BARE NAKED ISLAM

It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you

Sharia-compliant CNN’s Chris Cuomo compares drawing cartoons of Mohammed to calling blacks ‘niggers’

by 49 Comments

And Pamela Geller cuts him down to size. YES!

Filed Under: Islam in America

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. I looked up Chris to see if his bf is black or white, & I actually found pics of him with a couple of women. I didn’t look further; because I don’t care, I was looking to make a “racism” point. Still, now I wonder: Isn’t CC homosexual?

    Regardless, perhaps CC’s a typical Beta Male: He must be desperate for a reason to prove that he, a “white man,” is valuable to the New World Order; & should be spared. All the Evil in the world has been taught for generations (for example, with Obama teaching Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals in university setting) to the masses, to create the most confusion. OWO keeps us divided, distracted by its petty & gratuitous atrocities. Anyway, here’s CC giving Lemonhead a smooch. I point this out as a skin color thing, like DeBlasio, DeNiro, etc., because I assume (still do) that CC’s homosexual. Fascinating how Muslims & Leftists decry “Nationalism,” etc., until it comes to their own.

    Reply

  2. Bonni, I came to this article after searching for “Chris Cuomo.” This video, or whatever was here, is gone. Still, the reason I’m here . . . Someone called Chris “Fredo;” & Chris went off, saying that “fredo” is their weak brother in “the Godfather;” & an insult. It’s like “n*” to a black person, he says. Typical Leftist or Muslim supremacist “offense taken” intimidation to shut others up from pointing out he’s wearing no clothes. I’ve never actually watched or read the Godfather; but I think it’s racist for Chris to make it appear that all Italians base their behavior on a movie glorifying Italian Mob Terrorists.” It’s like all the Evil in the world is combining to form an “Inclusive” World Order. Make everything standard across the board.

    https://twitter.com/realsaavedra/status/1161081413120090113

    Reply

    • This story has been all over the news today. Cuomo is an idiot. Now he will be called Fredo for the rest of his life. If he had ignored the guy who called him that, it wouldn’t have blown up to be the big story it is. Serves him right.

      Reply

  3. By the way, the enemedia seems to be getting stupider by the moment. Chris Cuomo is comparing a very derisive racial slur to a critical cartoon?! LMAO I bet even average CNN watchers (especially black people) had to be TRULY offended by that comparison. No wonder CNN’s ratings drop by lower than the sewers by the hour.

    Reply

  4. Cuomo used a very offensive word “Islamophobe” which indicates that one’s fear of Islam is unfounded and that the person in question has a type of mental illness.

    To be suspicious and wary of Islam is not unfounded. It is a very normal reaction to understanding what Islam is really about.

    Secondly, PG tried to school him on the real reason why muslims wanted a mosque at ground zero which is their way of commemorating a conquest more that establishing a needed place of worship. It is “giving the middle finger” to America to build a mosque at ground zero. Its what Muslims do. When they have a conquest, they tear down other religious buildings and put mosques on top of them. Chris Cuomo is not a good journalist simply because he is not a good listener. He has his mind made up about everything with a narrow viewpoint before he even interviews.

    An interview is an information gathering activity, not a set up for the interviewer to try to inflict their own opinions upon the interviewed or to use the interviewed as a platform to express their own opinions to the audience. Cuomo needs to go back to journalism school to learn this very basic concept. And shame on CNN.

    Reply

  5. Pamela gets drawn into a ridiculous argument about whether depicting Mohammed is offensive. She should just admit that yes, it is offensive, but why do we do it? Islam tells us they will kill us if we depict Mohammed, not because Muslims are offended but because it is against sharia law. Muslims are not outraged about the depiction of Mohammed per se, they are outraged that the infidel kuffir has the temerity to depict Mohammed, which is a different matter entirely!

    we are told we will be killed for not following sharia law, and if we then conform to sharia law (by not depicting Mohammed) we have submitted to Islam. Ergo, we have to depict Mohammed – not because we want to give offence but because we refuse to submit to Islam. The reason 99.999% of media outlets refuse to depict Mohammed is not because they don’t want to offend Muslims but because they are terrified of Islam – which is the whole point of Islam and why they will (unless stopped) eventually gain control of the West. I have been made victorious through terror, stated Mohammed. Terror works, even if Liberals pretend it is not fear but good manners that they abide by.

    Reply

    • Very well stated sir. They start out wanting an inch. But the inch becomes a foot which becomes a mile which becomes 10 miles etc. the trick is don’t give them an inch.

      Reply

  8. Typical democRAT, liberal, progressive, islam pandering, little, talk over, interrupt, repeat, shout down, little man complex, used camel salesman.

    Answer please: Would you buy your mother a used car from this fast talking con man ?

    Would you loan him $100.00 ’till payday ?

    Would you allow him to move in without a deposit ?

    How about dating your little sister ?

    Reply

  9. Cuomo is insane. Everything that Obama says about what is “right” in his eyes are incredibly offensive to me, and they are fundamentally WRONG. I’m not going to tell people who fall all over themselves in praise of Obama that he shouldn’t be able to communicate his disparaging lies, because it is his RIGHT to do so. Everything that Cuomo believes in politically is deeply offensive to me, but that is his RIGHT, because we have a constitution that gives him that right.

    I’m very sure that there are millions more Americans who find offense in progressive/collectivist ideology than there are Muslims in America who scream and make fools of themselves over cartoons of their “prophet,” and yet, this idiot believes that our rights should be stemmed, because…Muslims might want to kill other folks because of it?

    There is something fundamentally flawed physically with the brain of your average leftist, because one cannot be this argumentative about something so innocuous as a cartoon and have a working brain at the same time. Muslims MURDER you for speaking your mind, and they want to blame the person for speaking their mind? It’s like blaming Jews for the holocaust, because they wouldn’t stop being Jews. The insanity of it is endless.

    Reply

    • John, I feel sorry for you! You’re the one who needs attention. You accused Pamela Geller of everything but the kitchen sink just because she wouldn’t post your blog?! How babyish!

      I write blogs about Islam too. And I draw pictures – many of which are extremely politically incorrect. Nobody pays me a dime. I don’t even want to make money off exposing Islam – and if I were paid I would recycle all money into fighting Islam.

      It isn’t about YOU. It isn’t about ME. It’s about EVERYBODY. And it’s about getting the truth out and fighting the political elite leftists who have their own agenda.

      I applaud Pamela Geller. I applaud Bare Naked Islam and others who stick their necks on the line to fight the Islamic cult.

      What blog do you write anyway?! I only ask because I want to add it to the list of things I don’t care about…

      Reply

  12. Pamela Geller – 1 Stupid Journalist – 0!

    She thrashed him. He even bullied her by trying to drown her out but that didn’t work.

    I was impressed.

    Follow me on Twitter I am “Islamic Toilet”. Facebook suspended me again for 30 days for telling the truth about Islam.

    Reply

    • So I take it that Facebook is also shariah compliant. What a damn shame! So I take it if someone told unpleasant facts about Judaism or Christianity then there would be no problem?? So long as Facebook treats talk on all religions the same then I don’t see the problem. BUT if they make special accessions to Islam then there is a major problem.

      Reply

  13. Sorry, but though she has earned a Muslim hit on her head, Pamela Geller is no hero, she’s a FRAUD. She’s like Madalyn Murray O’Hair and her American Atheists, a shrill shrew only out to co-opt an issue for her only personal gain by trying to generate cheap controversy. Pretending to be a champion of free speech is her biggest con, because she only wants freedom to receive speaking fees for interviews like the above. In actual practice she bans anybody from posting on her blog she doesn’t like. She did it to me this month. She wants to be the Pope of Anti-Jihadists, like O’Hair wanted to be the Pope of Atheism. How often does she use her blog to plug BNI or any of the hundreds of other blogs? Where is her blog’s list of blogs for everybody to explore? When has she created an org. for anti-jihad bloggers and promised to share revenues from her self-publicity efforts? Never, get it?

    She claims to have no problem with mosques all over New York and America. Sorry, I do. Is she lying to the interviewer for her personal advancement? Is she telling the truth? Then she’s fired herself as a leader.

    What is her real agenda? She’s a Jew first and American second, a bare naked front for Israel, and little more, who finds it convenient to wrap herself in the red-white-blue and confuse the issue. She is well aware that for centuries Jews preferred to live in the Muslim World to the Christian World, and seems to want to leave that option open in the future. She will never make a stand to stop the incorporation of the U.S. into the Muslim World as long as it’s done via mass immigration, which she never takes a courageous stand again.

    In short, there’s still no real leader representing the majority of Americans, and she definitely won’t be it. The fight to defeat Islam is way bigger than her, and I don’t recommend supporting her actively, although watching her antics from the sidelines is amusing and who can stand to miss the show?

    Reply

    • TLW, well I can certainly understand why Pamela banned you from her blog. She has been a big supporter of BNI, unlike Robert Spencer. I don’t need her to “plug my blog.” I have developed a very large audience all by myself.

      If she makes money doing what she does, good for her. I wish I could earn the kind of money she does for her efforts but I am unwilling to put my face out in public as Pamela does. Yes, she supports Israel, as do I, but she is American first and foremost.

      Shame on you for trashing the leading anti-Islam fighter in this country. I suspect you are just jealous because your blog is virtually unknown in this arena, as are you. Do us a favor and don’t post here anymore or I will ban you, too.

      Reply

    • Tlwinslow, when the media are intentionally trying to ignore, avoid, and cover up issues like the problems with mainstream Islamic doctrine, you aren’t going to get exactly what you want from someone who is trying to break through the self-censorship barriers that have been erected.

      Not to mention the fact that I don’t buy into your conspiracy theory. You seem to be confusing her staying focused on breaking media self-censorship (and even government censorship in the case of city advertising) with some sort of evil motive.

      Reply

    • Wow…just wow. Your “she’s a Jew first and American second” comment pretty much outed you as the Jew-phobe that you are. It also displays your ignorance of who and what comprises the community here. Please, go back to your “Jews are the problem” crowd, where you’ll be more comfortable.

      Reply

    • Tlwinsslow,

      You are the fraud. I couldn’t care less if Pamela Geller makes money for speaking and I hope that she does because she is obviously using that money to fight THE most dangerous enemy and THE most important issue in American history if not world history.

      You paint Pamela Geller as some shallow money grubbing Jew, but let me ask you this: when was the last time YOU risked your life for something you believe in. And make no mistake, Pamela Geller lives with the constant threat of some barbarian commiting a horrible act of violence against her, and / or her loved ones.

      You are a coward and a liar and a fraud and if I were Pamela Geller I’d boot you off my blog too.

      Reply

    • I don’t see how you could possibly accuse Pam Geller of being a “fraud” and in it for the money. Are you even aware that the vast majority of what little money she makes go towards her organizations and not only AFDI but also organizations that help potential victims of honor killings and Muslim apostates here in the U.S and even organizations that aid persecuted non-Muslims in other countries and not to mention the security she needs not only for herself but her staff. I don’t see how this is selfish or greedy. Also, as Bonni says she actually sticks her kafira neck out (both proverbially and literally) to be struck by Jihadis as the recent news shows. So I disagree with you vehemently about what you say about Geller.

      Reply

  15. I love Pamela! She is articulate and wise. This little taqiyya swallower is totally ignorant and brainwashed. I would have been tempted to say “snap out of it Chris” and help him snap out of it by slapping him across the face. Pamela handled this whole ridiculous interview with dignity and aplomb. Bully for Pamela.

    Reply

  17. These are the same “journalists” who have zero problem being viciously offensive to good and kind Christians, Christians (and Jews) who have never raped, beheaded, burnt alive, terrorized a single soul.

    It’s such a disgusting lie when they claim to be opposed to offending. They LOVE to offend. But they hate the right so much they are literally willing to bring on their own destruction. Cutting off their nose to spite their face. On a global scale.

    Reply

    • Perhaps this ‘journo’ cuomo could also do a little homework on the real/historical/practical meanings of the words or phrases “appeasement/traitor/collaborator/ fifth columnist/agent provocateur/” because at the moment he is prostituting his profession and is little more than a media whore. Real journalism?… The Bealibo Five!

      Reply

  18. My hero! So in need of female role models who don’t cringe when challenged. I heard a rumor that DC has refused to run transit ads. Anyone know if thin is true?

    Reply

  20. Chris Cuomo…. Just doing his best to promote the Muslim Brotherhood CAIR-Hamas propaganda plan which is to leverage neo-Marxist class warfare beliefs to destroy their enemies without having to answer a single question about the barbaric warlike Islamic doctrine.

    It’s sad how easy it is for Muslims to trick the ignorant neo-Marxists into fighting their ideological battles for them.

    Eventually this isn’t going to work and Muslims are going to be forced to answer direct questions about the psychopathic behavior of their ideal role model Mohammad, even on CNN.

    Reply

  21. i saw that interview pam geller sent that little liberal swine and appeaser and probable collaborator crawling back under his rock.good for her.

    Reply

  22. Actually, what is comparable to the ‘n’ word is when moslems call us kufar/kafir. It means we are dirt.

    Reply

    • I talked online to a Muslim in Saudi Arabia once and said something about how I was a “kafir”. She immediately said “Don’t use that word!” I asked why and all she would say is “I just don’t like that word.”

      It is obviously not a neutral factual term, but a dirty insult. It wouldn’t surprise me to find that she didn’t like the word because, despite being a Muslim who defends Islam, she herself probably gets called a kafir occasionally for “not being Muslim enough” and talking to “kafir” on the Internet.

      From this conversation it’s pretty obvious that kafir is an offensive term like nigger. Perhaps it should be called “the k-word”.

      Reply

  23. In this interview Pamela Geller should have emphasized the hypocrisy that when New York Times published the dung-covered and pornographic picture of Saint Mary, there was no condemnation, but that the far more innocent cartoon of Mohammad was condemned (the one that won the contest in Texas, where Mohammad’s cartoon that is being drawn says “You can’t draw me”, and the artist’s hand that is drawing the cartoon says “That’s why I draw you.”)

    Reply

    • I agree Top Secret. The NYT published the Virgin Mary image and refused to publish the Mohammed image and ther reason was publishing the Mohammed image would offend people.
      Ok, this is what I keep emphasing when I talk to people about Islam who have sutvtheir minds so loud and hard you can hear the Slam!!!

      Both images are offensive to a particular group of people. So the reason the NYT gave ” not cause offense to a group of people is a lie, just an excuse that hids the real reason.
      The real reason is the ” preceived threat” that Muslims would be offended and Muslims who are offended express those offended feelings by doing acts of violence and/ or they threaten acts of violence.

      Catholics,( who could be expected to be particularly offended by the virgin Mary image )do NOT express their offended feelings by doing acts of violence ( or threatning to do acts of violence) .
      So the NYT refused to e publish the Mohammed image, not because of the possibility of offending a particular group of people, but because of the FEAR that a particular group of people would do acts of violence…….In addition I am assuming that there were no actual threats of violence. So, NYT just fears the possibility of violence….

      Isnt this pathetic!

      If NYT were to take precautions they could reduce the possibility of violence and the amount and kind of violence by a considerable amount….( but not eliminate it completely) . But if NYT did take precautions against violence by Muslims, First, the NYT would be admitting that Muslims, that “particular group” can not be trusted, can not control their feelings ( as civilized people do when confronted by an image that offends them) . And the NYT would admit that, even with additional security, the they are afraid of violence, admitting that the Muslims are so powerful that no security can fully protect them, that Muslims would be able to do an act of violence when ever and however they like, and NYT could not be fully protected.
      Secondly, that they themselves , NYT , are obeying this group’s wishes, their laws by censoring their own publication. NYT is admitting that Muslims are so powerful that fear of what they could do caused a major newspaper to censor its publication… that they are not upholding the Free Speech Amendment, that they are putting limits and conditions of the First Amendment. That they are denying the First Amendment that they depend on for their livelihood…..
      And Thirdly, that by refusing to publish the Mohammed image NYT is giving the power to this group united by a religion to cause this level fear of violence over and over again. They have reinforced the lesson that if you threaten violence, the cowardly Americans will give up their precious freedoms!!!
      And instead of trying to unravel this tangle of religion, fear, bullying threats and violence, this major newspaper refuses to acknowledge that there is a problem at all!!
      How pathetic!!!

      Reply

  25. Chris Cuomo is a little dhimmi bitch and he can’t even see it. Another libtard puke who should be ashamed of himself, but doesn’t posess enough intelligence or gray matter to do so.

    Reply

  27. Yes no doubt Geller has hit deep into politically correct world’s nerve center we owe her big time , she has made me reassess who will defend the truth when it comes to the mainstream media reporting the truth without bias , hypocrites they can not be trusted with free speech their America is counterfeit

    Reply

Leave a Reply but NO MORE THAN ONE LINK per comment