It isn't Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here:
Cookie Policy
BRITAIN: After more than 100,000 signatures on a petition against the UN Global Migration Pact, UK lawmakers must now reconsider the decision to sign onto it
British Members of Parliament will consider an official petition against the United Nations Global Compact for Migration after it received 115,817signatures opposed to it.
Breitbart The British government is committed to issuing an official response to any petition which reaches 10,000 signatures — although it has left the UN compact petition unanswered for 12 days now — while petitions which break the 100,000 signature mark must be considered by Parliament’s Backbench Business Committee for a full debate.
Hugely controversial for provisions which allegedly make migration a universal human right and expand the definition of hate speech to include criticism of mass migration, a large number of countries have already pulled out of the compact.
Leaders from more than 10o countries are due to ratify the treaty in Marrakesh Dec. 10 – 11 during a UN-hosted ‘Migration Week’, which will welcome up to 6,000 participants from intergovernmental organizations as well as “all relevant stakeholders, including civil society, the private sector, academic institutions, parliaments, diaspora communities and migrant organisations”.
In the United Kingdom, despite the prominence of mass migration and the public’s concern over it in the national discourse in recent years — and despite the Tory government having made unfulfilled pledges to reduce net immigration “from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands” in three successive elections — the compact has barely registered in the mainstream media, perhaps as a result of Brexit dominating the news-scape.
The petition rapidly acquiring over 100,000 signatures despite the near-total lack of coverage, almost entirely through online word-of-mouth and grassroots activism, therefore seems highly significant — especially with the embattled prime minister due to sign the compact in Morocco just days before a seminal vote on her “deal” with the European Union, in which she looks set to go down to a historic defeat.
The Global Compact is also increasingly embattled in the European Union, despite being championed by the bloc’s High Representative and largely devised by the government of Angela Merkel in Germany, its dominant state — with most of the anti-mass migration, pro-sovereignty governments of Central and South-Eastern Europe having pulled out.
Out in front was the United States under the pro-borders administration of President Donald Trump, which deemed the compact “simply not compatible with U.S. sovereignty” back in Dec. 2017.
This is not an official list, but as of today, from the information I have, the following countries have indicated they will NOT be signing onto the Global Migration Pact.
United States Hungary Czech Republic Croatia Slovenia Slovakia Austria Bulgaria Poland Australia Belgium Denmark Italy Israel Dominican Republic Estonia Russia Korea Japan
READERS, here is the list of 193 Member States of the United Nations. Note that Saudi Arabia the heart of Islam joined the UN in 1945 and thus had years of time to organise the OIC.
As yet I have not found any information on the stand that Islamic Nations are having about signing this Migration Pact. I suspect we in the West are being played by the Islamic Nations and that Indonesia will sign. But I cannot see Saudi Arabia opening the gates to immigration but at the same time would support migration invasion of the West.
Readers go back to 2016 as this momentum started to be planned, conceived I think in 2015.
Take note of the names in the ‘Opening’ & look at the names in the last bottom paragraph.
This objective by the UN is so deeply entrenched that even Nations refusing to sign, will eventually be hammered down. We should all leave the UN, but I don’t think any country will be brave enough to leave the UN.
Remember leaders of Nations change and a different leader voted in may support the UN Migration Pact. Hillary Clinton (USA) & Julia Gillard (Australia) would have signed if they held office now.
Government responded to “The UK should not agree the UN’s Global Compact for Migration”
Saturday, 8 December, 2018 1:12
From: “Petitions: UK Government and Parliament”
To: [redacted]
You’re receiving this email because you signed this petition: “The UK should not agree the UN’s Global Compact for Migration”.
Dear [redacted]
The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “The UK should not agree the UN’s Global Compact for Migration”.
Government responded:
The Global Compact for Migration will support global co-operation on migration without affecting the sovereignty of all countries to control their own borders.
Uncontrolled migration erodes public confidence, damages economies, and places those on the move in situations of intense vulnerability. The UK is taking significant steps to tackle uncontrolled migration by:
– Addressing the root causes of migration, through our targeted assistance for livelihoods, healthcare, education and economic development
– Tackling modern slavery and organised immigration crime
– Supporting enhanced border management
– Providing critical humanitarian support and protection for vulnerable migrants, as well as offering voluntary return and vital reintegration support to those wishing to return home
– Supporting refugees to stay in a first safe country through our humanitarian and development work in Africa, the Middle East and Asia
The Global Compact for Migration embeds these efforts within the global system, enhances cooperation between states, and sets out ways that countries may choose to deliver these objectives.
The Compact is not legally binding. It creates a framework to allow countries to work together to make global migration more beneficial for everyone.
It respects the sovereignty of all states to decide who enters their territory. It will not affect our ability to determine and implement our own migration policies, including in areas such as asylum, border controls and returns of illegal migrants.
It does not establish a ‘human right to migrate’ or create any new legal categories of migrant. It explicitly stresses that migrants are entitled to the same universal human rights as any human being, and that these are different to the legal protections available to refugees.
Too many people, including vulnerable women and girls, are taking risky journeys to migrate through dangerous channels. The Compact will help us take important steps to keep migrants around the world safer and to protect the most vulnerable, by supporting international cooperation on the protection of migrants, in line with our obligations under international law. It outlines ways of preventing exploitation, and of combating the heinous crime of modern slavery.
A key objective of the document is to support cooperation on reducing uncontrolled migration. It sets out the responsibility of countries of origin to ensure effective control of their borders, and to cooperate in accepting the return of their nationals when they no longer have the right to remain in another country. Furthermore, the text also calls on countries of origin to work with the international community to address the drivers of irregular migration, by creating economic opportunities for populations in source countries, and improving governance and respect for the rule of law.
When migration is safe and regular, it can bring great prosperity. The Compact also sets out possible actions to harness the economic benefits of safer, regular migration, for example by reducing the costs of remittances that migrants send home. These can foster economic development in source countries, helping to address some of the causes of migration.
The Compact is the result of months of intergovernmental negotiations. Though it is legally non-binding and no country can be compelled to conform with its provisions, we are aware that a small number of countries have chosen not to endorse it. We respect this choice and note that countries will be able to endorse the Compact, or cooperate with other states on delivering its objectives, at any point in the future.
This petition has over 100,000 signatures. The Petitions Committee will consider it for a debate. They can also gather further evidence and press the government for action.
The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee
Thanks,
The Petitions team
UK Government and Parliament
“When migration is safe and regular, it can bring great prosperity.” Yeah – but not when adults masquerading as children are not denied benefits and not deported.
Interesting Doublespeak… The Compact is not legally binding versus Criticism of Migration could become a Criminal Offense… the Anti-Freedom of Speech big ‘Con’ to manipulate the people & turn them into Puppets.
Socialism has truly infiltrated our Universities and consequently the United Nations and countless organisations. It is now time to declare ahimsa academic war on all ‘Degree Qualified’ People that have been brain-wrecked by anti-freedom Socialist Mentality.
Belgium will not sign? Incredible!
For those that accuse people to be racist, Dominican Republic is a black country. I know that everybody can be racist, this is mosttly for the leftist that are in favour of the global compact.
I believe UK is consider to not sign it because it fears the yellow vests.
CNI, Belgium will not sign it now, but they will debate it in Parliament, which means they could sign it later. But considering that Brussels is predicted to have a Muslim majority by 2030, the leaders would be nuts to sign it.
Uwe Hayek, well done. You also verified that apathy is high as it is in Australia because people refuse to make the effort to learn.
The uneducated can easily be conquered by the educated. That is a very serious problem when too many of the educated have been brain-wrecked by Socialist Doctrine.
I wish I could say you’re wrong but our moronic politicians are already Islamic arse kissers of the worst kind… They’ve already accepted Sharia Law and helped in the mass grooming and rape of vulnerable young kids as well as persecuting and arresting anyone who speaks out… I’m now all in for civil unrest and if the police, who have shown their willingness to defend the enemy get in the way? No mercy, you side with the enemy, YOU BECOME THE ENEMY…
Will the citizens in signatory countries that are home owners…..with an empty spare bedroom or room in their basement….be required by law to house and feed these invaders? Is that the next step?
Don’t worry readers I found the 23 objectives and more in a typical degree qualified verbose document. It interfaces with other UN policies including Human Rights.
I scan read it to discern that it is an overly complex document with a Wishlist Utopia Mentality record that it naively thinks that it can control. There is not one Degree Qualified Politician or Judge on this planet of this generation or future generations that has the persistent skills to be accurate & just in daily decision making based upon this document.
It also references Human Rights and fails to identify that the OIC has a different idea about Human Rights. The writers of this document clearly do not have ‘Philosophical Intelligence’.
The document identifies the difference between Refugees & Migrants in a reasonably accurate concept. But it does not identify the serious concerns about ‘Belief System’ of Migrants and their compatibility or lack thereof to fit into the culture of other Nations. It fails to identify the ability of refugees & migrants to assimilate or not.
It is an overly complex document, a dreamy concept that only degree qualified fools could write. The average person in every country would not have the patience to study such documents and understand its excessive boring wordy implications upon their lives.
We have no chance of closing down the United Nations founded in 1945, which failed to support its original mission objectives.
This means we the people of every Nation must change the way we fight for our right to live free. We cannot win using ‘Civil War’ action, we must fight the ‘Educated’ with stronger better ahimsa methods of higher education. This is now a deep crazy battle, the educated fighting the educated. Using violence is now a suicidal method no one either side can survive a ‘Civil War’.
The United Nations and all so-called ‘International Laws’ must be challenged by using new methods.
It will take me a minimum of 12 months to study the complex interface of UN documents.
My problem is I face an operation in 12 month’s time, in which I have a 50% chance of not surviving. You the people will have to learn a new way of academic fighting if you want to live free. Don’t rely on Universities Education they are not that good in any country. Anti-Freedom of Speech Socialism is taking over many Colleges and encouraging a return to Medieval Mentality University leadership which ruled the uneducated poor, too often unjustly.
Sharia May; you have already deserted the people by wimping out on Brexit. If you defy them again, expect riots. The people have HAD ENOUGH of being sold out to the highest bidder.
Seems to me almost everything the UN does … in some way advances the Islamisation of the world. Not good ! So pleased Australia has decided clearly not to sign this pact. Clearly those nations that DO sign (Canada ?) have decided the ‘way forward’ is Islam. Crazy !!!
This United Nations Global Migration Pact is what the globalists want and also what the Open Society Foundation of George Soros wants. And likely the Organization of Islamic Cooperation wants this. It appears like the purpose of this Global Migration Pact is to allow Muslims from dysfunctional and terrible countries to migrate into much better Western Countries, where they will have a much better life and be able to collect welfare and be able to change these Western Countries into Islamic countries that will have all the same problems that Islamic countries have. When it comes to strict Islamic Countries, normal people will not want to immigrate to these countries. Nations must be able to control their borders and control who immigrates into their nations. It is foolish to let into western countries large numbers of Muslims, who will not assimilate into these countries and will want to govern themselves with Islamic Sharia Law.
DG, That’s exactly what it is. They got the entire UN membership to OK the idea when they first presented it while Obama was still in office. Obviously, the final product was nothing close to what they claimed it was going to be.
Thank God, Donald Trump recognized how dangerous it was and announced in Dec. 2017, the US would not be signing it, though it got very little or no publicity back then. It wasn’t until Hungary also pulled out that I heard about it for the first time. And I’ve been harping about it ever since.
almost entirely through online word-of-mouth and grassroots activism … and the truth on BNI shall set you free , time for credit where credit is due spreading truth is not free anymore we lose the tool for it we lose a country and in the end we lose the war
Fortunately, we now have many countries saying “No”. I would expect China’s name to be on this list.
Now the question needs to be asked and identified. Which countries and which persons in the UN did engineer the creation of this mindless insidious ‘Migration Pact’. There is no doubt that the OIC supported this goal or created it? And dangerously cunning Saudi Arabia the heart of Islam leads the OIC.
BNI, you can add Latvia to the list that rejected the UN Migration Pact.
A Refugee organisation in Australia has criticised Morrison for refusing to sign Pact.
I am collecting volumes of information, too much crosses over in common with each other for information.
I now understand that this Pact objective began in the UN back in 2015.
I think you are aware that both NZ & Canada support signing the Pact.
NZ support has thrown me for a 6. Unbelievable that part of the ANZACS are going down this road, this may destroy the great spirit of the ANZACS annual celebration in our Nation.
I am going to have to deal with this as well. A lot of research investigation into next year.
We have traitors that want to end the ANZAC annual march in Australia.
BNI, I have been thinking about China. If they signed the Pact, they could still deal with the Muslim invasion and at the same time have the right to send in educated Chinese into any country as a Migrant & plan technological & business takeover from within.
The Migration Pact concept is insane.
Now you know why I started two years ago in my writing attacking ‘Degree Qualifications’ which is interwoven in sections of my books with reasons why.
Allan, one thing about China, the UN has never been able to force them to do anything. The UN is in hysterics over the Muslim detention camps, but China just ignores them.
And there is a truly disgraceful sight right beside a main commuter rail line into Sydney – its the Gallipoli Mosque – reminding Australians of the thousands / millions of their young men killed by the Muslim Turks in WW1. How it got building consent is a moot point.
Well all of NZ lamb is Halal killed – so they’ve made a start. But its a small country and the populace can’t support millions of freeloaders. But it also has a high population of Pacific Islanders and Maoris and you don’t piss them off – they are big guys. And the ANZACS have a score to settle with Slimes after Gallipoli and WW1.
I’m terrified NZ will sign because our PM is a stupid soft-hearted dope. She and her merry band of useful idiots will push this and the ANZACs will be over.
Bloody hell I hate that bitch but the opposition has promised to revoke any joining if elected
I have my suspicions that Jacinda Ardern hasn’t even read the contract. It’s a long document and probably beyond her attention span. I haven’t read it either, except for the basics, but then I don’t have to. If I were at the helm and about to issue a death warrant on my country, I would read the document very very carefully, then say NO, let’s NOT do this”.
Jacinda’s waffly, nebulous natter at the US summit pretty much sums her up: all smiles and sweet talk and no substance.
Is it me or does it seem like female prime ministers nearly always turn out to be bad? I’m a bit of a sexist and would not vote for a woman for president unless she was very Thatcher-like.
Strange you are all commenting on this. At high school and University, I always got on much better with my male colleagues and lecturers than my female ones. As one of the minority groups (a woman studying physics), I seemed to go against the grain by not supporting my own gender group. I also prefer male doctors and dentists. All of these preferences have arisen through personal experience.
As for Helen Clark, I detested her from the outset, and even more so when I learned she had diverted part of our taxes into Palestinian “humanitarian aid”. As a Jew and staunch Israel supporter, I was outraged by this.
A Minion, I made a similar comment to my wife recently. The world’s thinking has gone mad. Anti-Freedom Socialism since 1920 when it created ‘Political Correctness’ in Europe has brain-wrecked naïve do-gooder people.
I blame Psychology for infiltration of Politics, Education, Law & Order & Business selling its soft excuse system ideas. Psychology has weakened society encouraging the elimination of codes of honour, even Chivalry is now vanishing. Courage is vanishing being replaced by greed for money & pleasure.
And now Psychology is becoming Socialist Psychology & Muslim Psychology. How does anti-freedom belief systems become compatible with Psychology that was supposed to be open minded and objective?
Use a Shrink no way! Time to put Psychology out of business. Even the United Nations has been infiltrated by Psychology.
They will use us as a back door to Australia, as well as flooding our tiny country with illegals. Thanks but no thanks for destroying NZ and our closest ally, Adern. Most of us didn’t vote for you anyway.
I am not aware that China has any stakes in this suicidal compact.
According to some information and links I shared here the German administration of Merkel is a major driving force behind this in an attempt to not only legalize her criminal actions in retrospective but also go full speed ahead with the destabilization of Germany and Europe. Her wet dream is a reloaded Easter block totalitarian commie regime under which disobedient indigenous citizens are confronted in the streets (by misfitting migrants, that is) daily and thus easily kept in check – and down the road marginalized by out- and interbreeding.
China actually does not need to do anything. Considering they allegedly have 1 million Muslims detained in re-education camps, with China working to inhibit the practice of Islam wherever they can, I doubt many muslims would want to migrate to there.
allanivarsson says
READERS, here is the list of 193 Member States of the United Nations. Note that Saudi Arabia the heart of Islam joined the UN in 1945 and thus had years of time to organise the OIC.
As yet I have not found any information on the stand that Islamic Nations are having about signing this Migration Pact. I suspect we in the West are being played by the Islamic Nations and that Indonesia will sign. But I cannot see Saudi Arabia opening the gates to immigration but at the same time would support migration invasion of the West.
http://www.un.org/en/member-states/index.html
allanivarsson says
Readers go back to 2016 as this momentum started to be planned, conceived I think in 2015.
Take note of the names in the ‘Opening’ & look at the names in the last bottom paragraph.
This objective by the UN is so deeply entrenched that even Nations refusing to sign, will eventually be hammered down. We should all leave the UN, but I don’t think any country will be brave enough to leave the UN.
Remember leaders of Nations change and a different leader voted in may support the UN Migration Pact. Hillary Clinton (USA) & Julia Gillard (Australia) would have signed if they held office now.
https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/summit
allanivarsson says
This is what is being marketed by the UN…
https://youtu.be/LL87BK5OSz8
allanivarsson says
Readers, have a look at the country names co-sponsors in this brief document.
https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/high-level-side-event-%E2%80%9Croad-marrakech%E2%80%9D
BareNakedIslam says
Allan, Brazil no longer will be behind this now that they have elected a very Trump-like president.
allanivarsson says
Thank you BNI for that reminder.
it's me says
this is crazy and insane
BP says
Government responded to “The UK should not agree the UN’s Global Compact for Migration”
Saturday, 8 December, 2018 1:12
From: “Petitions: UK Government and Parliament”
To: [redacted]
You’re receiving this email because you signed this petition: “The UK should not agree the UN’s Global Compact for Migration”.
Dear [redacted]
The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “The UK should not agree the UN’s Global Compact for Migration”.
Government responded:
The Global Compact for Migration will support global co-operation on migration without affecting the sovereignty of all countries to control their own borders.
Uncontrolled migration erodes public confidence, damages economies, and places those on the move in situations of intense vulnerability. The UK is taking significant steps to tackle uncontrolled migration by:
– Addressing the root causes of migration, through our targeted assistance for livelihoods, healthcare, education and economic development
– Tackling modern slavery and organised immigration crime
– Supporting enhanced border management
– Providing critical humanitarian support and protection for vulnerable migrants, as well as offering voluntary return and vital reintegration support to those wishing to return home
– Supporting refugees to stay in a first safe country through our humanitarian and development work in Africa, the Middle East and Asia
The Global Compact for Migration embeds these efforts within the global system, enhances cooperation between states, and sets out ways that countries may choose to deliver these objectives.
The Compact is not legally binding. It creates a framework to allow countries to work together to make global migration more beneficial for everyone.
It respects the sovereignty of all states to decide who enters their territory. It will not affect our ability to determine and implement our own migration policies, including in areas such as asylum, border controls and returns of illegal migrants.
It does not establish a ‘human right to migrate’ or create any new legal categories of migrant. It explicitly stresses that migrants are entitled to the same universal human rights as any human being, and that these are different to the legal protections available to refugees.
Too many people, including vulnerable women and girls, are taking risky journeys to migrate through dangerous channels. The Compact will help us take important steps to keep migrants around the world safer and to protect the most vulnerable, by supporting international cooperation on the protection of migrants, in line with our obligations under international law. It outlines ways of preventing exploitation, and of combating the heinous crime of modern slavery.
A key objective of the document is to support cooperation on reducing uncontrolled migration. It sets out the responsibility of countries of origin to ensure effective control of their borders, and to cooperate in accepting the return of their nationals when they no longer have the right to remain in another country. Furthermore, the text also calls on countries of origin to work with the international community to address the drivers of irregular migration, by creating economic opportunities for populations in source countries, and improving governance and respect for the rule of law.
When migration is safe and regular, it can bring great prosperity. The Compact also sets out possible actions to harness the economic benefits of safer, regular migration, for example by reducing the costs of remittances that migrants send home. These can foster economic development in source countries, helping to address some of the causes of migration.
The Compact is the result of months of intergovernmental negotiations. Though it is legally non-binding and no country can be compelled to conform with its provisions, we are aware that a small number of countries have chosen not to endorse it. We respect this choice and note that countries will be able to endorse the Compact, or cooperate with other states on delivering its objectives, at any point in the future.
Department for International Development
Click this link to view the response online:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/232698?reveal_response=yes
This petition has over 100,000 signatures. The Petitions Committee will consider it for a debate. They can also gather further evidence and press the government for action.
The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee
Thanks,
The Petitions team
UK Government and Parliament
BP says
Now 119,275 signatures
BP says
“When migration is safe and regular, it can bring great prosperity.” Yeah – but not when adults masquerading as children are not denied benefits and not deported.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6473407/Liverpool-council-finds-24-asylum-seekers-posing-children.html
BareNakedIslam says
So, they are lying about what it is. Of course they will sign it.
allanivarsson says
BP thank you for that excellent insight.
Interesting Doublespeak… The Compact is not legally binding versus Criticism of Migration could become a Criminal Offense… the Anti-Freedom of Speech big ‘Con’ to manipulate the people & turn them into Puppets.
Socialism has truly infiltrated our Universities and consequently the United Nations and countless organisations. It is now time to declare ahimsa academic war on all ‘Degree Qualified’ People that have been brain-wrecked by anti-freedom Socialist Mentality.
Communism=Nazism=Islam says
Belgium will not sign? Incredible!
For those that accuse people to be racist, Dominican Republic is a black country. I know that everybody can be racist, this is mosttly for the leftist that are in favour of the global compact.
I believe UK is consider to not sign it because it fears the yellow vests.
BareNakedIslam says
CNI, Belgium will not sign it now, but they will debate it in Parliament, which means they could sign it later. But considering that Brussels is predicted to have a Muslim majority by 2030, the leaders would be nuts to sign it.
Uwe Hayek says
Just came back from the pub with my laptop and collected 15 signatures.
Half of the people refused as they do not even remotely understand what is going to happen.
BareNakedIslam says
UH, You did well to get 15. Sadly, I’m afraid the UK isn’t going to change its mind, no matter how many signatures it gets.
allanivarsson says
Uwe Hayek, well done. You also verified that apathy is high as it is in Australia because people refuse to make the effort to learn.
The uneducated can easily be conquered by the educated. That is a very serious problem when too many of the educated have been brain-wrecked by Socialist Doctrine.
Az gal says
Good for the British people! But you know the government. They will sign it anyway.
BareNakedIslam says
Az, of course they will. They need a few weeks to reconsider it in the legislature and the signing ceremony is on Dec. 11th.
Ordinary Fella says
I wish I could say you’re wrong but our moronic politicians are already Islamic arse kissers of the worst kind… They’ve already accepted Sharia Law and helped in the mass grooming and rape of vulnerable young kids as well as persecuting and arresting anyone who speaks out… I’m now all in for civil unrest and if the police, who have shown their willingness to defend the enemy get in the way? No mercy, you side with the enemy, YOU BECOME THE ENEMY…
Lincoln Applegate Hahn says
So, with this Pact …. J**s will now be free …. to repopulate North Africa and the Middle East ? Bonus Toot: Reciprocity is a two way street ?
David Rasch says
Indeed this is heartening news. Mayhap this is a first step to correcting the economic imbalance between those who work and those who are moslems.
BP says
Its now at 116,567 and counting …
But didn’t know about it, so thanks Bonni for posting about it.
BareNakedIslam says
We’re coming down to the wire and the more people who know about it the better.
Thomas Richard says
Will the citizens in signatory countries that are home owners…..with an empty spare bedroom or room in their basement….be required by law to house and feed these invaders? Is that the next step?
BareNakedIslam says
Eventually, no doubt.
allanivarsson says
Over my dead body.
allanivarsson says
Readers, as anyone read what the 23 objectives of the UN Migration Pact that every Nation is supposed to sign?
I have searched through volumes of global media news and so far no one has tabled the UN 23 objectives information, hiding it from the public.
allanivarsson says
Don’t worry readers I found the 23 objectives and more in a typical degree qualified verbose document. It interfaces with other UN policies including Human Rights.
I scan read it to discern that it is an overly complex document with a Wishlist Utopia Mentality record that it naively thinks that it can control. There is not one Degree Qualified Politician or Judge on this planet of this generation or future generations that has the persistent skills to be accurate & just in daily decision making based upon this document.
It also references Human Rights and fails to identify that the OIC has a different idea about Human Rights. The writers of this document clearly do not have ‘Philosophical Intelligence’.
The document identifies the difference between Refugees & Migrants in a reasonably accurate concept. But it does not identify the serious concerns about ‘Belief System’ of Migrants and their compatibility or lack thereof to fit into the culture of other Nations. It fails to identify the ability of refugees & migrants to assimilate or not.
It is an overly complex document, a dreamy concept that only degree qualified fools could write. The average person in every country would not have the patience to study such documents and understand its excessive boring wordy implications upon their lives.
We have no chance of closing down the United Nations founded in 1945, which failed to support its original mission objectives.
This means we the people of every Nation must change the way we fight for our right to live free. We cannot win using ‘Civil War’ action, we must fight the ‘Educated’ with stronger better ahimsa methods of higher education. This is now a deep crazy battle, the educated fighting the educated. Using violence is now a suicidal method no one either side can survive a ‘Civil War’.
The United Nations and all so-called ‘International Laws’ must be challenged by using new methods.
It will take me a minimum of 12 months to study the complex interface of UN documents.
My problem is I face an operation in 12 month’s time, in which I have a 50% chance of not surviving. You the people will have to learn a new way of academic fighting if you want to live free. Don’t rely on Universities Education they are not that good in any country. Anti-Freedom of Speech Socialism is taking over many Colleges and encouraging a return to Medieval Mentality University leadership which ruled the uneducated poor, too often unjustly.
Leonie Z Pipe says
Sharia May; you have already deserted the people by wimping out on Brexit. If you defy them again, expect riots. The people have HAD ENOUGH of being sold out to the highest bidder.
terry Sullivan says
she signed UK back into eaw
TrueBlueInfidel says
Seems to me almost everything the UN does … in some way advances the Islamisation of the world. Not good ! So pleased Australia has decided clearly not to sign this pact. Clearly those nations that DO sign (Canada ?) have decided the ‘way forward’ is Islam. Crazy !!!
peter thompson says
but Bill Shorten will sign it…..do not vote Labor next year or we are doomed..
Rebel Patriot says
I would sign a petition to dismantle the UN.
David Grisez says
This United Nations Global Migration Pact is what the globalists want and also what the Open Society Foundation of George Soros wants. And likely the Organization of Islamic Cooperation wants this. It appears like the purpose of this Global Migration Pact is to allow Muslims from dysfunctional and terrible countries to migrate into much better Western Countries, where they will have a much better life and be able to collect welfare and be able to change these Western Countries into Islamic countries that will have all the same problems that Islamic countries have. When it comes to strict Islamic Countries, normal people will not want to immigrate to these countries. Nations must be able to control their borders and control who immigrates into their nations. It is foolish to let into western countries large numbers of Muslims, who will not assimilate into these countries and will want to govern themselves with Islamic Sharia Law.
BareNakedIslam says
DG, That’s exactly what it is. They got the entire UN membership to OK the idea when they first presented it while Obama was still in office. Obviously, the final product was nothing close to what they claimed it was going to be.
Thank God, Donald Trump recognized how dangerous it was and announced in Dec. 2017, the US would not be signing it, though it got very little or no publicity back then. It wasn’t until Hungary also pulled out that I heard about it for the first time. And I’ve been harping about it ever since.
BLR says
almost entirely through online word-of-mouth and grassroots activism … and the truth on BNI shall set you free , time for credit where credit is due spreading truth is not free anymore we lose the tool for it we lose a country and in the end we lose the war
allanivarsson says
Fortunately, we now have many countries saying “No”. I would expect China’s name to be on this list.
Now the question needs to be asked and identified. Which countries and which persons in the UN did engineer the creation of this mindless insidious ‘Migration Pact’. There is no doubt that the OIC supported this goal or created it? And dangerously cunning Saudi Arabia the heart of Islam leads the OIC.
BareNakedIslam says
China definitely.
allanivarsson says
BNI, you can add Latvia to the list that rejected the UN Migration Pact.
A Refugee organisation in Australia has criticised Morrison for refusing to sign Pact.
I am collecting volumes of information, too much crosses over in common with each other for information.
I now understand that this Pact objective began in the UN back in 2015.
I think you are aware that both NZ & Canada support signing the Pact.
NZ support has thrown me for a 6. Unbelievable that part of the ANZACS are going down this road, this may destroy the great spirit of the ANZACS annual celebration in our Nation.
I am going to have to deal with this as well. A lot of research investigation into next year.
We have traitors that want to end the ANZAC annual march in Australia.
BareNakedIslam says
Will add that to the list, Allan.
allanivarsson says
BNI, I have been thinking about China. If they signed the Pact, they could still deal with the Muslim invasion and at the same time have the right to send in educated Chinese into any country as a Migrant & plan technological & business takeover from within.
The Migration Pact concept is insane.
Now you know why I started two years ago in my writing attacking ‘Degree Qualifications’ which is interwoven in sections of my books with reasons why.
BareNakedIslam says
Allan, one thing about China, the UN has never been able to force them to do anything. The UN is in hysterics over the Muslim detention camps, but China just ignores them.
BP says
And there is a truly disgraceful sight right beside a main commuter rail line into Sydney – its the Gallipoli Mosque – reminding Australians of the thousands / millions of their young men killed by the Muslim Turks in WW1. How it got building consent is a moot point.
BP says
Well all of NZ lamb is Halal killed – so they’ve made a start. But its a small country and the populace can’t support millions of freeloaders. But it also has a high population of Pacific Islanders and Maoris and you don’t piss them off – they are big guys. And the ANZACS have a score to settle with Slimes after Gallipoli and WW1.
G P says
I’m terrified NZ will sign because our PM is a stupid soft-hearted dope. She and her merry band of useful idiots will push this and the ANZACs will be over.
Bloody hell I hate that bitch but the opposition has promised to revoke any joining if elected
Leonie Z Pipe says
I have my suspicions that Jacinda Ardern hasn’t even read the contract. It’s a long document and probably beyond her attention span. I haven’t read it either, except for the basics, but then I don’t have to. If I were at the helm and about to issue a death warrant on my country, I would read the document very very carefully, then say NO, let’s NOT do this”.
Jacinda’s waffly, nebulous natter at the US summit pretty much sums her up: all smiles and sweet talk and no substance.
terry Sullivan says
mad female pm in nz–the previous one was also mad and i believe she is now employed by un?
BareNakedIslam says
Is it me or does it seem like female prime ministers nearly always turn out to be bad? I’m a bit of a sexist and would not vote for a woman for president unless she was very Thatcher-like.
allanivarsson says
BNI, agreed. Except I don’t think it is being sexist.
BareNakedIslam says
Yeah, it probably is. I never liked my women teachers either after grade school.
Leonie Z Pipe says
Strange you are all commenting on this. At high school and University, I always got on much better with my male colleagues and lecturers than my female ones. As one of the minority groups (a woman studying physics), I seemed to go against the grain by not supporting my own gender group. I also prefer male doctors and dentists. All of these preferences have arisen through personal experience.
As for Helen Clark, I detested her from the outset, and even more so when I learned she had diverted part of our taxes into Palestinian “humanitarian aid”. As a Jew and staunch Israel supporter, I was outraged by this.
BareNakedIslam says
LZP, Until now, I thought you were a male. Then again, when I first started this blog, everyone thought I was a male, too.
A Minion says
Alan I think we have traitors all over who want to sign Eurpe’s death sentence..
How on Earth has it ever got this mad ???
allanivarsson says
A Minion, I made a similar comment to my wife recently. The world’s thinking has gone mad. Anti-Freedom Socialism since 1920 when it created ‘Political Correctness’ in Europe has brain-wrecked naïve do-gooder people.
I blame Psychology for infiltration of Politics, Education, Law & Order & Business selling its soft excuse system ideas. Psychology has weakened society encouraging the elimination of codes of honour, even Chivalry is now vanishing. Courage is vanishing being replaced by greed for money & pleasure.
And now Psychology is becoming Socialist Psychology & Muslim Psychology. How does anti-freedom belief systems become compatible with Psychology that was supposed to be open minded and objective?
Use a Shrink no way! Time to put Psychology out of business. Even the United Nations has been infiltrated by Psychology.
Leonie Z Pipe says
They will use us as a back door to Australia, as well as flooding our tiny country with illegals. Thanks but no thanks for destroying NZ and our closest ally, Adern. Most of us didn’t vote for you anyway.
Standing strong for New Zealand and Australia.
allanivarsson says
Leonie Z Pipe, well said, exactly right.
Hartmut says
I am not aware that China has any stakes in this suicidal compact.
According to some information and links I shared here the German administration of Merkel is a major driving force behind this in an attempt to not only legalize her criminal actions in retrospective but also go full speed ahead with the destabilization of Germany and Europe. Her wet dream is a reloaded Easter block totalitarian commie regime under which disobedient indigenous citizens are confronted in the streets (by misfitting migrants, that is) daily and thus easily kept in check – and down the road marginalized by out- and interbreeding.
BareNakedIslam says
China actually does not need to do anything. Considering they allegedly have 1 million Muslims detained in re-education camps, with China working to inhibit the practice of Islam wherever they can, I doubt many muslims would want to migrate to there.
allanivarsson says
BNI agreed that is why I am concerned that China might sign to give them an invasion take over advantage.
peter thompson says
these migrants will only want to come to the west anyway…….other 3rd world countries do not pay welfare..