Peaceful protester arrested in Toronto for dressing up like an imam and mocking Islam.
BLOGWRATH It was only two weeks ago when the Supreme Court of Canada declared the criticism of homosexuality to be a hate crime. It seems that in Torontom, Islam is also under the same high protection. Today, at a protest somebody was arrested for mocking Islam.
As I wrote earlier, a protest event was scheduled for March 20 at the offices of the Liberal Party of Ontario. It was caused by the fact that the Minister of Labour of our ruling party, Yasir Naqvi, endorsed an Islamic book, which (in accordance with the Koran) recommended wife beating as a tool for solving family problems. Despite the public outrage, the Liberals chose to ignore the issue and turn a blind eye on Muslim misogyny.
The protest attracted a tiny group of participants carrying signs like:
“Beat wife only for honour & discipline, Holy Koran 4:34”
“Those that deny Islam will be killed, Holy Koran 33:16”
“Expose jihad with free speech or die”
John Newton says
This ass kissing of Islam by Canada’s police state government will no doubt have a very negative affect on our grandchildrens futures. Sharia Law is now being operated in Britain, and it won’t be long until it’s operating in Canada. I don’t want my granddaughters vagina mutilated to appease a child sex offender named Allah, nor do I want them forced to wear Burkas, nor do I want to see Jews and gays hung by the neck as required by the Quran. This pandering to radical Islam to secure votes for political parties must stop before it’s too late, like it is for all European countries. See Youtube video: JUSTIN TRUDEAU PANDERS TO RADICAL ISLAM.
That video will provide evidence that politicians are kissing Islamic ass until their lips bleed.
Uncle says
BNI your words are so true. A very severe bridle is actually a good thing in the right hands because of the notion of control if needed and consequently SAFETY.
Hinged handcuffs are the best because if the prisoners hands are positioned palms facing outward (with the cuffs applied tightly enough so that the orientation of the hands cannot change) and the keyholes are facing away from the hands, it is impossible for the prisoner to free himself even if he had the key in his hands.
My wife and her co-workers had actually had prisoners pick the locks of chain link cuffs with a hidden paper clip, resulting in a very dangerous situation.
One night my wife told me it took her and three other officers to subdue a very strong and belligerent suspect. She was very professional and always handcuffed prisoners the proper way as explained above.
Uncle says
I over looked mentioning that the policewoman made sure her prisoner was handcuffed BEFORE reaching for the man’s wallet. My wife always made sure handcuffing was done BEFORE anything else.
The policewoman in this account is a dhimmi but apparently very competent and professional in her work.
defcon 4 says
The nazis and their tools in the French, Belgium and German police forces were also very “competent and professional”.
BareNakedIslam says
Uncle, but the question remains, why did they have to handcuff him? He wasn’t violent, he wasn’t resisting, he should not have been arrested for speaking on the street. I can’t say it never happens in the US now that the muslim is in office. But a New Jersey transit authority employee who was attending an event at Ground Zero in Manhattan on 9/11 was arrested for burning pages of a quran in the street. Gov, Chris Christie (muslim sympathizer and Ground Zero mosque supporter) said he deserved it.
He was fired from his job but reinstated after, believe it or not, the left wing ACLU helped him:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2011/04/23/shocker-new-jersey-transit-worker-fired-for-burning-a-quran-at-ground-zero-last-911-is-rehired-thanks-to-the-aclu-yes-the-aclu/
Uncle says
Most people would not notice but the policewoman handcuffed the man as if he were dangerous. Hands tightly cuffed behind the back with PALMS FACING OUTWARD was the most secure way the man could be restrained with the handcuffs she had. If the policewoman had HINGED handcuffs instead of the chain link cuffs used the man would been restrained in the most secure (and uncomfotable) way possible. The policewoman may be a dhimmi but she is a real professional. The only likely reason hinged cuffs were not available was because they cost more.
In the same way most onlookers would not notice the hancuff design and hand orientation, they would not notce the difference between a horse bridled with a snaffle bit in contrast with a horse bridled with a curb bit.
Hinged handcuffs are to chain link handcuffs what a curb bit is to a snaffle bit.
BareNakedIslam says
Uncle, I know the difference.
Uncle says
Bonni,
I did not have you mind. I would NEVER talk down to you. I was commenting for readers in general. It is just that people not involved with law enforcement or horses would not generally notice such nuances.
I was not aware of different handcuff designs until I bought my former wife a pair of hinged handcuffs for a graduation from police academy gift.
Also I was clueless about different bridles until a woman I took to a horse show pointed out to me a horse that was very cruelly treated with a very severe bridle. My friend’s blood was boiling!
I was attempting to add insight to the narrative that the policewoman did not gently handcuff the man because of required procedure. She treated him harshly in a way that many casual observers would overlook.
BareNakedIslam says
I didn’t know about the handcuffs difference either.
But the thing about bridles is not the severity so much as the hands using them. I can use a very severe bridle on a strong horse and it will not hurt him. But a novice using a very mild snaffle bridle who doesn’t know what he’s doing can annoy the horse to no end.
Defcon 4 says
The police officer is enforcing sharia law. There’s no other way to put it. To put any other spin on this story is obfuscation.
Bert says
if hussein gets his way, expect similar arrests to start happening here.
cat says
Canada do not allow the muslims or your government to ever lose or to take away your rights to freedom of speech. To lose your freedom of speech is to lose your democracy because democracy depends on freedom of speech as it’s life blood.
Susan K says
Welcome to Toronto, the city with two police forces, one for muslims and another for the rest. I’ll contact Ron and find out what the charges are.
BareNakedIslam says
Thanks, Susan.
Peter Peterson says
Wh is the person that arrested him ? we need to make a complaint to the police , anyobody knows the name of that police officer ?
hardiharhar says
They should sue for false arrest immediately.
dragonfFIRE01 says
Truth for some is an uncomfortable thing.
cheryl s. says
Can anyone answer this question for me?
If a group of muslims were on a Canadian city street and mocked Judaism or Christianity, would the muslims have been arrested?
Blog Wrath (@BlogWrath) says
I will try to answer. Most Muslims (especially the fanatical) are very dull people, who totally lack any sense of humour. Mockery and satire are alien to them. When they organize a similar protest event, they don’t mock – they yell, shout, threaten and carry placards blaming Mossad, Israel and the Zionists for everything. I have never seen or even heard about a Muslim arrested under similar circumstances in Canada.
Last September I covered a large Muslim demonstration in Toronto against that YouTube movie. Israel was called “fascist state” and many speakers and participants wanted the introduction of blasphemy laws. Some of them even wanted the makers of the movie to be put to death. Not a single Muslim was arrested.
In contrast – two weeks ago there was a peaceful demonstration at an abortion clinic in Ottawa (I am not sure how that works in the USA, but in Canada anti-abortionists are very quiet people). The police saw that one of the participants had a camera, they seized it, erased all the pictures and gave it back to him. I wonder – is such police action possible in the USA?
Guy Macher says
Some lawyer in Toronto must take this case! Come on, not all of you are shysters, provide pro bono help for this man!
Linda Rivera says
Horrifying. Canada was once a FREE country! No longer! To criticize Islam and to criticize Islamic wife beating is now against the law? And you will be arrested and handcuffed for doing that? Disgusting.
Canadian ruling elites’ RABID HATE for women is certainly going to frighten defenseless, Muslim women who are violently beaten by their husbands from calling the police for help. Are the police going to inform the women that wife beating is part of Islam and by asking for police help they are GUILTY of criticizing Islam and that they will be showing up to arrest the Muslim women for criticizing Islam?
Can the Canadian authorities please answer this question? Muslim women need to know if they will be arrested for begging police for help from their VIOLENT, abusive Muslim husbands.
eric says
And I just got out of jail after five months. My first bail was denied. I got high court bail. The judge who denied at low court said ” Mr Brazau is a danger to society because his actions could instill retaliatory violence” O so lets lock up the girls so the boys do not get out of hand. Better yet cover them with a black cloth sack
logdon says
It needs a thousand all dressed in the imam and burqa outfits to descend on police HQ and to ask for all to be arrested for the crime of free speech.
Video the whole shebang and create a bit of verbal ruction with the inevitable muslims hurling their abuse and violence and post it on You Tube and sites such as BNI.
Then as in blue touch paper style sit and wait.
It won’t take long.
Lenin-McCarthy says
I am ashamed and embarrassed to be Canadian.
Mobuttlicker says
The provinnce of Ontario is an embarrassment to Canada.
The Ontario police department should be sued to the fullest extent!!
I am contacting the office of the Prime Minister.
perceptor1 says
TRUTH IS NO DEFENSE!!!
Sharia law forbids telling something TRUE.
Backbiting in Published Works
Backbiting also includes the author of a book mentioning a specific person in his work by saying, “so-and-so says such and such,” which is unlawful if he thereby intends to demean him. But if he wants to clarify the person’s mistake so that others will not follow him, or expose the weakness of his scholarship so others will not be deceived and accept what he says, it is not backbiting, but rather advice that is obligatory, and is rewarded by Allah for the person who intends it as such.
Nor is it backbiting for a writer or other person to say – “there are those” or “a certain group” who say such and such, which is a mistake, error, ignorance, and folly,” and so forth, which is not backbiting because backbiting entails mentioning a particular person or a group of specific individuals.
Backbiting by Allusion and Innuendo
When the person being spoken to understands whom one is referring to, it is backbiting and Unlawful to say, for example – “a certain person did such and such” – or – “a certain scholar” – or – “someone with pretensions to knowledge” – or – “a certain Mufti / certain person regarded as good” – or – “someone who claims to be an ascetic” – or – “one of those who passed by us today” – or – “one of the people we saw.”
This includes the backbiting of some would-be scholars and devotees, who make backbiting innuendoes that are as clearly understood as if they were plainly stated. When one of them is asked, for example, how so-and-so is, he replies, “May Allah improve us,” – or – “May Allah forgive us,” – or – “May Allah improve him,” – or – “We ask Allah’s forbearance,” – or – “Praise be to Allah who has not afflicted us with visiting oppressors,” – or – “We take refuge in Allah from evil,” – or – “May Allah forgive us for lack of modesty,” – or – “May Allah relent towards us,” and the like, from which the listener understands the person’s shortcomings. All of this is backbiting and is unlawful, just as when one says – “So-and-so is afflicted with what we all are,” – or – “There’s no way he can manage this,” – or – “We all do it.”
Bonnie says
And yet, people dress up like priests and nuns for costume parties all the time. But of course that would be Christian and open to defamation and derision. Our Canadian police have become apologists for islam (I don’t capitalize because that would give credence to this vile cult) just as they have for natives who break the law. We have no freedom of speech anymore. Sad!
mbiajc says
Bonnie: I pray the Canadian government and the American government will wake up before it’s too late.
BareNakedIslam says
mb, they won’t without all of us insisting on it and speaking out whenever we can. It’s important to keep bothering your elected officials with stories about CAIR and Muslim infiltration.
ADHD says
Amen!!!!
When did Canada abandon its right to free expression to the Moslem infiltrators? When two-three weeks ago her Supreme Court said that even the truth can be hate speech when one’s confronting Communist sodomite-activists, no matter how correct it really is!!!!
Most or all of the Western courts need to be purged the same way as Western governments (both politicians and civil-servants), banking, law-firms, unions, academe, &c.
Joan says
To be fair, this case has not been heard by Canada’s Supreme Court and if it gets that far before the accused are acquitted in a lower court or dismissed by the Crown to avoid media criticism, I will bet our SCC will find in favour of the accused. Maybe a few years ago, it would have been different but not now. People are waking up and while municipal police directed by councillors dependent on pro-shRi’ah funding may be among the last to realize it, incidents like this one help to clarify and to strengthen our Constitutional right to free expression a d to firm up legislation to better protect those rights. For instance, legislation was recently passed to better protect witnesses and to strengthen laws to stop the misuse of our immigration and refugee system by illegals with terrorist convictions.
mbiajc says
I personally believe that when someone uses their “rights” to spread messages of hate, and killing as all Muslims do. They shouldn’t have those rights. Because they insight violence.
reason1984 says
Sue the shiite out of them, and buy new imam wear with a potion of the settlement…two can play lawfare.
Grouchy Fogie says
As Daffy Duck used to say, “Deth-PICABLE~!”,,, and Dhimmi DoNuts don’t have the brainpower of Daffy Duck~! If it weren’t so devastating to the rights of the Canadian People, it would be outrageously, satirically hilarious~!
don siege says
is there any country in the world which is free of these muslim parasites.
this is not a rhetorical question; I would seriously consider relocating to avoid the impending disaster.
ronyvo says
I, and many of my family and friends, would like to know of such country. But, it seems that Islam is a rare kind of cancer. It spreads fast and the only medical treatment is prohibited, which is completely and entirely remove it surgically OR killing the carrier to avoid spreading.
Daniel Quinn says
Japan
BareNakedIslam says
DQ, No, that rumor about Japan having no muslims is a big internet lie.
dragonfFIRE01 says
I think it’s only Antartica
ADHD says
What of the various Polynesian islands like Tahiti, Rarotonga, Easter Island and those others? Perhaps they might have a bit of a chance. Also, the Hawaiian Islands other than Oahu (where the capital Honolulu is located), maybe the Aleutians (likely too cold), the Russo-Japanese Kuriles (also on the coldish side), Taiwan and a few others like the Falklands, South Sandwich Islands, even Canada’s Newfoundland (at a stretch – hopefully the relative poverty of that place may have helped keep it relatively free from Moslem infestation).
defcon 4 says
Taiwan already has a huge mosque that has some connections to islamofascist Turkey. I think a mosque has even be dragged out to near the Arctic Circle!
ADHD says
With virtually no exposed soil at all, one can’t really hope to grow or sustain any life upon Antarctica whatsoever. It HAS TO BE islands like the Falklands, South Sandwich, South Shetlands and whatever is still available…
ADHD says
Oh yes, not to forget some Canadian enclaves that are located in the Canadian Shield (on a small scale – places like Hearst, Hornepayne, Geraldton, &c.) as well as those gradually gaining a longer growing season in the forest belts in Northern Ontario, Québec, the Prairies – provided that it’s WELL AWAY from any sort of substantial human habitation. Even that’s NO guarantee: Moslems have been caught in places like Cold Lake, Alberta; Inuvik, NWT. However, with those being in relatively small numbers – and perhaps with natives’ (First Nations) help – it may be the next best thing to it; particularly if it comes to war.
The places to avoid the most of all are the urban centres – and the larger the worse!!! Obviously, Toronto, Calgary, Vancouver, Montréal et al must be shunned most of all by a minimum of not less than 100 km. (62 miles).
JerryJ26 says
Borneo, Greenland, Iceland
Odium says
Let me know too please