Litigation jihadists from CAIR complain to South Carolina prison that Muslim women prisoners are not allowed to wear their head coverings during search and processing. In a heartbeat, the prison bows to the Islamic supremacists and changes its policy to accommodate the demands of Muslim Brotherhood front group CAIR (Council on Anti-American Islamic Relations).
In a letter to CAIR, Ronaldo D. Myers, director of the Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center in Columbia, S.C., wrote:
“As requested, we have reviewed and updated our policies to ensure clarity with our staff on the processing and searching of female detainees of the Muslim faith, and specifically have exempted the wearing of religious headwear from our facility’s ‘Prohibited Acts’ policy.”
But that’s not all:
Earlier this year, the CAIR’s Washington state chapter welcomed a new policy in King County that permits hijab in all jails and courthouses.
SEE: Hijab Approved for King County Jail Inmates
Last year, CAIR’s St. Louis chapter thanked county and law enforcement officials for agreeing to provide religious accommodation for Muslim women who wear hijab and are held in the St. Louis County Jail in Clayton, Mo.
CAIR: Muslim’s Arrest Spurs Policy Review in St. Louis County
CAIR’s Minnesota chapter helped resolve a similar case in which a Muslim woman sought to exercise her religious rights while in jail.
SEE: CAIR-MN Calls on Sheriff’s Office to Grant Hijab Accommodation
In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to overturn a lower court ruling that said a Muslim woman “had the right to wear the scarf unless jailers could show it was a security risk.”
In that case, the Muslim woman’s suit cited the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which prohibits state and local governments from imposing “a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person residing in or confined to an institution.”
SEE: Muslim Woman Can Sue Jailers for Making Her Remove Her Headscarf
SCOTUS: Souhair Khatib Can Sue for Having to Remove Her Hijab
I guess when trial begins they want to be tried under sharia law. Letem, maybe the offence will be a head removal.
Reblogged, my friend. 🙂
Strange is it that in Saudi Arabia Roman Catholics (cristians) are allowed to wear a cross around their neck when arraigned or when in prison…….
When you break the laws you should lose your rights. One good thought would be that in the event of a fight between a bag wearing savage and another person, the bag would give the ultimate winner something to grab that could be used to swing the muslim around with. Wake up America. Take a look at how europe is losing the battle with the muslims who are destroying the culture of europe with their parasitic welfare abuse and so on.
Yes cat, and that still applies…to us.
Muslims get away with murder, look at ” Lord” Ahmed in GB. He killed a man through reckless driving but was given a few weeks and was out in less . Or the pedofile who was not sentenced because he claimed his Islamic school had never taught raping underage girls was a crime in GB, or a bunch of rabid Somalian girls attacking and maiming a white girl, the judge said they were drunk and as they were sweet good Muslim girls could not be used to drink, so hardly their fault??!!
Insanity reigns, or Sharia, or both.
hanna, you are so right. We must keep reminding people of this. 🙂
Here is an interesting story about hijab in a women’s prison:
I was thinking about what if a badass biker babe wanted to make a Muslima her sex slave, and she refused, that the biker babe might use the Muslima’s hijab against her.
Here I found a heartwarming story similar to the scenario I imagined.
http://www.ummah.com/forum/showthread.php?194168-Woman-strangled-with-her-own-hijab
Steve, I’ve posted a few other fun stories about that:
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2011/10/20/muslim-woman-nearly-strangled-to-death-when-her-headbag-gets-caught-in-a-cake-mixer/
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2010/04/08/australia-burqa-wearing-mom-strangled-by-her-veil-in-freak-go-cart-accident/
One good thing about that is that if a muslima wants to commit suicide, her hijab will come in handy, and it is religiously sanctioned and prisons cannot take away her right to have it because it is her freedom of religion.
Bravo! Let Muslimas have the right to commit suicide in prison! Of course, if the Muslima wants to use her hijab to kill someone else, then that is a different problem.
Steve, ah, yes, the silver lining.
Hard to enter a comment,I’m puking right now,I can’t believe this garbage,I know BNI isn’t making it up !!WTF over !!! Instead of calling it prison,lets change the name to muzzie day care center ! With over 2000 mosque now in America,we will need more prisons for the islamist! More honor killings,more attacks on infidels…Just the tip of the iceberg America,put your seat belt on !!!
Buzz, although I work in a creative business (advertising), even I couldn’t make this stuff up.
Yes BNI. Truth is often stranger than fiction. Do you think we’d have been having these conversations 25 years ago? I thought Islam was a curry then..lol.
johnny, when I was growing up, an Arab family moved in next door. My mother baked a cake and took it over to welcome them to the neighborhood. They opened the door part way, said thank you, took the cake, then slammed the door in my mother’s face. We never talked to them again. At the time, we only thought of them as Arabs, not Muslims, even though the father’s name was Mohammed Sheikh. Apparently, they knew we were Jews.
oooh targets for other inmates. Or are they housed seperate from other female inmates?
Scarves can be used to hang, choke and garrotte both inmates and guards. Not good. It will occur.
The veil is the flag of jihad. The veil marks women who have thrown their self-esteem under the bus and accepted they are dirt under the heels of misogynist, braindead, killer zombie inbred Mozman jihadists.
Hail pedophile pirate! Hail eternal slaves of mozmen! Hail domestic animals and prisoners of supremacists!
All thos eincarcerated, while some are innocent, must conform to rules that protect other inmates and the secrutiy staff. The bag comes off because it’s ulterior purpose is to hide weapons or communications between enemy combatants.