The image that started the controversy was taken from an online satirical comic called Jesus and Mo. The twice-weekly comic strip, running since 2005, depicts Jesus and what creators say is a “body double” of Muhammad talking to a barmaid.
The row has prompted debate on the internet with prominent academic and author Richard Dawkins backing the atheist society. UCL Union (UCLU) said in a statement: “The atheist society has agreed they will take more consideration when drawing up publicity for future events.
“The society was asked to remove the image because UCLU aims to foster good relations between different groups of students and create a safe environment where all students can benefit from societies regardless of their religious or other beliefs.”

































Recent Comments