Cars torched, rocks thrown, terror attack threats by al-Qaeda, and mass Muslim hysteria all over India in nationwide anti-blasphemy riots. Indian police have finally cracked down on violent protests that erupted over so-called anti-Islamic remarks against Prophet Mohammed by two members of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
In case you haven’t been following this story: So what are the “controversial remarks?”
During a cable news debate last week, former spokeswoman Nupur Sharma – discussing widespread mockery by Muslims of Hindu gods following the debated discovery of a sacred Hindu relic in a mosque – suggested that Hindus should mock the Islamic hadith, or holy writing, stating that Muhammad married a girl named Aisha when she was six years old. Sharma also mentioned several other Quranic statements she considered potential fodder for jokes.
“Should I start saying all these things that are mentioned in your scriptures?” “Should I start mocking claims of flying horses or the flat-earth theory as mentioned in your Quran? You are marrying a 6-year-old girl and having sex with her when she turned 9. Who did it? Prophet Muhammad,”
Dawn Earlier this month, the BJP suspended its spokeswoman Nupur Sharma and expelled another leader, Naveen Kumar Jindal, for their controversial comments about the Prophet (PBUH) that also angered several Muslim countries, causing a massive diplomatic challenge for the Modi government.
Clashes over the remarks simmered across the country, as some in the minority Muslim community see them as the latest instance of pressure and humiliation under BJP rule on issues ranging from freedom of worship to the wearing of hijab head scarves.
Two teenagers were killed when police opened fire on protesters in the eastern city of Ranchi last week. Sporadic riots in northern Uttar Pradesh state led to the arrests of over 300 people.
In the eastern state of West Bengal, authorities enforced an emergency law prohibiting public gatherings in the industrial district of Howrah until June 16. At least 70 people were arrested on charges of rioting and disturbing public order, with Internet services suspended for over 48 hours after the latest communal violence.
In occupied Kashmir, police arrested a youth for posting a video against Nupur Sharma, a former spokesperson of India’s ruling party who had made derogatory remarks about the Prophet (PBUH), officials said on Sunday.
The video, circulated on YouTube, has been withdrawn by authorities as part of a wider attempt to curb religious unrest that has spread across the country.
BJP leaders have issued instructions to several senior members to be “extremely cautious” when talking about religion on public platforms and the government continues to tighten public security.
The report also said police raided the home of student leader Afreen Fatima, arresting her father Mohammad Javed, mother and sister. They have accused her father of “masterminding the riots.”
Al-Qaeda Threatens India with Child Suicide Bombers for ‘Blasphemy’
In a statement published Tuesday, the al-Qaeda terrorist organization threatened to unleash a string of child suicide bombings across India in response to an ongoing controversy surrounding remarks about Muhammad.
“Saffron terrorists should now await their end in Delhi and Bombay [Mumbai] and in UP [Uttar Pradesh] and Gujarat,” the al-Qaeda statement, published through its online communications networks, read in part, according to India’s NDTV. “Saffron terrorists” is a reference to Hindus, later referred to as “Hindutva terrorists occupying India;” the listed locations are regions of India.
Sharma’s comments resulted in her suspension from the BJP for six years and riots featuring thousands of people across the country demanding her arrest for “blasphemy.” Insulting religions generally is a crime in the Indian penal code.
In addition to the riots, Sharma’s comments have become a diplomatic crisis for India as much of the Muslim world responded by demanding further condemnation of the remarks. Multiple foreign ministries – including those of neighboring Pakistan and Afghanistan (run by the Taliban) – and the Organization for Islamic Cooperation (OIC) have vocally condemned India’s government and demanded more punishment for the alleged blasphemy.
Reuters, BBC Denounce Indian Official for Offending Islam, Refuse to Report What She Said
Both Reuters and the BBC have extensive stories on the Islamic hate campaign waged against spokeswoman Nupur Sharma of India’s ruling party for noting that Mohammed was a pedophile, without ever explaining what it is she said. There are pages and pages of outraged responses without ever clarifying what they involve.
What were those comments? Reuters won’t report them.
The BBC has a massive story that focuses entirely on the outrage without ever discussing what everyone is outraged about.
Jamal Ibrahim says
Yes Mumhammed did marry Aishah when she was 6 and consumate the marriage when she was nine . 900 years later this was still the practice in England as recorded by William Shakespeare in Romeo and Juliet . lady Capulet ,Juliets mother , upbraides the 12 year old Juliet saying her friends married at 9 and their children were now receiving formal education . This marriage was so that a strong intelligent woman could relate the speech and wisdom and deeds of Muhammed after his death .
BareNakedIslam says
Jamal said: “This marriage was so that a strong intelligent woman could relate the speech and wisdom and deeds of Muhammed after his death.”
A 9-year-old strong intelligent women? A 9 year old is not a woman and if she had half a brain she would have run as far away as she could get from that old fart.
As for spreading the speech and wisdom and deeds of Mo, you mean like these?
Surah 3:151: “We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve (all non-Muslims) …”
Surah 9:5: “Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush …”
Quran 5:54 “O ye who believe. Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors. They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily God guideth not a people unjust.”
Jamal Ibrahim says
Thanks for replying people will see by your comment you have no understanding of anything .
Linda Rivera says
From its invention 1,400 years ago, the followers of the MURDER BLOOD CONQUEST Cult of Islam have barbarically slaughtered hundreds of millions of innocents — Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Jews and other non Muslim innocents.
Their BLOOD CRIES OUT From the Ground to God.
https://www.sikhnet.com/news/islamic-india-biggest-holocaust-world-history
Mughal India ~ The Biggest Holocaust in World History
The genocide suffered by the Hindus of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.
With the invasion of India by Mahmud Ghazni about 1000 A.D., began the Muslim invasions into the Indian subcontinent and they lasted for several centuries.
Nadir Shah made a mountain of the skulls of the Hindus he killed in Delhi alone. Babur raised towers of Hindu skulls at Khanua when he defeated Rana Sanga in 1527 and later he repeated the same horrors after capturing the fort of Chanderi.
Akbar ordered a general massacre of 30,000 Rajputs after he captured Chithorgarh in 1568. The Bahamani Sultans had an annual agenda of killing a minimum of 100,000 Hindus every year.
The history of medieval India is full of such instances. The holocaust of the Hindus in India continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Panjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700’s.
We have elaborate literary evidence of the World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with India’s Hindus.
These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed – and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhist and Jainist, mass rapes of women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well documented and provide solid proof of the World’s biggest holocaust.
Quotes from modern historians
Dr. Koenraad Elst in his article “Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” states:
“There is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust.
Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty.
The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526).“
He also writes in his book “Negation in India”:
“The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves.
Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.”
Will Durant argued in his 1935 book “The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage” (page 459):
“The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period.”
Francois Gautier in his book ‘Rewriting Indian History’ (1996) wrote:
“The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history……
Andrew+Blackadder says
Just imagine how those crazy wee muslim idiots would react if she had actually said something untrue about islam or their guru dude, may piss be upon him.
Anonymous says
India should arrest all Muslims and throw them in concentration camps. There are very effective means of dealing with Muslim prisoners so big mouth Muslim groups that threaten death and mayhem can worry about retailation on the Muslim prisoners.
Linda Rivera says
Of course the SATANIST UN Secretary General, COMMUNIST Antonio Guterres and the SATANIST United Nations joined in the condemnation and verbal attacks on the poor Hindu lady. Read my comment below this one.
More than 100,000 scandal-plagued UN “peacekeeping” troops have mass raped children and trafficked sex slaves.
It’s what the United Nations does. The SATANIST UN is an Extreme Danger to every innocent on earth.
If the UN had the tiniest shred of decency and goodness, the UN would condemn the calls by massive numbers of Muslims to slaughter, hang, and even behead the terrified Hindu lady for telling the truth about warlord Mohammad. But the UN does not.
Instead, the wicked UN maliciously condemns and deliberately inflames and provokes Muslims worldwide to extreme violence.
Linda Rivera says
UN Secretary General, COMMUNIST Antonio Guterres, is Excessively Evil. The UN is Excessively Evil. More than 100,000 scandal-plagued UN “peacekeeping” troops have MASS RAPED CHILDREN, TRAFFICKED SEX SLAVES and Violently Attacked and Slaughtered innocents.
The UN is a SATANIST organization.
https://thenewamerican.com/new-un-chief-globalist-socialist-extremist/
New UN Chief: Globalist, Socialist, Extremist
October 14, 2016
Globalism-loving socialist Antonio Guterres of Portugal (shown), infamous primarily for helping to engineer the massive tsunami of Islamic immigration into the West, has been officially selected as the next secretary-general of the United Nations.
His prescription for what ails the world: more socialism at the planetary level, more power for the UN, more “global governance,” and more mass migration from the Third World to Western countries. In other words, more of the same extremism that already has the world and the West on the brink.
Guterres was formally selected last week by the UN Security Council, beating out corrupt Bulgarian communist and UNESCO chief Irina Bokova, who was the “correct” gender but whose horrifying record was exposed prior to her selection.
The UN General Assembly, dominated by unfree governments and dictatorships, confirmed Guterres for the job on October 13. The Portuguese bureaucrat, 67, was the Socialist prime minister of Portugal before becoming the UN “High Commissioner for Refugees” in 2005. He also led the global tyranny-promoting Socialist International.
The Portuguese politician and bureaucrat will assume office in January of 2017. In his capacity as chief administrative officer of the UN, he will oversee almost 50,000 UN bureaucrats and counting.
He will also help manage more than 100,000 scandal-plagued UN “peacekeeping” troops, currently facing global criticism for raping children around the world, trafficking sex slaves,
slaughtering unarmed protesters and Christians, killing tens of thousands of Haitians with cholera, persecuting whistleblowers, and more — all with total impunity.
The scandals have become so horrifying that even the U.S. Congress has threatened to withhold funds.
Linda Rivera says
At age 54, Mohammad married six-year-old Aisha, and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old.” The Islamic Hadiths confirm this:
“The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)” (Bukhari 7.62.88).
It’s what the Hadiths state.
As this is fact, why are Muslims around the world ENRAGED by the Hindu lady stating the truth about cruel, warlord Mohammad? It’s in their Hadiths!
Muslim countries declare that CORRECTLY stating what Islamic Scriptures say is Islamophobia!!! And truth tellers must be punished!!!!!!!!!!!!
Muslims scream that stating absolute truth that warlord Mohammad sexually molested Aisha from age six and raped her at nine is offensive and insulting to Mohammad and scream for the Indian lady to be slaughtered — for telling the truth about Mohammad.
Why are Muslims not condemning Mohammad, instead of condemning the Hindu lady and declaring she must be slaughtered, hanged, or beheaded???
???????????????????????????
Is it because deep in their hearts Muslims know what warlord Mohammad did to Aisha was wrong, cruel, wicked and evil???
And Completely SATANIC.
Jamal Ibrahim says
Marraige at the time of reaching child bearing age was the practice in the old world . As recorded by Willaim Shakespeare in Romeo and Juliet 900 years later . Lady Capulet chides Juliet saying she is 12 and unmarried while her friends got married at 9 and whose children were now reeiving education .
Az gal says
6 & 9 is not childbearing age, idiot.
Cleavis W Nowell says
With the 6th century mentality of crescent hyenas it is necessary to demolish any buildings infested with rabid ideology of conquest islamists !
mjazzguitar says
Maybe I missed it, but I didn’t see where they are demolishing muslim houses.
BareNakedIslam says
I just posted a new story about it: https://barenakedislam.com/2022/06/15/good-for-india-employing-israeli-policies-for-dealing-with-muslims-who-instigate-violence-and-terrorism/