Muslims are clearly resistant to the indoctrination of children in sexual deviancy—a phenomenon that goes under various euphemisms and acronyms I deign not employ (“pride,” “inclusivity,” LGBTQ+-whatever). As such, are Muslims the long-awaited heroes who will save America’s children? Many conservatives seem to think so—and for good reason.
Raymond Ibrahim For example, last October, 2022, havoc broke out during a schoolboard meeting in Dearborn, when hundreds of mostly Muslim parents protested the circulation of sexually deviant books in the city’s school system. Many protesters carried signs in both English and Arabic, some saying: “Keep Your Dirty Books in the Closet,” “Stop Grooming Our Kids,” and “Homosexuality Big Sin.”
On Monday, a Dearborn Public Schools board meeting in Michigan was shut down as hundreds of Muslims protested the use of LGBTQ books. They held up signs in Arabic & English referencing they are in the majority & that homosexuality is sin.pic.twitter.com/0L5aFWqpNT
— Andy Ngô 🏳️🌈 (@MrAndyNgo) October 13, 2022
More recently, in Ottawa, Canada, soon after it was revealed that a schoolteacher had berated a Muslim student for merely trying to skip classes dedicated to celebrating sexual deviancy (“pride activities”), a group of Muslim children, encouraged by a woman in hijab, appeared in a protest stomping on so-called “pride” flags. When asked what message they wanted to send, the hijabed woman said, “Leave our kids alone!” The shirt of one of the boys had an even more ominous warning: “Now or Never.”
On June 6, yet another Muslim-led protest of some 400 people took place in Montgomery County, Maryland, where schools recently decided that children can no longer opt out of sexual indoctrination.
Clearly, then, if most American—including Christian—parents are passively open to the sexual grooming of their children, Muslims are not.
That said, on June 6, the same day of the Montgomery protest, but on the other coast of America, the most dramatic of all protests—one that spiraled into an all-out brawl against Antifa—broke out in Glendale, California. There, more parents—with more signs saying “Leave Our Children Alone!”—protested this same new law that prevents them from opting their children out of sexual indoctrination.
An all out brawl is underway outside the Glendale School Board meeting in Los Angeles between Armenian-American families angry at the school doing pride events and far left protesters that have gathered to oppose them.
pic.twitter.com/sZ0RxQW8VG— 1776 Project PAC (@1776ProjectPac) June 7, 2023
Those parents, however, were not Muslim—far from it—but rather Armenians, Orthodox Christians, who, due to their proximity to and experiences with Muslim neighbors, have little love for Islam.
What to make of all this? Are Muslims, due to some “inherent” conservatism, the natural leaders of any U.S. resistance to state-sanctioned sexual indoctrination? Or is there more to all this than meets the eye?
As more fully discussed here, Muslims and Armenians are resistant to Western-sanctioned perversion less because of religion, and more because they are immigrant peoples—meaning they have not been in the West long enough to have their senses dulled and minds subverted by nonstop propaganda and indoctrination. They still have a very healthy supply of common sense, a commodity that has been under assault for generations in America.
So when you tell them that there are countless genders, or that men can become pregnant, rather than do what most Americans do—roll their eyes but passively acquiesce nonetheless—immigrant peoples get very angry and disgusted. Moreover, as immigrant peoples, both Armenians and Muslims really care about their children—more than they care about being “canceled” on social media.
But if Muslims are not required to lead the battle against sexual corruption, can they at least be allies, including for conservative Christians? I think so, with some caveats.
Perhaps the best way to explain it all is by analogy: take two Americans from very different demographics, say, a Black man from the rough streets of Chicago, Illinois, and a White man from affluent Darien, Connecticut. Put them at the same party, and it may not be surprising if they do not gravitate to or interact with one another, things reserved for others more aligned with their respective backgrounds.
Now, take these same two men and drop them off in a very foreign nation—say China—and watch them become fast friends and allies. The reason behind this dramatic change is simple: whereas at the American party, they each found people much more akin to them, in China, they become remarkably akin, and not just due to language, but because they still share many cultural reference points from living in America.
Now apply this to, say, practicing Christians and Muslims: in a natural setting, they have little in common and see the world through different lens (despite all nonsensical claims otherwise).
A much touted conference in Bahrain, dedicated to promoting “interfaith dialogue” and “coexistence,” recently came to a close. Featuring many leading Christian and Muslim figures — including Pope Francis and Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb, the Grand Imam of Al Azhar — the conference’s purpose was “to build bridges of dialogue between leaders of religions, sects, thought, culture and media, in cooperation with Al Azhar, the Catholic Church, the Muslim Council of Elders, and other international institutions concerned with dialogue, human coexistence and tolerance.”
While this sounds splendid on paper, in reality, it often amounts to little and arguably exacerbates matters. Put differently, this and all other such conferences between Christians and Muslims that are sponsored by “official” channels are often dedicated to one thing: exonerating Islam of all the misdeeds committed daily in its name.
For example, not only did the Grand Imam — who smiles, hugs, and preaches brotherly peace to the pope while sponsoring radicalism and even death for apostates when speaking to Muslims — repeatedly insist that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism, but so too did Pope Francis, blaming “erroneous interpretations” of Islam for the violence and intolerance committed in its name.
Most recently he was invited to the Vatican and warmly embraced by Pope Francis. Al Azhar had angrily cut off all ties with the Vatican five years earlier when, in the words of U.S. News, former Pope Benedict “had demanded greater protection for Christians in Egypt after a New Year’s bombing on a Coptic Christian church in Alexandria killed 21 people. Since then, Islamic attacks on Christians in the region have only increased.”
Pope Francis referenced his meeting with Tayeb as proof that Muslims are peaceful: “I had a long conversation with the imam, the Grand Imam of the Al-Azhar University, and I know how they [Muslims] think. They seek peace, encounter.”
At a time when Muslims all around the world are terrorizing and slaughtering non-Muslims in the name of Islam, Pope Francis, the head of the Catholic Church, continues trying to distance Islam from violence.
A journalist asked him about the recent and “barbarous assassination of Fr. Jacques Hamel” in France, and how the priest was clearly “killed in the name of Islam.” To this Francis replied that he doesn’t like speaking about Islamic violence because there is plenty of Christian violence as well…
The Cairo Institute for Human Rights recently issued a statement accusing Al Azhar of having two faces: one directed at the West and which preaches freedom and tolerance, and one directed to Muslims and which sounds not unlike ISIS:
In March 2016 before the German parliament, Sheikh al-Tayeb made unequivocally clear that religious freedom is guaranteed by the quran, while in Cairo he makes the exact opposite claims…. Combating terrorism and radical religious ideologies will not be accomplished by directing at the West and its international institutions religious dialogues that are open, support international peace and respect freedoms and rights, while internally promoting ideas that contribute to the dissemination of violent extremism through the media and educational curricula of Al Azhar and the mosques.
Moreover, being against the sexual indoctrination and corruption of their children is no real commonality: historically, and till the present, that’s what every normal person outside the Western world believes. It’s no more of a special commonality than generic facts, such as saying all humans need air and water to survive.
However, in the West, Christians, Muslims, and all normal minded people are no longer in a “natural setting.” Rather, they are in a bizarro world, where up is down and wrong is right. In such an environment, the onetime common and taken for granted belief that children should not be sexually groomed in public schools becomes a unique and socially binding belief, one that can be rallied around.
In other words, the so-called “Left” has so subverted and undermined reality, that peoples who under normal circumstances would have little in common now find themselves natural allies for a cause once taken for granted.
Two final observations—one pro, one con—concerning an alliance with Muslims:
Pro: The Left has traditionally catered to Muslims, and is constantly chiding the Right about the need to be more understanding of and acquiescent to Muslim sensibilities. As such, having this “protected minority” go against it may be more challenging for the Left than simply more of “those pesky Christians.”
Con: As ever, Muslims—who live according to very tribalistic doctrines meant to keep them separate from and clean of infidels—are not protesting any of this because they care for the betterment of America, or because they care for American children. They are in it for their Muslim children. Period.
During the Montgomery protests, for example, Kareem Monib, the Muslim leader of an organization called the Coalition of Virtue—which apparently is made up of people of all and no faiths—said, “Our first issue is to protect Muslim children in public schools from indoctrination to things that conflict with their beliefs.” He further justified his position by citing the “Koran and sayings of the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him.”
Meet one of the lead organizers of the rally — Kareem Monib — an American Muslim engineer, a loving father and son of Oklahoma to parents from Egypt. He is cofounder of a new parents’ group, @CoalitionOfVirtue, that organized the rally. Yes, virtue. It is a value. He introduces… pic.twitter.com/xVehWu7sOI
— Asra Nomani • Defeating the #WokeArmy (@AsraNomani) June 7, 2023
Peter Marshall Haugo says
No! They may agree with us on ONE thing BUT they will always seek to dominate our society with primitive ideologies and chip away at our freedom of speech. Not to mention the fact that so many of them want to force all females to wear burkas
Pray Hard says
Besides, moslems are some of the biggest lgbtxyz types on the planet, including bestiality, rape and necrophilia! That is, to begin with, they’re completely hypocritical about it.
RadicalCentrist says
That’s a sickening, obviously untrue, vicious, bigoted statement with no evidence. So-called christians in US/”allied” militaries have murdered, maimed and displaced millions of people, mostly in Muslim countries in recent decades.
You should be ashamed of yourselves. Muslims have every right to hate, fear and resent US, even more than the other way around, by now.
I am neither christian nor muslim but don’t tolerate liars and people who slur huge groups of people of many different cultures based on relatively few people’s actions.
We absolutely should ally with Muslims to protect our children from this homosexual, transgender and other mental illness and moral corruption. Praise God whenever people of any religion can successfully fight back against that filth.
Muslims are showing more courage and consistency than your pathetic churches.
Pray Hard says
No.
Reader says
Ibrahim is not suggesting that we are confederate in any sense. Rather the Muslim and Christian communities are both aggrieved and offended by the perverse practices becoming enforced upon children.
I quote, “ Muslims—who live according to very tribalistic doctrines meant to keep them separate from and clean of infidels—are not protesting any of this because they care for the betterment of America, or because they care for American children. They are in it for their Muslim children. Period!” – Raymond Ibrahim
Raymond’s comments are noteworthy and make a clear distinction that the “Left’s” fascination with Muslims in particular and Islam generally speaking exists because of the Left’s hatred and contempt for all things Christian.
This is soon to backfire. As Muslims become more and more forced to face and comply to the demands of the Left, their (Islamic) hatred and contempt of the “infidel” must break out into the open against the Left along with Islam’s notorious conduct against Christians everywhere and those of America whom they despise.
The Left will have nowhere to go for consolation as Islam hates all and everyone in opposition to Islam’s perverse views expressed by their God Allah.
Who Cares says
Problem is that we let this cat out of the bag in the first place!
The alphabet homo brigade has just been allowed to get away with too much. It should have been kept in the bedroom, there are ONLY two sexes MALE and FEMALE no third, forth or fifth, anyone who thinks otherwise is a complete moron. Just by sticking a couple of saline bags in a guys chest and having his dick cut off does not make you a woman likewise having your tits cut off and getting a blowup dick attachment doesn’t make you a man. Too many undignosed looey toon simpletons out there seeking a easy out for there problems.
FaithfulServantsOfChristKJV says
As a born again Saint of Christ (scriptural term for Christians) and Slavic nationalist I would not ally with camel-drinking Ishmaelite Islamics.
It’s a situation in which the enemy of my enemy is not my friend.
Homosexuality/transgenderism is sick, disgusting, pedophilic, diseased, and alien to Slavic values.
Islam is barbaric, bloodthirsty, pedophilic, and Luciferian.
ME Infidel says
I believe RFK, Jr. is absolutely correct that the Fauci cabal pushed Remdesivir, rather than HCQ or IVM, as a treatment for the China Virus which causes kidney and liver failure. In fact, that’s exactly how the CDC and FDA murdered my wife. HOWEVER, it doesn’t mean I agree with him on every issue.
The same is true of Muslims who oppose the sexualization and deviant indoctrination of our kids. How did it become the norm for us to agree 100% of the time with anyone? We don’t even do that with our most intimate relatives or friends. Good for the Muslims to stand against this garbage, but when they otherwise attempt to push Sharia on us, they’re still our enemy.
RC says
What is it about the sharia that you find so objectionable, if you even actually know sharia well? Are you addicted to alcohol? Do you want morally confused “men” purporting to “marry” each other, have unhygienic, unhealthy, unnatural, dead-end “sex” with each other, or God forbid, adopt children? Do you want lenience towards murderers and thieves? Do you want easy casual divorce? What exactly?
BobbyFR94 says
NEVER trust a “good” or “devot” muslime !!!
Enemy of my enemy is not necessairy my ally …
BUT use them, as globalists do !!! those who want to “live free in compliance with the country laws they’re in”, are, whatever they say, APOSTATE in their behavior …
Az gal says
Bullies rule: the left, Muslums, LGBT+. Muslums NO. Arrmenians YES.
Jerven says
I’m a little tired (to say the least) of the assumption that muslims are ‘anti’ trans.
Want to know where the global centre of this perversion is, where most “gender reassignment surgery” occurs? Go on, guess. That’s right it’s … Iran. (Yes, ideologically, as well as organisationally and financially, the US is the source of the ‘worship’ and ‘spread’ globally, but muslims remain the true source).
Want to know the country with the second highest rates? Pakistan (seriously!).
Why? Because they throw gays off skyscrapers, stone them, or just hack them to pieces (we’ll gloss over the hypocrisy that the only “gay” is the one forced to ‘take it’. Whilst the one ‘doing it’ is viewed as just your average good muslim male). Consider the mothers of effeminate sons, they demand, and force, the “conversion” (in their hundreds and thousands), because the alternative is having that son raped and murdered. There are so few gay muslims because … they’ve all either been murdered or … converted.
The ‘left’ is so pro-trans, not because they believe in trans (or even care one jot about them) but … because it is a means to undermine, attack and destroy the institutions (like family) we in the west rely on. The muslims support it (even more avidly) because they believe it’s better to have a converted freakish “girl”, than an obviously gay muslim.
They aren’t anti, they are allies.
BareNakedIslam says
I did a post about that very subject many years ago. When Ahmadinejad was the leader in Iran, the government paid for gender reassignment surgery for gay men and encouraged them to get it.
Hartmut says
Anyone believing in ganging up with Muslims from patriarchal Middle Eastern or African societies is deluded. It’s like hoping the crocodiles will eat him last.
Of course they oppose transgenderism and sexual manipulation of children BUT – they still won’t hesitate to sexually abuse and rape the children of their hosts when given the opportunity. It’s just their satanic cult and culture.
Tommy Blogger says
Will we never learn?
Daniel Erbstoesser says
No NO NO, never ever then i dont play with my enemy no matter what no i kill and destroy my enemy. First you are with them and in the end they behead you then they are only on their side.
Hadenoughalready says
Per title: NO!
We may “agree” on the issue but thaat’s where it ends. Nothing else is agreeable.
Beware making friends with those who agree on minor points and ALWAYS remember: they’re here to subjugate us, not to assimilate with us.
dajjal says
3:28 and 8 other verses tell them not to take us as allies, friends, partners nor protectors. So, we agree about queering our children but how about Muslim indoctrination in our schools?!
Ghulam says
Muslims are ready to go the extra mile.
We will happily BEHEAD the gender identity freaks.
Allah U Akbar
BobbyFR94 says
Ghulam, there is something that I really do NOT understand :
You are AGAINST lgb trucs and satanic deviances, it’s OK with me :-))
So, can you explain how you consider a guy to marry a 6 years old kid and fxxx her when at 9 years old ?
Because, there is a contradiction then …
You’re from Singapour, aren’t you ? Are your parents chinese ?
Ghulam says
You fool. Singapore is not just Chinese – it’s a multiethnic nation with around 20 percent Indians, Malays, Indonesians, Filipinos. There are hundreds of thousands of white people, from Australia, UK and European nations.
I have a historic connection with this place. My grandpa served in the British Indian Army and became a POW in S’pore during the Japanese occupation of WW2.
I am from Kashmir, and have family in Pakistan from my first wife.
Anyway I’m sure you’re not interested in my biography. To answer your question, in medieval times it wasn’t uncommon for girls as young as 10 or 12 years old to get married to much older men.
I do not really care how old Hazrat Aishah was as this practice was prevalent in many countries.
It’s no longer tolerated. And that’s what matters now.
BobbyFR94 says
You’re wrong ; learning about a country I really know very little, is a good thing for me …
Yes for the fact that, in the medieval period, marriage with children was commun…
What I mean is that your “religion” has, today, on 2023, the “model” of marrying children ; a few years ago, we could check it in the area of Palestine …
Do you have several wives ?
I have to admit that you’re an interesting guy, Ghulam …
Question (no relation at all with any subject in this site) : Do you beleive to extraterrestrial intelligence in the univers, as we know it today ?
Ghulam says
Not all Muslims are as backward and savage as the ones rioting in France right now.
I do have intellectual curiosity about the fine things in the universe. I feel insulted when you think Muslims cannot apply their own minds.
I’ve been here longer than you on this site. THINK of what that means.
Don’t apply your Euro Trash lens to understand the world. It’s a much bigger place than your imagination.
BobbyFR94 says
Ghulam, when some muslims want to IMPOSE the 7th century beleives to others, as western sciences PROVED it wrong, you may “excuse me” to doubt about muslims intellects !!
The fact you’ve been here longer, let me know what kind of difference it makes ?
Eh, say, it’s european people who first discovered that the earth was turning around the sun, it’s not, and NEVER be, in the history your “religion”, as you got NO sciences, except such one :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIq3l5p234A&pp=ygUWZnJlcmUgcmFjaGlkIHNjaWVuY2VzIA%3D%3D
If you understand arab from a marocco man, Brother Rachid, let me know about the appallingly so deep STUPIDITY the first “man of science” got when talking about the evil during praying …
I’m curious, let me know about the saying of this cunt !!!
Concerning the universe, we got someone like Jean-Pierre PETIT, the second after Andrei SAKHAROV, to begin modelizing a twin univers, what Jean-Pierre PETIT named ” The JANUS model” refering to the dual personnality of Janus, if you know who he was …
I don’t apply any lens, I directly view the world, maybe you should consider acting the same…
What I like in your comments, is humility you use ;-)))
” La modestie n’est apparemment pas ce qui t’etouffe ”
So, please answer the question about the extraterrestrial existence possibility ; I’m really interested by your answer…
I mean your opinion, not your beleives…
BobbyFR94 says
And, do you have several wives, as your model had ? Of course, limited to 4 ones, if I remember well … :-)))
Rob R says
Hey why are there so many arguments?
I thought the white-haired guy was supposed to have magically saved everything just by being “elected”!
My pronouns are "Vlad" and "Impaler". says
The Cartoon at the bottom says it best, in the end the old saying “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” does not actually work, especially when they are both enemies. Neither one would hesitate to see the Judeo – Christian world smashed.
Mary C says
The transgender, gender identity, and drag queen garbage is the one thing I side with Moslems on; however whether or not we can be official allies is too hard to tell, due to Islamic beliefs on jihad against non-Moslems, taqiyya, etc.
Pray Hard says
Read my most recent comment.
The Tasmanian Devil says
Frankly I can’t see myself ever allying or agreeing with Muslims on anything!
That said, if Muslims are bent on destroying LGBT, which has become a dangerous, festering cancerous cult, so be it.
I’M IN!
Mary C says
Well said!
PS – I say round up all the so-called “trans-females,” and exile them to Islamic countries! >:)
Easterndmondbk says
I don’t see as we can be allies with people who have never keep one single solitary deal they’ve ever made