Quebec’s Bill 62 is intended to ban face-covering Islamic headgear (niqabs, burqas, chadors). The bill, which forces women to uncover their faces whenever they provide or receive public services, is not sitting well with Muslim women whom it targets, and promises to expose them to discrimination, public humiliation, and ridicule. (And rightly so. When in Rome…)
CTV News One of those women is Warda Naili. Raised Catholic, she converted to Islam and wears a niqab by choice. “That means I will be a prisoner. I will be a prisoner in my own house,” she said, adding that she doesn’t feel comfortable showing her face unless it’s to another woman. (So stay home. Your Islamic supremacist headgear scares little children and offends everyone else)
“If I’m at the hospital in the waiting room, I cannot take off my veil. It’s impossible. I would be ashamed.” (Converts to Islam are always the most extremist in their views in order to prove their “worthiness” of being a Muslim. That’s also why so many Muslim terrorists are recent converts)
Shaheen Ashraf of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women called the bill discriminatory and is questioning the motives behind it. (Motives? How about the same motive that forbids people in face masks from entering banks, schools, and other public places?)
Ashraf says it’s distressing that the issue keeps coming up. “If it’s not the niqab, it’s the hijab, if it’s not the hijab, it’s the burqa, if it’s not the burqa it’s the chador, so I feel that every few days this stir-up must mean something,” she said. (Well, duh)
Ashraf said the bill clearly targets Muslim women and will lead to their further marginalization in Quebec society (Maybe that’s the idea).
“So what does it mean now? Niqab police as bus drivers? What are we going to do in libraries? And refuse to provide them with services? If a woman is freezing with children, say no? (YES!)
Warda Naili says, “I think of all the people who don’t like Islam, don’t like Muslims, and think I’m an extremist and they will be happy with this law and will be comfortable with this idea of hating me. They will think they were right in thinking this way,” she said. (They were!)
Globe and Mail Quebec’s Bill 62 forcing Muslim women to uncover their faces to give or receive services, passed by the Quebec National Assembly, is thought to be a direct attack on religious freedom (Security trumps religious freedom every time).
Bill 62 demands that women wearing face-coverings remove those coverings for “as long as the service is being rendered,” according to Justice Minister Stéphanie Vallée.
The law’s wording appears to mean that a woman wearing a face-covering headbag will be asked to remove it before she can board a municipal bus, or while she is in line at a government office, or in a school, or waiting in a hospital emergency room.
The controversial legislation would effectively ban public workers — including doctors, nurses, teachers and daycare workers — as well as those receiving a service from the government, from wearing the niqab, burka or any other face covering.
Bill 62 is the festering afterbirth of ugly politics – a law designed to immunize the Liberal government of Premier Philippe Couillard from opposition charges that it isn’t doing enough to force Quebec’s secular beliefs on immigrants, specifically Muslims. (Hey, there are planes leaving everyday to return them to the sharia-ruled hellhole of their choice)
Veiled Muslim women could find themselves subjected to verbal attacks by vigilantes who demand they remove their face-coverings the minute they sit down on a bus seat. Or they could be humiliated by being ordered to remove their covering in order to enter a government building. (Isn’t that great? Citizens will help enforce the law)
“As long as the service is being rendered, the face should be uncovered,” Quebec Justice Minister Stéphanie Vallée said. The bill, Vallée said, does not specifically target religious symbols. The law would also apply, for instance, to masked protesters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdDrizl3FT8
h/t Vlad Tepesblog
So….. Muslim religion does not allow women’s skin to be shown…but it allows Muslim men to “force marry and have sex” to a child as young as 9 ???
Every putrid, pitiful, female muzslime is already “trapped” no matter where they are. Izslime is a trap, that eats its prey.
So, a Muslim woman who cannot wear niqab outside feels like a prisoner in her own home because she fears going out without her face veil? Well she could always move to Saudi Arabia where she CAN go outside with her niqab and STILL be a prisoner in her own home.
Oddly enough Quebec bill 62 appears to satisfy requirements of cultural Marxist EU which Trudeau loves.
WOW! Imagine being in a hospital after surgery, or for treatment, and waking up (while drugged) and seeing a headbagged nurse. THAT could contribute to heart attacks, nightmares, and slower recovery.
This objection of theirs contradicts and disproves right away the other one that Muslim women come up with: that the head cover is a free choice, even though sometimes it really is.
Their doublegame is showy.
Our answer is simple and should be:
1) if you Muslim lady are really free to opt out and not wear that, well then do not wear it because it is against the laws of the land you (chose to) live in, based on security and interaction reasons
2) if you are not so free to opt out, well then we force you not to wear it so that you can unload on our laws the responsability of it and if you’ll still get harassed or punished, we can single out and punish in the process those who harrass or punish you for abiding the law. That is because no alien rules may supersede and override our law and those who push for it are to be warned then arrested and possibly deported.
In all cases banning it is the right way to go. ..
AGREE 1000% NEXT ONE BAN ALL LIBERALS FROM SPEAKING IN PUBLIC OR WOMEN FROM VOTING FOR NICE HAIR NO BRAIN GUYS
Giovanni: There is no Muslim lady, just Muslim woman.
“Waaah! We can’t cover our face because you hate us!” Yes, we do hate Muslums, but that’s not why face veils need to be banned. IT’S FOR OUR SAFETY! Muslums don’t want us to be safe, of course.
Muslum women don’t just veil from the men, they also veil for the non Muslum women!
“I will be a prisoner in my home if I have to uncover my face in public”
Fine, then stay home, nobody will miss you.
If she doesn’t like the LAW as it is, she is free to move to another Province, OR better yet, SELF-DEPORT from Canada !
“I can’t take off my veil, I would be ashamed…”
Well, we can all understand that; she’s so butt-ugly she doesn’t dare show her ‘lovely’ physiognomy to the world!
Ma’am, you have no need to worry, most folks will not call you ugly to your face anymore.
Everybody is happy except them.
Great news, pray it starts a Permanent practice in North America. For those female moslem supremacists who don’t want public services from the infidel,stay the hell home and count your chromosomes from being an inbred abberation in a western society.
headbags offend me,period.!!! And I’m inwardly sensitive, like a Russian Boar !!!!
How in the heck do you spend a life time never seeing a moslem in a headbag, and after 9-11 ,always seeing them ???
Face coverings are a personal choice oe forced on the win by jer husband. I challenge ant muslim to show me where in the Quran it says the face covering is a religious edict.
The husband doesn’t want the public to see her oral sex organ …
Of course, you can always return to your homeland where you can hide yourself as you see fit.
Thats rich muzrats forbid anyone else from having religious freedom yet illegally invade then expect it for themselves. Fook them
Ultimately, war will be here in order to remove the growing mozlim threat.
AGREE 1000% FREE BULLETS FOR LIBTURDS
1st: No One Is Forced To Apply Or For Government Services.
2d: Islam mandates compulsory Charity, If that money did not go to Jihad, they would not need Canadian Services.
3d. But since the goal is to bankrupt the Infidel governments; they must use Infidel tax revenues.
Less Integration????????????
How much Integration when one cannot see the face of whom you are conversing with.?
You already are a prisoner according to sharia law & Koran: a woman cannot leave her home without permission from husband and cannot leave w/o a male family escort. To all Muslims: not happy with a nations laws than go back to your home nation.
Nickies, Burkies and Chafies …. facial cuffs …. for dirty, rotten Muslim whores ?
Those poor Muslim women! I feel bad that they’re going to have to show their faces! It’s messed up!
But hey I got an idea. Maybe they could move back to the Jizzlamic hellhole of their choice. Great idea!
Once there they might be lucky enough to get a nice little acid splash that will permanently disfigure their face. Then they’ll have to wear a bag over their head. Oh wait – they already do…
That poor dear, how did she ever survive walking around with her face uncovered before she converted to Islame?
They would dress like everybody and nobody would even notice they are muslim.
Should have stuck with Catholicism, which for all its historical faults, has meant a better deal for women because of the esteem in which Christ’s mother was held.
Western women were wimpled to show deference to men and this only continues with the Amish, Hutterites, Open Brethren etc. or women having an audience with pope commie. That evil viper has imperiled Judeo Christian women and I’m surprised one of his muslum pets hasn’t shown him the error of his ways yet.
“Let your wives be veiled.” is about recognition & annoyance. 33.59 results from Bukhari 1.4.148.
http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/004.html#001.004.148
Read it! Share it! Openly declare it!
Volume 1, Book 4, Number 148:
Narrated ‘Aisha:
The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. ‘Umar used to say to the Prophet “Let your wives be veiled,” but Allah’s Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam’a the wife of the Prophet went out at ‘Isha’ time and she was a tall lady. ‘Umar addressed her and said, “I have recognized you, O Sauda.” He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of “Al-Hijab” (A complete body cover excluding the eyes).
Allah revealed a verse written 50,000 years before the creation ‘cuz Umar watched Sauda take a crap. Yeah, right. Umar was watching women shitting while he shudda been raising his arse to Allah. That informs us about his priorities.
Yeah we know. We are fast becoming prisoners in our own countries – if we continue to tolerate savages like smelly you stabbing, lying, cheating, stealing, molesting, enslaving, prostituting and making pornographic threats on life in general. Not to forget of course the blow jobs on our buildings and anything civilized. As long as we see your hairy face we can read your behind. No more Koran. No more mosques. No more passports and special licence to your blood thirsty fifth columns. Muslims have shown themselves to be something be kept at a distance – for obvious reasons. For those who refuse to see I imagine they will see soon enough.