In India, Hindu celebrations are being attacked by Muslims while bleeding-heat ‘secular-liberals’ and the media jump in to whitewash the violence, reiterating the myth that “Islam is a religion of peace.” Not so long ago, a young boy named Rupesh Pandey was lynched by a Muslim mob when a Saraswati Puja Visarjan was attacked in Jharkhand’s Hazaribagh.
OpIndia (A proud Kafir) Durga Puja pandals and Visarjan processions have been attacked multiple times in various Indian states.
On the day of Hanuman Jayanti, Delhi’s Jahangirpuri became a scene of brutal violence. Relentless stone-pelting, arson, and even firing at the Hindus taking the procession or Shobha Yatra on the occasion of Hanuman Jayanti by the local Muslim residents sparked communal tensions in the area.
Caught on Camera: Rioter caught firing from a gun during rioting and attack on the #HanumanJayanti procession in #Jahangirpuri of New Delhi. pic.twitter.com/obuKqrEwla
— Aditya Raj Kaul (@AdityaRajKaul) April 17, 2022
Even worse, soon after the Jahangirpuri violence, certain ‘secular-liberals’ came out with a claim that the violence was sparked because the Hindu devotees had tried to enter a mosque to hoist a saffron flag. This attempt at blaming Hindus for the violence was expected, because, less than a week back, the blame for similar stone-pelting attacks on Ram Navami processions in multiple states was put on the Hindus too, saying that they had played ‘provocative songs’.
The blames and excuses are aplenty. “Hindus were using provocative songs, they should not have used ‘provocative slogans’, they should not have taken their procession through Muslim areas, they should not carry saffron flags”, etc etc.
In the Jahangirpuri violence, there were videos of Muslims pelting stones at Hindus going around on social media. So the ‘secular-liberals’ came up with some crafty claims. They said the Hindu mob tried to forcefully enter a mosque to hoist a saffron flag. So, the victim card and the blame card were out. It was the Hindus’ fault again that some Muslims just had to resort to pelting stones.
https://youtu.be/GdWfKm69nxY
However, Delhi Police soon punctured holes into those claims. Police stated that no attempts were made to hoist the saffron flag in a mosque during the Jahangirpuri Hanuman Jayanti procession.
The thing is, the recent spate of violence is neither unique nor confined. In Karauli, the Muslim mob had pelted stones and attacked a Hindu procession during the Hindu New Year celebrations. Days later, Ram Navami Shobha Yatras saw multiple attacks in Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, West Bengal, Gujarat, Odisha
Soon after the Jahangirpuri violence, certain ‘secular-liberals’ came out with a claim that the violence was sparked because the Hindu devotees had tried to enter a mosque to hoist a saffron flag. This attempt at blaming Hindus for the violence was expected, because, less than a week back, the blame for similar stone-pelting attacks on Ram Navami processions in multiple states was put on the Hindus too, saying that they had played ‘provocative songs’.
he blames and excuses are aplenty. “Hindus were using provocative songs, they should not have used ‘provocative slogans’, they should not have taken their procession through Muslim areas, they should not carry saffron flags”, etc etc.
In the Jahangirpuri violence, there were videos of Muslims pelting stones at Hindus going around on social media. So the ‘secular-liberals’ came up with some crafty claims. They said the Hindu mob tried to forcefully enter a mosque to hoist a saffron flag. So, the victim card and the blame card were out. It was the Hindus’ fault again that some Muslims just had to resort to pelting stones.
However, Delhi Police soon punctured holes into those claims. Police stated that no attempts were made to hoist the saffron flag in a mosque during the Jahangirpuri Hanuman Jayanti procession.
The thing is, the recent spate of violence is neither unique nor confined. In Karauli, the Muslim mob had pelted stones and attacked a Hindu procession during the Hindu New Year celebrations. Days later, Ram Navami Shobha Yatras saw multiple attacks in Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, West Bengal, Gujarat, Odisha etc.
This is just the list of attacks in April 2022. A simple Google search will tell you that Hindu festivities and processions or ‘Sobha Yatras’ which are a part of the traditional celebrations have been attacked by Islamists for a very long time. Such incidents have been happening in many states, across many areas for decades.
‘Muslim NO GO areas’ and other such claims of ‘secular liberals’
‘Secular liberals’ seem to assert that the very act of taking a Hindu procession through these so-called ‘Muslim areas’ is provocation enough. They don’t explicitly say that the stone-pelting should be done and the attacks are justified, but the very fact that they highlight the procession and its passage through the alleged ‘Muslim areas’ and not the fact that stones were pelted on a passing procession in a particular neighbourhood, tells you who they want to blame it on.
As per the ‘secular liberals’, these so-called ‘Muslim areas’ are actually ‘Muslims only’ areas. In reality, these are ghettos where forget Hindu festivities, even police presence and medical workers are unwelcome.
Welcome to the new normal – Muslim mobs on a rampage. This one from Hubballi, Karnataka didn’t even make the primetime news cycle.
11 cops badly injured. A Hanuman temple stoned. Reason? A photoshopped WhatsApp post showing a saffron flag on a mosque. pic.twitter.com/NayuMfCOAX
— Anand Ranganathan (@ARanganathan72) April 18, 2022
Linda Rivera says
Muslims are determined to show the world via their Murderous Hate, Extreme Violence, Cruelty. Savagery, DAILY JIHAD and CONSTANT MUSLIM TERRORIST ATTACKS that Islam is the Most Desirable and the Very Best Cult-Political ideology in the entire world.
For 1,400 horrific years to this present day, rabid Muslim God Haters have left a Trail of BLOOD and TEARS around the world.
Hundreds of millions of our precious non Muslim brothers and sisters have been barbarically slaughtered because the innocents didn’t believe in warlord Mohammad’s god of Destruction and MASS MURDER.
Muslims take DEMONIC JOY and DELIGHT in breaking the Ten Commandments that the Just Judge, the Righteous HOLY ONE, our Glorious, Majestic, Awesome Creator gave to His faithful Jewish servant, Moses, thousands of years before the MURDER BLOOD CONQUEST Cult of Islam was invented.
YOU SHALL NOT MURDER
The Bible warns, “IT IS A TERRIFYING THING TO FALL INTO THE HANDS OF THE LIVING GOD” And,
“How will we escape if we neglect so great a salvation?:
Bible, Romans 12:19
“VENGEANCE IS MINE, I WILL REPAY,” says the Lord.
Ghulam says
I.N.D.I.A = I’ll Never Do It Again
What do Indians mean by “secular liberal”? Many religious people can be quite liberal in the true sense (I’m one of the greatest example) 🙂
Just because you think you have secular beliefs doesn’t make you a liberal person.
The Ku Klux Klan in America is pretty secular as long as you’re a white person of Northern European ancestry. The Nazis of Germany were pretty secular too. As long as you weren’t Jewish, you could believe in whatever you wanted. Even Islam was an option.
France is the world’s only true Secular state. That word has been derived from old French word seculer which in turn was derived from Latin saecularis . Basically the Frenchies hate ALL religions equally including Christianity. They frown on public display of religion. All Frenchies are secular. That is why I don’t like them.
According to the French definition, Modi’s khakee wearing brownshirts would be the seculars as they’re pressing for a hijab ban in some parts of India (while conveniently making an exception for Hindu women who’re allowed to wear their dots.
Modi’s jahill brigade is not truly secular then, are they? The French seculars frown on the Cross and Bible as much as they do the hijab. The Indian seculars are just a bunch of neo-Nazis. Modi’s supporters are the modern day version of Hitler’s brownshirts. That’s the definition we can all agree on.
In any case, I’m not gonna like the word “secular”, am I?
Weird Indian English never made any sense to me. Oh now I get it, the gandu* Hindus use “secular” to describe what most Westerners would call “far left”
Modi’s illiterate khakee underpants-wearing RSS Hindus enjoy raping the English language with their neologisms. Thank you. Come again.
Ghulam says
Dear Hindus
On the occasion of your religious holidays and our amazing Ramadan, I am willing to bury the hatchet and wish you a great time.
Please send my message to your beloved Narendra Modi. I have taken the pain to write it in your national language.
हिन्दू का बच्चा, हरामी का बच्चा, सौ में सिर्फ एक सच्चा, वो भी रंडी का बच्चा
TRANSLATION: All Hindus are dear and precious to me. What would I do without you fine people? I have so much respect for your gods and goddesses.
Brother Ghulam
hmm says
Literally translated and not what you typed as translation: Hindu kids are bastards, in 100 only one is true and even he belongs to a whore. Enough said about you and your religion Ghulam.
BareNakedIslam says
I like Modi. Does that make me a Hitler brownshirt?
Ghulam says
There’s a difference between liking someone and working for them like a mindless drone. Charlie Chaplin liked Hitler’s mustache. That didn’t stop him from making a film called The Great Dictator mocking every single thing Hitler stood for.
I like the beheading videos on your blog. Does that make me Hannibal Lecter?
My problem with Modi’s brownshirts is they just do not know how to apply their minds. They’ve been zombified and cluelessly parrot every piece of propaganda. Nothing that leaves Modi’s orifice of a mouth is any better than what comes out of my rear end. They make him as some kind of statesman but he’s a ridiculous moron.
Listen to Modi’s speeches in English (or even his native languages). He can’t even pronounce the “zee” syllable yet they try to pass him off as some kind of fine orator. The only thing he can do is inspire a mob to burn things down, rape, and pillage which he has done many times. I don’t know in what universe that would be considered an example of a decent human being.
I would stop equating Modi with Hitler the day any of his supporters can openly ridicule him to his face, and get away with it. It won’t happen because their Fuhrer is very sensitive to criticism. His toadies infest various corners of the Internet trying to protect his image. That is the classic sign of a dictator.
If not at the level of Hitler, at least Modi’s not very different from Kim Jong-Un of North Korea.
BareNakedIslam says
I can’t effectively argue against you about Modi because I have not been closely following everything that goes on in India. I know I liked his ‘India First’ nationalistic positions in his campaign for PM several years ago, and current hands off policies re: anti-hijab protests, etc. But am not up to date on the daily issues there.
Then again, India has a huge Muslim population which constitutes a threat to Hundus/Sikhs there.
Jack Rider says
In using the claim of “provocation” the muslims reserve to themselves the non-existent right to not be offended by whatever event or declaration they chose, even if that event or declaration is untrue. This corrodes the democracy’s freedom and rule of law. It will eventually destroy the democracy itself. This is exactly what the muslims want because they do not see that man has unalienable rights or the right to chose his own course in life, even the pursuit of happiness. To the muslims all of society and all societies must be brought under sharia and enforced by the fatwas of imams, the champions of the closed-minded and primitively violent. Theses riots are a cautionary note to all who value democracy and the rule of law. The degeneracy of waziristan is literally only a stone’s throw away.
FaithfulServantsOfChristKJV says
The Sikhs of India have the right idea. The Khalistan movement.
The Khalistan movement is a movement to create a Sikh homeland separate from Hindus and Muslims (started during a time of hardcore anti-Sikh persecution at the hands of Hindus in India).
When the Lahore Resolution of the Muslim League demanded Punjab be made into a Muslim state, the Akalis viewed it as an attempt to usurp a historically Sikh territory. The professed intention of the Muslim League to impose a Muslim state on the Punjab (a Muslim majority province) was anathema to the Sikhs. In response, the Sikh party Shiromani Akali Dal argued for a community that was separate from Hindus and Muslims.
(SOURCE: The Aftermath of Partition in South Asia, Routledge, p. 100).
My point is that Pakistan was created as a Muslim state, so since persecution against Muslims is getting worse and worse in India, I don’t understand why Indian Muslims don’t just mass migrate to Pakistan.
I’ve never understood why Muslims don’t just leave nations they face persecution in.
When Jews face persecution in Europe, they just go to Israel.
Linda Rivera says
For 1,400 dreadful years, Muslims have SEVERELY persecuted non-Muslims of all races and religions. Their BLOOD CRIES OUT From the Ground to God.
I’m disgusted with constant pro-Islam propaganda. The extreme suffering of the millions of victims of Muslims are ignored.
You don’t appear to know of the very severe Muslim persecution of Hindus, Sikhs and Christians in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
Every year in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, large numbers of Hindu, Christian and Sikh girls are regularly kidnapped, gang raped, tortured, forcibly converted to Islam and sexually enslaved.
Please God, HELP Islam’s massive numbers of victims!
FaithfulServantsOfChristKJV says
Yeah, I wouldn’t have an issue with a Christian area being created, separate from Muslims, Hindus, and others.
Because both Hindus and Muslims are the top persecutors of Christians. Hindu India and Islamic Nigeria are ranked among the top 10 worst violators of religious liberty.
Hence why I also believe in armed self-defense.
So the next time some bloodthirsty Hindus or bloodthirsty Muslims try to do terrorism against Christians they will be met with the tip of a gun rather than turning the other cheek.
FaithfulServantsOfChristKJV says
I’ll say this. I’m not pro-Hinduism, in fact I’ve made videos criticizing Hinduism just like I’ve made videos criticizing Islam.
That being said, something I don’t understand about the whole situation over in India is why the Muslims don’t go to Pakistan or Bangladesh.
Pakistan was actually created solely so the Muslims could have their own State in that part of Asia.
Persecution of Muslims is getting pretty bad in India (it’s approaching levels of genocide according to Human Rights orgs), so if I were Muslim I would just leave and go to Pakistan.
It’s similar to how Jews would go to Israel to flee persecution in Europe.
Anyway, that’s just my two cents on the matter.
BareNakedIslam says
I agree, the Muslims should have been forced to go to one of those countries. Just like the Muslims in Israel should have been forced to go to one of 56 Muslim countries. ALL the Arab countries that had been home to Jews for centuries kicked all but a handful of them out in 1948.
Andrew+Blackadder says
Heres two words you never see put together……. muslim tolerance….