The Palestinian Authority has drafted a resolution demanding that the United Nations evict more than 500,000 Israeli citizens from their ancestral homeland of Judea & Samaria

The Palestinian Authority is circulating a draft resolution asking the United Nations General Assembly to force Israel to withdraw from Judea and Samaria (renamed the West Bank by Jordan in 1948 when they illegally annexed it) and remove some 500,000 Israeli citizens living in the territory within six months. Even though this resolution, if passed, would still be unbinding, it will cause all Hell to break loose in the region, especially as the bogus International Criminal Court has just declared Israel to be an illegal state.

JNS (h/t Marvin W) In addition to demanding an end to Israel’s civilian and military presence, the draft text urges U.N. member states to impose sanctions on officials in Jerusalem, banning trade with Jewish businesses in Judea and Samaria and blocking weapons sales to Israel if they might be used in the area.

According to a report by Israel’s Channel 12 on Sunday, the resolution, which cites a July 19 advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice in The Hague, is expected to be brought to a vote next week.

Israel’s Ambassador to the U.N. Danny Danon, attacked the P.A.’s move and called on the 193 members of the General Assembly to “outright reject this shameful resolution and instead adopt a resolution condemning Hamas, calling on it to release all the hostages immediately.

“Let it be clear: Nothing will stop nor deter Israel in its mission to bring back all the hostages and defeat Hamas,” the Israeli diplomat stated.

“If this resolution passes in the General Assembly, exactly one year after the Oct. 7 massacre, the most brutal massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, it would be a reward for terrorism and a message to the world that the barbaric massacre of children, the rape of women and the kidnapping of innocent civilians is a profitable move,” added Danon.

While the Palestinians have a near-automatic majority in the General Assembly—including the overwhelming portion of nearly 60 Arab and Muslim governments—resolutions passed by the body are not binding. On July 19, the International Court of Justice, the principal judicial arm of the U.N., issued a non-binding, 83-page opinion declaring Israel’s 57-year “occupation” of Judea and Samaria to be “unlawful.”

The non-binding ruling claimed that “Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the regime associated with them, have been established and are being maintained in violation of international law. Jerusalem is “obliged to bring an end to its presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible,” the U.N. court added.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denounced the ruling, saying that no “absurd” ICJ opinion can “deny this historical truth or the legal right of Israelis to live in their own communities in our ancestral home.”

ALSO SEE: Palestinian Authority’s UN resolution declares open season on Israelis

(h/t Marvin W) Professor Anne Bayefsky, President of Human Rights Voices and Director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust said, “The stage has now been set for a full-fledged effort by the United Nations to destroy the Jewish state by means of the first-ever wholly Palestinian-drafted resolution. It is scheduled for adoption at an ‘Emergency Session’ of the General Assembly on September 17 and 18, 2024.”

She explained how the PA was allowed to submit such a resolution. “Post-October 7, the General Assembly upgraded the status of what the organization labels the ‘State of Palestine.’ The move was an obvious reward for terrorism and had the predictable effect on Palestinian strategy: more terror and more intransigence. The upgrade included the power ‘to submit proposals’ and to ‘introduce them.’ That was May 10, 2024 and the new powers were to take effect from the start of the 79th session of the General Assembly, which begins today, September 10, 2024. The result was immediate: a ‘State of Palestine’ resolution dedicated to Israel’s delegitimization and demolition.”

“To the resolution’s authors, facts don’t matter. Apartheid ‘Palestine’ is the planned state where no Jew will be tolerated, while in Israel, Arabs have more rights and freedoms than in any Arab state. It’s a classic Nazi antisemitic inversion technique. Switch victim and perpetrator,” Prof. Bayefsky said. “The resolution marks the return of the General Assembly’s 1975 Zionism-is-racism libel.”

She added that “the resolution seeks to terminate the viability of the Jewish state by introducing a global system of boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS). ” “’All states’ are told to ‘implement sanctions, including travel bans and asset freezes.’ In effect, it’s an open-ended global pogrom to sanction, ban and bankrupt supporters of Israel, that is, anyone or any business that the jackals deem ‘responsible.,’” she said.

Furthermore, “The resolution’s BDS demands include emasculating Israel’s right of self-defense – a Charter right of every UN member state but the Jewish state. Encompassing a gargantuan swath of possible assistance to Israel, the resolution calls on ‘all states’ to ‘cease any direct or indirect transfer, sale, export and diversion of arms’ and ‘dual use items” and ‘technologies’ to Israel and ‘any’ ‘cooperation…which may…interfere with the exercise by the Palestinian people of its right to self-determination.’”

She declared, “The resolution’s total arms embargo is quite simply a declaration of open-season on Israelis. The resolution demands the ethnic cleansing of Jews from the land of Israel. It insists upon Israel ‘allowing all Palestinians living in Jordan or anywhere else to return to their original place of residence.’ “Reference is made to Israel’s alleged obligations to ‘the full implementation of all relevant UN resolutions,’ a plethora of poisonous life-threatening demands upon Israel adopted over more than half a century.”

“In the meantime, the resolution sets up a specific plan of action to demolish Israel, including: (1) a new entity to create ‘an international register of damage…to the Palestinian people’ in order to fabricate astronomical fines as ‘reparation,’ (2) full support for criminal ‘prosecutions’ and throwing Israelis into prison in the Hague, (3) the convening of a new international conference ‘to advance implementation’ of every antisemitic anti-Israel UN resolution throughout history called ‘the UN resolutions pertaining to the Question of Palestine,’ (4) the establishment of a new UN apartheid committee mirroring the ‘Special Committee on the Policies of Apartheid of the Government of the Republic of South Africa’ that was created in 1962, this time dedicated to wiping an alleged ‘apartheid’ Israel off the map (in diplomatic double-talk, ‘to examine…to report and make recommendations.’)”

“In an extremely long resolution, the Palestinians have dumped in almost everything they’ve ever wanted and made sure to omit everything they don’t.”

“There’s no mention of negotiations. No Oslo Accords. No condemnation of Hamas. No mention of the Hamas Charter openly dedicated to genocide, or the genocidal reality of October 7. No mention of Palestinian Authority law and policy that pays Palestinians to kill Jews. No condemnation of the execution of Israeli hostages, Palestinian suicide bombings, rocket attacks, stabbings, beheadings, shootings, car-rammings, or rapes. No call for the release of the remaining hostages. No mention of Israel’s right of self-defense. No acknowledgment of the Jewish people’s right to self-determination,” she noted.

“Whatever the outcome of the U.S. elections, Palestinians hope to convince the Harris-Biden administration to repeat that Democratic strategy and allow the adoption of a UN Security Council resolution to support full recognition of a Palestinian state before the end of the year,” she said.

“The danger to world peace from the current resolution and this intended outcome cannot be overestimated,” Prof. Bayefsky concluded. “The resolution deliberately puts everything back on center stage in mid-December by giving a three-month deadline for the production of a Secretary-General report on its implementation and the supposed realization of Palestinian ‘self-determination.'”