According to Fawstin…, Facebook just notified me that I’m suspended for thirty days for an unidentified post of mine from last year, but I’m still able to post for whatever reason. But if you’re Muslim and you threaten to rape and murder me on their platform, Facebook will allow it with impunity.
In the summer/fall of 2018, I got thousands of death threats on every platform that I haven’t yet been banned from, when I was announced as the judge for another Mohammad cartoon contest (which was unfortunately cancelled).
After Facebook and Instagram never responded to my reports of the death threats, (I was banned on Twitter by that point for criticizing Marvel’s Islamic propaganda comic book for ignoring the ONLY reason we discuss Islam, which is jihad) I asked friends if they could help me report the threats, and a good number of them did.
But there are still people who pretend that those of us who are routinely punished by socialist media for countering their pro-Islam/leftist agenda, somehow deserve to be punished, because we’ve allegedly gone against their so-called “community standards”.
Well, the screenshots in the following pages (before I get into the actual “peaceful death threats” and the sixty new Mohammad cartoons by me that they inspired) should make even Facebook’s biggest apologists lift an eyebrow, at the least.
Facebook chooses not to ban Muslims who’ve threatened to rape and murder me on their platform because they “found that it doesn’t go against any of our community standards.” I repeat: Facebook, over and over again, responded to reports of the death threats against me as Not going against ANY of their “community standards”.
And they have the gall to add that “We keep our review process as fair as possible” and that they “understand” that I may not “like it”. I sure as hell don’t like it. And for those who would tell me, “What do you expect?” Go to hell. I expect better from those living in a civilized society.
The least Facebook could do is have a Zero Tolerance policy against those who threaten the lives of their users, no matter who they are, no matter how “racist” and “islamophobic” they’ll be accused of being.
If removing the accounts of Muslims who threaten people on socialist media makes one an “Islamophobe”, then maybe it might make the fools who fall for that smear realize that it’s a term that’s been made up by an enemy at war with us, in order to keep us in check.
This is Unacceptable, and were there any legitimate news organizations left, ones that were run by actual journalists who were objective, this would be a major story.
But it goes unreported, and these platforms get away with helping endanger the lives of others by not banning the accounts of savages.
-Bosch Fawstin, November, 2020
You can order my new book, Peaceful Death Threats Vol. 2, at my store here.
Hartmut says
Public slaughter is next – as again in France yesterday where 2 men were killed.
https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article220145304/Cholet-Angreifer-toetet-zwei-Menschen-in-Frankreich.html
BareNakedIslam says
Hart, can you summarize the article?
allanivarsson says
Something to think about, also with a trail of links…
https://allanivarsson.com/2020/05/01/cosmic-law-on-death-threats/
Linda Rivera says
I’m absolutely mystified. There is absolutely nothing about the cartoons shown here that are offensive. They are TRUTHFUL. I would have thought Muslims would be very happy with these cartoons???
This is truly puzzling.
Bikinis not Burkas says
Not totally truthful!
The perfect man, NOT, defective DNA.
Muhammad was WHITE!
http://quranx.com/Hadith/Muslim/Reference/Hadith-2340/
Az gal says
Linda, what makes the Muslums go ballistic is the fact Mohammed was drawn. It is forbidden to picture him.
Linda Rivera says
Facebook chooses not to ban Muslims who’ve threatened to rape and murder me on their platform because they “found that it doesn’t go against any of our community standards.”
END of ARTICLE QUOTE
ABSOLUTELY TERRIFYING — Facebook literally and officially declare that they agree with non Muslims being RAPED and MURDERED by Muslims.
This is what has become of America and the Free World.
Az gal says
Unbelievable. The Republicans need to take on this issue. Mr Fawstin is very brave & I appreciate his efforts & sacrifices.
blackadder48 says
We speaks words, we draw cartoons, muslims use knifes, swords, guns and bombs against us and yet THEY are called the religion of peace.
The word islam means submission and NOT peace, and islam has never, in the last 1400 years at least, ever been known as a religion of peace as it is a religion of conquest.
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
If Mark Zuckerberg thinks death threats are okay, I think he should get the death penalty.
Do they have the death penalty for treason in America? If so, why hasn’t it been used on him yet? Americans voted for Trump because they reject ISISlam. These silicon valley freaks love barbarism so much, clearly they are in love with terrorists. We should give them barbarism.
I hope I’m “allowed” to say that.
BareNakedIslam says
Yes, some states have the death penalty. But he would have to be tried for treason first.
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
If you’re gonna delete the “controversial” part of my post, delete the part where I asked if I’m “allowed” to say that… unless you’re trying to make me look like a wimp…
jesus christ.
allanivarsson says
Rob R, we cannot sentence people to death, because they censor speech on their social media communication tool. Whether we agree with their decision or not it is their right to decide. We have the right to criticise and reject their thinking that is all. We have the right to boycott use of their social media site that is all.
Every website has the right to censor comments to stop things said from being published on the site that is not appropriate speech. Newspapers and magazines before the age of the Internet have been doing this for over a century, selectively choosing the quotes they publish and trashing the rest. It’s called ‘Freedom of Choice’ in a world of ‘Freedom of Speech’. What do we do? Sentence every person to death because we don’t like their censorship decision?
Government Censorship of ‘Free Speech’ is not acceptable and is an oppressive totalitarian action. Example, Communism, Fascism, Islam, Socialism, Blasphemy Law, Sharia Law and all other forms of legislated anti-freedom of speech laws are crossing over into complete control of ‘Freedom of Speech’.
But individual choices of what people selectively accept is their business not ours.
‘Freedom of Speech’ gives us the right to criticise and reject an idea that is all.
Thousands of people would be executed true to the past history mentality of Communism, Blasphemy Law and Sharia Law if we made it a criminal offence to stop personal censoring of ideas. We all censor out of our belief system things we do not like. It is called ‘Freedom of Choice’.
As for Zuckerberg, he is not making all of the censorship decisions. They are made by ‘Social Engineers’ that are hired by other managers. These appointment seats come and go. And we don’t know the belief system of these people. They could be Socialist, Communist, Muslim or some do-gooder mentality that has no sense of reality. The same problem applies to YouTube, PayPal, Twitter and many other Social Media tools.
I tried to buy that cartoon book to check it out, but I will not use PayPal, never have, never will. There was no direct tool for use of credit card. So I backed out.
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
“Rob R, we cannot sentence people to death, because they censor speech on their social media communication tool. ”
Yes we can. It’s called having the balls to do it. That’s all there is to it. Trump unfortunately (and no-one else in the GOP either) did not have the balls to do it. If the courts overturn this farce of an election and give him his second term, he needs to use it wisely and actually take his opportunities this time. I’m not interested in reading your mealy mouthed, worthless, Neville-Chamblerain-style wittering essay.
Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg love the religion of death. They want to brainwash people in America. They and other unhinged leftists have already spent YEARS training and brainwashing people of all ages (but most alarmingly, young impressionable people) to have an absurd, unhealthy respect for a vile nasty disgusting violent religion. They have been training them to think that you are never allowed to criticise someone if hey are a Muslim.
And even more crucially, AS ESTABLISHED IN THIS ARTICLE, they allow Jihadi death threats to go through completely uncensored. They are pro-Jihad, pro-ISIS. Jack Dorsey sports a Bin-Laden-style beard. His intentions and allegiances are clear. They allow the trafficking of threats of violence from Jihadi scumlords. THEY USE THEIR SYSTEM TO AID AND ABET JIHD.
That cannot be allowed to go on any longer.
The only way to respond to fascists like Dorsey and Zuckerberg is with force. Winston Churchill showed us that you cannot be “nice” and “civil” with fascists and just hope they go away. That did not work, it just made it worse and it just gave Hitler more time to get stronger..
Dorsey and Zuckerberg are Islamofascist fantasists, and they need to be thrown on death row for their utterly heinous crimes. They have used their power and influence to try and kill the country that made them rich in the first place. The penalty for murder in California (where they both live and made all their money) is death.
allanivarsson says
Rob R. I have always refused to deal with Twitter since 2011 when they asked me to join.
I used Facebook only connected to family & close friends, I refuse to use public.
Dorsey & Zuckerberg are Philanthropists, they are very intelligent. They are not low intelligence Chamberlain mentality.
You have no evidence that they use their social media to support ISIS & are pro-Jihad. This idea is an invention in your own thinking. If they were truly supporting such ideas, Intelligence Organisations would be hunting them.
They are not Islamofascists. I don’t agree with some of their censorship, but they own their social media sites, they can close them down, anytime they choose to. People can boycott use of their site anytime they want.
I am more concerned with the danger of Communism & Islam than I am about Dorsey & Zuckerberg. It is easy to boycott their sites if you don’t like their creation.
You are pushing an idea that will never happen. And the idea is wrong.
There are a lot of men a lot tougher than you. I am now 72 years, I have lived a very tough dynamic life, including with intense pain since 1975 at the age of 26 years.
I have fought street fights in my young years and never lost even when I faced two. I have stood up against four, five and six and they all backed down. I have taken out four of my bosses in the executive world, including a Manufacturing Manager, General Manager and an Industrial Engineer. I have been called the ‘Tiger’, ‘Grim Reaper’, ‘The Terminator’ because I gave no quarter to incompetence. I became a Consultant because I delivered constantly, Class ‘A’ World Class Results in Manufacturing.
Using 19th Century methods, for several years in my 50’s & 60’s, I cut through dense Australia bush that animals cannot walk through, using an axe, handsaw, and mattock, clearing land, no chainsaws, no tractors. The work all done on a bad left leg in pain 24/7. I have no time for whingers.
Don’t talk about balls to do it… what is your history?